Islamization of America One Step At a Time.


These mosques are being infused with an activist strain of Islam, Wahhabism.  If you have to ask where the Saudi’s are getting their money, you are not paying attention…it’s coming from you.

 Not to mention, the current U.S. administration in its continuous war against the American people, is doing everything it can to accommodate the “Cordoba Initiative”  project at taxpayers’ expense “that is spearheading plans to build a $100 million Islamic center at Ground Zero, the site where nearly 3,000 Americans were killed by jihadists on 9/11.”  The recent CNN Poll shows 68% of American voters oppose the Ground Zero Mosque.


Those useful idiot non-Muslims who support the building of the mosque near the 9/11 site or anywhere else by invoking the ideal of religious freedom, are empowering a creed that is devoted to stamping out freedom of religion or any other form of freedom.

In this relentless campaign, the Islamists have a vast cadre of “experts,” “talking heads,” and for-purchase politicians who keep endlessly broadcasting the false mantra that Islam is a religion of peace. This latter bunch is criminally complicit in making the populace complacent and furthering the work of the Islamists.

Obama backs Mosque near ground zero , Wake Up America. BowObama Showing True Colors. (via Santosh Bhatt’s Blog)

When mosques are built, imams, mullahs or mosque elders tend to be sent to the U.S. with one clear mission:  Make Islamic religion, laws, and life supreme within the Unite States or any other host country, using any and all tactics necessary. 

 Next, from within the safety of their local mosques, they begin to use their revolting practices and wild sermonizing to force the genteel Americans to relocate to safer, less threatening neighborhoods and cities as is the case in England and other European countries.

They will elect Muslims to all positions of local influence, who will create and enforce policy according to the Sharia law.  Once they have control over a town, they will begin to establish informal Sharia, and there’s nothing the government can (or will want to) do about it.

Obama backs Mosque near ground zero , Wake Up America. BowObama Showing True Colors.

Sharia is the brutal means by which Islam controls its populations by force, intimidation, and punishments for offenses to Allah.  Already in many European countries, national governments have, out of fear, given Islamic fascists the right to establish their own shadow governments within the borders of countries like Sweden and England, where they can control their own populations without accountability.  Proposals for Sharia are being taken seriously by many western countries.

Mohammad (founder of Islam) The Pedophile] understand Mohammad and his cult and you will understand mind set.

Mohammad A. Khan   wrote    in

Here are the best examples-
Although I do not believe there are any versions of Islam, but for colloquial purposes-
Osama is the face of extremist Islam
Obama is the face of moderate Islam
The intentions, however of both are the same!
…One is direct and the other is indirect!

Muhammad: A Cult Leader or Muslims are struck in a cult. (via Santosh Bhatt’s Blog)

Muslims are stuck in a cult….. Muslims are afraid to speak out against jihad terrorism because… Muslims are struck in a cult. Muslims that speak out against Islamic terrorism risk being killed by fellow Muslims because… Muslims are stuck in a cult. Muslims can never be honest with themselves and admit that they have serious problems with what Allah has done and hold much hatred in their hearts.

If you are a Muslim woman or plan to be a Muslim woman for sake of someone’s love, think twice before you jump into Hell or continue to live in Hell. (via Santosh Bhatt’s Blog) (via Santosh Bhatt’s Blog)

Question for Muslim, Can any one answer me ?

 This is HOw Muslims Think.. Wake up America.

Wake up America and just say NO to Islam..Enough is enogh.. just say no..

I recommended a Mosque be allowed to be built at ground zero, that is what the Mayor Blumberg of NY  and our Muslim Presidentwants , but I learned that before the Muzzies wanted to build a Mosque, a Greek Orthodox group wanted to build a church there and was denied permission.

We can not have a dual standard in …the US that allows one religion preference over another.

If the decision was previously made for no religious houses there, then fine leave it at that. But if the Muzzies get their Mosque, let the Greeks also get their church!

What part of NO Moslims don’t understand..



What part of NO Moslims don’t understand..

At 2% to 5%, they begin to proselytize from other ethnic minorities and disaffected groups, often with major recruiting from the jails and among street gangs. This is happening in:

Denmark — Muslim 2%
Germany — Muslim 3.7%
United Kingdom — Muslim 2.7%
Spain — Muslim 4%
Thailand — Muslim 4.6%

From 5% on, they exercise an inordinate influence in proportion to their percentage of the population. For example, they will push for the introduction of halal (clean by Islamic standards) food, thereby securing food preparation jobs for Muslims. They will increase pressure on supermarket chains to feature halal on their shelves — along with threats for failure to comply. This is occurring in:

France — Muslim 8%
Philippines — Muslim 5%
Sweden — Muslim 5%
Switzerland — Muslim 4.3%
The Netherlands — Muslim 5.5%
Trinidad & Tobago — Muslim 5.8%

At this point, they will work to get the ruling government to allow them to rule themselves (within their ghettos) under Sharia, the Islamic Law. The ultimate goal of Islamists is to establish Sharia law over the entire world.

When Muslims approach 10% of the population, they tend to increase lawlessness as a means of complaint about their conditions. In Paris, we are already seeing car-burnings. Any non-Muslim action offends Islam, and results in uprisings and threats, such as in Amsterdam , with opposition to Mohammed
cartoons and films about Islam. Such tensions are seen daily, particularly in Muslim sections, in:

Guyana — Muslim 10%
India — Muslim 13.4%
Israel — Muslim 16%
Kenya — Muslim 10%
Russia — Muslim 15%

Muslims need a place to pray? There’s PLENTY of space to pray in Saudi Arabia.
Christians, Hindu, Jew  in Saudi Arabia also need a place to pray, but you don’t hear any Muslims wailing about building them a church or Temple there, do you?

There is NO residential houses or communities nearby…this is a commerical site…meaning that usually you build churches where the people are and this is the Muslims doing this for political and sensational reasons.
ZERO consideration for the thousands murdered by Islamic radical extremists close by the proposed site!
Just sickening!
The mayor of New York is one of the poorest excuses for being an American!
This is not about religious freedom or our government would not be funding improvements on Muslim mosques around the world right now!
Do you see Obama and his gang trying to rebuilt any synagoges or christian churches or Hindu / Buddist Temples…? NO!
This is an abomination and an offense to all Americans who understand the price of freedom!

A (good) Moslem has to be a Terrorist!

Obama backs Mosque near ground zero , Wake Up America. BowObama Showing True Colors. (via Santosh Bhatt’s Blog)

Obama backs Mosque near ground zero , Wake Up America. BowObama Showing True Colors.

Facebook | Sam Hindu: This is HOw Muslims Think.. Wake up America.

Friday, August 13, 2010 Obama backs Mosque near ground zero President Barack Obama on Friday forcefully endorsed building a mosque near ground zero, saying the country’s founding principles demanded no less. “As a citizen, and as president, I believe that Muslims have the same right to practice their religion as anyone else in this country,” Obama said, weighing in for the first time on a controversy that has riven New York and the nation. “That … Read More

via Santosh Bhatt’s Blog

નિર્દોષોનું લોહી રેડવાના પાઠ આ ધર્મગુરૂ ભણાવે છે….

નિર્દોષોનું લોહી રેડવાના પાઠ આ ધર્મગુરૂ ભણાવે છે….

SOME TIMES BY ;  Sam Hindu on Friday, January 22, 2010 at 7:21am
નિર્દોષોનું લોહી રેડવાના પાઠ આ ધર્મગુરૂ ભણાવે છે….

જો આ જ ધર્મ હોય તો અધર્મ કોને કહેવો એ એક કૂટપ્રશ્ન બની રહે

-૨૦૦૯ના નવેંબરમાં અમેરિકી લશ્કરના ફોર્ટ હૂડ મથક ખાતે મેજર (મનોચિકિત્સક) નિદાલ મલિક હસને કોઇ પૂર્વ ઉશ્કેરણી વિના ડઝનબંધ જવાનો પર ગોળીબાર કર્યો હતો એ તમને કદાચ યાદ હશે. ત્યારબાદ એક મહિલા સાર્જંટે એના પર ગોળીબાર કરીને એને ઇજા પહોંચાડીને વઘુ હત્યાઓ કરતો રોક્યો.

– ૨૦૦૯ના ડિસેંબરની ૨૫મીએ નાતાલના  દિવસે નોર્થ વેસ્ટ એરલાઇન્સની અમેરિકા તરફ આવતી ફ્લાઇટને ઉમર ફારૂખ અબ્દુલમુતલ્લબ નામના એક યુવાને ઊડાવી દેવાનો નિષ્ફળ પ્રયત્ન કર્યો. આમ જુઓ તો આ બંને ઘટના વચ્ચે દેખીતો કોઇ સંબંધ નથી. પરંતુ, બીજી રીતે જુઓ તો આ બંને એક જ આતંકવાદી ગુરૂના ચેલા છે.

અમેરિકાએ એ આતંકવાદી ‘ધર્મગુરૂ’ (ભૂતપૂર્વ ઇમામ) અનવર અલ ઔલાકીને પણ આંતરરાષ્ટ્રીય ગુનેગાર જાહેર કર્યો છે. ૧૯૭૧ના એપ્રિલની ૨૨મીએ મેક્સિકોમાં જન્મેલા ફક્ત ૩૮ વરસના આ ઇમામે ઘણા સરફિરા આતંકવાદીને માત્ર પોતાના પ્રવચનથી આત્મઘાતી બનવાની પ્રેરણા આપી હતી. એક માણસ કેટલું ઝેર પોતાની વાણી દ્વારા ફેલાવી શકે એનો આ વિરલ દાખલો છે. જો આ જ ધર્મ હોય તો અધર્મ કોને કહેવો એ એક કૂટપ્રશ્ન બની રહે.

અમેરિકા અને યૂરોપના દેશો અનવરને ‘બિન લાદેન ઑફ ઇન્ટરનેટ’ તરીકે ઓળખે છે. સિવિલ એંજિનિયરની ડિગ્રી ધરાવતા અનવરનો યમનની ઇમામ યુનિવર્સિટી સાથે સંબંધ છે. આ યુનિવર્સિટીએ એને ઇમામ તરીકેની ડિગ્રી આપી હતી. આ યુનિવર્સિટીના વડા અલ કાયદાના ખેર ખાં ગણાતા અબ્દુલ મજિદ અલ-ઝિન્દાની છે. અમેરિકા પર થયેલા ૯-૧૧ના હુમલાના સૂત્રધારોએ અનવરનાં ‘ધાર્મિક વ્યાખ્યાનો’ સાંભળ્યાં હતાં.

એજ રીતે મેજર નિદાલ મલિક હસને ઇન્ટરનેટ પર અનવરનાં પ્રવચનો સાંભળ્યા હતા. કેટલાક લોકોના અવાજમાં જાદુ હોય છે. આષાઠી કંઠ ધરાવતા કે ખરજનો ઘેરો કંઠ ધરાવતા લોકો ઘણીવાર અનાયાસે સાંભળનારને હિપ્નોટાઇઝ કરે છે. તેમની વાણીમાં સંમોહિત કરવાની શક્તિ રહેલી હોય છે. અનવરની વાણી એવી છે. નોર્થ વેસ્ટ એરલાઇન્સના વિમાનને ૩૦૦ ઉતારૂ સાથે ઊડાવી દેવાની પેરવી કરનારા અબ્દુલમુતલ્લબે પણ અનવરનાં પ્રવચનો સાંભળીને આતંકવાદ અપનાવ્યો હતો.

અમારે ત્યાં ઓસામા બિન લાદેન કે મુંબઇ પરના હુમલામાં સંડોવાયેલા કોઇ આતંકવાદી નથી એવાં બેસૂરાં ગાણાં પાકિસ્તાન ગાય છે એ રીતે યમને અમેરિકાને કહી દીઘું કે અમારે ત્યાં અનવર અલ-ઐાલાકી નામનો કોઇ માણસ નથી. જો કે અવારનવાર અનવર અરબી પ્રેસનેે યમનમાં બેઠાં બેઠાં ઇન્ટરવ્યૂ આપે છે પરંતુ યમન સરકાર કે તેની પોલીસને એ શોઘ્યો જડતો નથી, બોલો ! આ માણસે અમેરિકાની એક કરતાં વઘુ મસ્જિદમાં ઇમામ તરીકેની સેવા આપી હતી અને ભડકામણાં પ્રવચનો કર્યાં હતાં ત્યારે અમેરિકા ગાઢ ઊંઘમાં હતું. જાગ્યું ત્યારે ઔલાકી નૌ દો ગ્યારહ થઇ ગયો હતો. અહીં યાદ રહે કે ઓસામા બિન લાદેન અને લેટેસ્ટ ડેવિડ હેડલી કે તહવ્વુર રાણા એક સમયે અમેરિકી સીઆઇએના પગારદાર નોકર હતા. આજે એ જ સાપ અમેરિકાનું દૂધ પીને અમેરિકાને ડસે છે ત્યારે અમેરિકા એમને પકડીને સજા કરવા તડપે છે. આને કહેવાય વિધિની વક્રતા !

અનવર શરૂમાં કોલોરાડોમાં ફોર્ટ કોલીન્સની અને ત્યારબાદ કેલિફોર્નિયામાં સાન ડિયેગોની મસ્જિદ અર-રિબાત અલ-ઇસ્લામીમાં ઇમામ તરીકે ફરજ બજાવી ચૂક્યો હતો. કેલિફોર્નિયામાં તો ૧૯૯૬ થી ૨૦૦૦ સુધી હતો. ૯૮-૯૯માં ખુદ એફબીઆઇએ જેને ચેરિટેબલ સોસાયટી ફોર સોશ્યલ વેલફેર (સીએસએસડબલ્યૂ)નો ઉપપ્રમુખ ગણાવ્યો હતો. આ સંસ્થા યમનની ઇમામ યુનિવર્સિટીના વડા અબ્દુલ મજિદ અલ-ઝિન્દાનીએ સ્થાપી હતી અને એ વેશ્યાઓના હિત માટે કામ કરે છે.

સમાજ સેવાના અંચળા હેઠળ આ સંસ્થા આતંકવાદી પ્રવૃત્તિ માટે પૈસા ભેગા કરે છે એવું એફબીઆઇના એજન્ટ બ્રાયન મર્ફીએ કોર્ટને જણાવ્યું હતું. ખરી રસપ્રદ વાત તો હવે આવે છે. ૯-૧૧ના બે આતંકવાદી (નવાફ અલ-હાઝમી અને ખાલિદ અલમિંધર)ને એફબીઆઇ સાથે સીધો સંબંધ હતો એમ એક સાક્ષીએ ૨૦૦૦ની સાલમાં કોર્ટમાં કહ્યું હતું. આ બંને પણ ઐાલાકીના શાગિર્દ હતા અને સાન ડિયેગોમાં મસ્જિદ અલ ઐાલાકીમાં નમાજ પઢવા જતા હતા. આ બંને જણ ઔલાકી સાથે બંધ બારણે બેઠકો યોજતા હતા એટલે એમ માની શકાય કે ઔલાકીને ૯-૧૧ હુમલાની આગોતરી જાણ હતી.

છેલ્લે છેલ્લે ઐાલાકીએ વૉશિંગ્ટનમાં દાર-અલ હિજરાહ મસ્જિદના ઇમામ તરીકે સેવા આપી હતી. આ માણસ અલ કાયદાનો મહત્ત્વનો માણસ હતો અને અમેરિકામાં બેઠાં બેઠાં અમેરિકાને ટાપલાં મારતો હતો છતાં દુનિયાની સૌથી કાબેલ જાસૂસી સંસ્થા ધરાવવાનો ફાંકો રાખતા અમેરિકાને એનાં કાળાં કરતૂતોની ખબર નહોતી, બોલો ! આ વિશે વઘુ ફરી ક્યારેક.

Obama backs Mosque near ground zero , Wake Up America. BowObama Showing True Colors.

 Sam Hindu: This is HOw Muslims Think.. Wake up America.

Friday, August 13, 2010

Obama backs Mosque near ground zero

President Barack Obama on Friday forcefully endorsed building a mosque near ground zero, saying the country’s founding principles demanded no less.

“As a citizen, and as president, I believe that Muslims have the same right to practice their religion as anyone else in this country,” Obama said, weighing in for the first time on a controversy that has riven New York and the nation.

“That includes the right to build a place of worship and a community center on private property in lower Manhattan, in accordance with local laws and ordinances,” he said. “This is America, and our commitment to religious freedom must be unshakable.”

Obama made the comments at an annual dinner in the White House State Dining Room celebrating the Islamic holy month of Ramadan.

Obama elevated it to a presidential issue Friday without equivocation.

While insisting that the place where the twin towers once stood was indeed “hallowed ground,” Obama said that the proper way to honor it was to apply American values.

“Our capacity to show not merely tolerance, but respect to those who are different from us — a way of life that stands in stark contrast to the nihilism of those who attacked us on that September morning, and who continue to plot against us today,” he said.


Ali Sina on Ground Zero Mosque, Cordova House

On 9/11 2001, Muslim jihadists butchered 3000 Americans.  Nine years later, a Muslim Imam wants to build a 13 story monument two blocks away from the site of that carnage.

Many Americans, particularly the New Yorkers and the families of the victims of that tragedy are outraged at the insensitivity, bordering arrogance of Faisal Abdul Rauf, the imam behind this project.  Rauf says it is not a mosque but an Islamic center. The name does not change anything. Whatever you call it, it is of extreme poor judgment.

In 2004, Rauf published a book calling it “What is Right with Islam is What is Right with America.”  In that book he argued “The American political structure is Sharia compliant. For America to score even higher on the ‘Islamic’ or ‘Sharia compliance’ scale America would need to do two things. Invite the voices of all religions in shaping the nations’ practical life, and allow religious communities more leeway to judge among themselves according to their own laws.”    

The truth is that the American constitution and the Sharia law are opposite of each other. It is interesting however, how Rauf composed his statement.  He did not say that the Sharia is in compliance with the US constitution, but the other way round. By doing so he wanted to establish the superiority of the Sharia over the US constitution.  

The fact is that the American Constitution and the Sharia differ fundamentally. For example, the Sharia does not recognize

  • Freedom of speech,
  • Freedom of conscience
  • Equality of all people before the law
  • Equality of the rights of women with men


Of course, as an Imam he can’t reject the Sharia. He will reject the constitution when not in compliance with the Sharia.   

There is nothing in the constitution of the USA that is in agreement with the Sharia law.  You cannot find two documents more diametrically opposed to each other. 

Think about stoning the adulterers, killing the apostates, hanging or beheading the homosexuals, chopping the hands of the thief, imposing a dress code on people and flogging them for consuming alcohol. These are all part of the Sharia law and against the Constitution. You can’t serve two masters. Muslims will have to either submit to the Sharia law or to the US constitution.  If they submit to one, they are in violation of the other.  

But the disturbing part in Rauf’s statement is the fact that he compares Islamic laws with the secular laws of America. This is proof that his goal is to supplant the latter with the former.  Statements such as this make it clear that the ambition of Muslims in America is political. 

Rauf ignores the fact the in the USA religion and state are kept apart.  When he says “America would need invite the voices of all religions in shaping the nations’ practical life, and allow religious communities more leeway to judge among themselves according to their own laws,” he is not talking about Jews, Christians or other religions. In fact adherents of these faiths want to keep state and religion separate. Rauf wants these rights solely for Muslims.  He aspires to convert America into an Islamic theocracy.   

The Sharia law does not just regulate the rights of the Muslims but also the non-Muslims must submit to it.  How is that going to work according to this imam? Well that part will have to wait until Muslims become the majority and convert America into a Sharia compliant state, like Saudi Arabia.  Then no one has any right anymore. 

As far as Muslims are concerned the Sharia law is from God and it supersedes all constitutions that are written by men.   

The implication is grave. It means that Muslims who uphold the Sharia law are a subversive group whose aim is to destroy our system of government.  Muslims present Islam as a religion whereas their agenda is political and subversive. 

When in 2007, Rauf published his book in the Muslims world, he did not call it What is Right with America is What is Right with Islam. He called it A Call to Prayer from the WTC rubbles: Islamic Da’wa from the Heart of America Post 9/11

This is the kind of talk that resonates in Muslim world. The message that Rauf wants to send to Americans is that the Sharia is very similar to their constitution and hence they should not fear Islam. But his message to his fellow coreligionists is different.  To them he is announcing that a da’wa is being issued to Americans from the rubbles of 9/11. 

What is Da’wa?  Da’wa means invitations to submit to Islam. Jihad has two phases.  The first phase is the invitation. Disbelievers are to be warned first and given a chance to submit. If they refuse the next stage is qital (fighting). Da’wa and qital are integral parts of jihad. 

The Cordova House will be the ultimatum, a line drawn in the sand for the Americans. After the da’wa is issued, Americans will have two choices: They must either submit to Islam or face more terrorism.


What is in the name? 

The choice of the name is also significant.  Cordova House may mean nothing to Americans, but for Muslims it is fraught with meaning. 

Cordova is a city in south Spain. Muslims armies invaded Spain in 711, massacring countless people. Then they converted the biggest church in Cordova into a mosque.

Building mosques over churches, synagogues and temples of the conquered people began during the life of Muhammad who converted the temple of the Arabs in Mecca into an Islamic mosque.   

Muslims have been doing the same ever since.  Numerous Hindu temples, churches, synagogues and Zoroastrian temples were converted into mosques. The objective is twofold” To humiliate the defeated people and to establish the supremacy of Islam.

The mosque over the temple of Solomon in Jerusalem is one example. When Muslims conquered the Byzantine Empire they converted the biggest church in the Christian empire into a mosque.   In India over 5000 mosques are built on Hindu temples

A mosque, a place from which da’wa is issued, built over the rubbles of the WTC is a hint to Muslims that jihad is on the march and that Islam is advancing and conquering new territories.  The conquest of Cordova ushered Muslims into an era of opulence, the so called Golden Age of Islam. It is therefore a symbol of Islamic conquest and supremacy, which Muslims recall nostalgically.



Who is Faisal Abdul Rauf? 

Imam Rauf tries to present himself as a moderate Muslim. Far from it! He has made statements that show he has very radical views. Right after 9/11 Rauf blamed the victims and said, “United States policies were an accessory to the crime that happened on 9/11.” 

He also said “We [Americans] have been an accessory to a lot of innocent lives dying in the world. In fact, in the most direct sense, Osama bin Laded was made in the USA.”  

Rauf supports Muslim Brotherhood, the same group that wants to destroy America from within, and has nerve condemned Hezbollah or Hamas terrorist organizations. 

In October 2009, the Former Muslims United sent Rauf and his wife the Pledge of Freedom that states Muslims should not be killed if they choose to leave Islam.  The couple refused to sign it. So much for their tolerance!  Also he has never made it public where the $100 million dollars financing comes from. 

There are 2300 mosques in the USA and over 200 in New York.  There is no need for another one, especially in the proximity of where Muslims massacred thousands of Americans.  Why this place?   The choice of the Ground Zero is no accident. Muslims have chosen this spot to a) thumb their nose at Americans and at the families of the victims and b) send a message to Muslim world announcing Islam’s victory over the “Great Satan.” 

The Cordova House will have a huge symbolic significance for Muslims and it encourages them to enlist in jihad and make the ultimate objective of Islam, which is world domination come true. 

Rauf is not a man of peace. He has made very inflammatory comments, such as “one man’s terrorist is another man’s hero.”   

In an article entitled, “Sharing the Essence of Our Beliefs,” published in the Al-Ghad Newspaper in Jordan, 5/9/2009, translated by Walid Shoebat, Rauf wrote:

If someone in the Middle East cries out, “where is the law”, he knows that the law existsThe only law that the Muslim needs exists already in the Koran and the Hadith. 

People asked me right after the 9/11 attack as to why do movements with political agendas carry [Islamic] religious names? Why call it ‘Muslim Brotherhood’ or ‘Hezbollah (Party of Allah)’ or ‘Hamas’ or ‘Islamic Resistance Movement’? I answer them this—that the trend towards Islamic law and justice begins in religious movements, because secularism has failed to deliver what the Muslim wants, which is life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.” 

Rauf is not talking about life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness for all the people. According to Islam these rights belong only to Muslims. The non-Muslims must suffer defeat, ignominy and dhimmitude.  

Follow the Money Trail 

Why would Mayor Bloomberg and the majority of the council members of the New York City support such an offensive project? The answer is, follow the money trail.   

I am not accusing anyone, but my hunch tells me to be suspicious of anyone who strongly defends Islamic interests over the interests of his own country.   

The Saudi and the Iranian regimes spend large sums of money buying the loyalty of politicians and the academicians in the west.  The western supporters of Islam are not often mere useful idiots. In many cases they are well paid traitors.  

An example that comes to mind is the US congressman Mark D. Siljander who began his career as a zealous evangelical Christian and then went on to write a book, A Deadly Misunderstanding, to “bridge the Muslim-Christian divide.”  He argued that Christian and Muslim religious texts are surprisingly compatible, when studied in their original languages. This is of course a blatant lie. The truth came out on July 7, 2010, when Siljander pleaded guilty to two counts of receiving money from Muslims and supporting Muslim terrorists.  He was indicted in January 2008 on charges of money laundering, conspiracy and obstruction of justice. 

Throughout the history, Islamic forces have deceived their victims, making them think Islam and Muslims are peace-loving, only later to find the opposite. Another example of this deception/treason happened in A.D. 635 when Damascus fell to Muslims because they deceived and bribed its Bishop who opened the city gates at night.  

Anytime a politician defends Islam under the guise of “tolerance” and “community cohesion,” I think about money.  Chances are you’ll find a skeleton in their closet. I am not accusing anyone in particular. I don’t know the facts. But I won’t be surprised if one day we find out that the politicians who defend the construction of this Islam Trojan horse on Ground Zero were paid for their support. 

Mayor Bloomberg calls patriotic Americans who don’t want this mosque, “un-American.” He should know that it is very American to defend the American constitution against any creeping alien ideology whose adherents do not hide their intention to bring down America and “sabotage its miserable house from within.”   What is un-American is to open the gates of the country to its sworn enemies.  Whether the Mayor is bribed, or he is merely a useful idiot is not for me to decide. It is one or the other and in either case he is not qualfied to be the mayor of New York. But one thing is certain and that is his support for Islamists against the interests of America is very un-American.

In Pakistan, women are called awra. or Aurat means Vagina..

SOME TIMES BY  ; SAM HINDU    August 6 at 12:01pm
Only thing Islam Invented is in the picture.. Oooops that is also infidel invention.. my mistake..

Women in Islam are seen as sexual beings. Every part of their body is thought to be erotic. Every square inch of her, is sexual. She must cover from head to toe, because her entire body is perceived to be private parts.

In Pakistan, women are called awra. Awra or aurat means the part of the body that has to be covered. Exposing the Awra is unlawful in Islam and is regarded as sin. Etymologically, the term Awra derives from the root ‘a-w-r which means “defectiveness”, “imperfection”, “blemish” or “weakness” – however the most common English translation is “nakedness”.

The Islamic regime of Iran calls women zaifeh. It’s the feminine for “weak.” This implies also mental weakness since according to Muhammad women are deficient in intelligence. This sums up the status of woman in Islam. You can’t be more explicit than this.

In a society that women are seen as weak, defective and private part, any contact that they may have with men is deemed to be sexual and unlawful.

Women in Muslim countries are segregated.  From the very childhood boys and girls are kept apart. They don’t play with each other, don’t go to school with each other, .

A Muslim woman’s entire body is private part. So if you shake hand with her it is the same as touching her crotch. If she displays her hair, it is as exposing her pubic hair.  Everything in her is sexual and private part.

In Islam women are the namoos (ناموس) of their male relatives. Namoos can be roughly translated as honor, but with a sexual connotation. The namoos of a Muslim hinges on protecting his female kin from prying eyes.

 If a woman displays her beauty or talks to a stranger man, the namoos of all her male relatives is injured. The only way to redeem an injured namoos is to wash the stain with blood.

Patriarchal societies produce men with devalued sense of self. Therefore, a Muslim man’s “honor,” depends almost entirely on how he can keep his female dependants under leash.

 Should he fail to do that he is shamed. He knows that everyone will be talking about him and laughing at him behind his back.

He can restore his namoos by killing the woman who has been “defiled.” The Islamic society does not look down at such a man, but rather he is lionized as having ghairat (pride, sense of honor).

The question is how to stop this insanity. Now that we know the root cause of this problem the answer is obvious. The problem is Islamic misogyny.

We can’t expect more from a society that treats its women as deficient in intelligence, weak and a defective thing that has to covered. Where women are dehumanized and sexualized honor killing is the outcome.

In Islam, the age of Maturity for a girl is 9 years and for a Boy is 15 years. This means that a 9-year-old girl and a 15-year-old  boy are considered to have the same level of maturity.

Now, if girl reaches Maturity Six years earlier than Boy, Then why did God place men in charge of women? Was there something wrong with God’s Judgment?

Honor killing is not the only problem affecting Islamic countries. Dictatorship, violence, terrorism, poverty, human rights abuses, and a host of other problems that are endemic in Muslim countries are all due to teachings of Islam.

 Muslims do Honor Killing of their own Daughters or Sisters which is Horrible act of Killing, Some one please Explain me what is Honor in Killing your own family members ?

The Qur’an likens a woman to a field (tilth), to be used by a man as he wills: “Your women are a tilth for you (to cultivate) so go to your tilth as ye will” (2:223).

The Qur’an also declares that a woman’s testimony is worth half that of a man: “Get two witnesses, out of your own men, and if there are not two men, then a man and two women, such as ye choose, for witnesses, so that if one of them errs, the other can remind her” (2:282).

It allows men to marry up to four wives, and have sex with slave girls also: “If ye fear that ye shall not be able to deal justly with the orphans, marry women of your choice, two or three or four; but if ye fear that ye shall not be able to deal justly (with them), then only one, or (a captive) that your right hands possess, that will be more suitable, to prevent you from doing injustice” (4:3).

It rules that a son’s inheritance should be twice the size of that of a daughter: “Allah (thus) directs you as regards your children’s (inheritance): to the male, a portion equal to that of two females” (4:11).

Worst of all, the Koran tells husbands to beat their disobedient wives: “Men are in charge of women, because Allah hath made the one of them to excel the other, and because they spend of their property (for the support of women). So good women are the obedient, guarding in secret that which Allah hath guarded. As for those from whom ye fear rebellion, admonish them and banish them to beds apart, and scourge them” (4:34).

It allows for marriage to pre-pubescent girls, stipulating that Islamic divorce procedures “shall apply to those who have not yet menstruate” (65:4). 

Muslim don’t take pride in education or achievements and to strive for excellence in science but their pride is between two legs of their own female members instead between two ears..pathetic..

There is one obvious solution for all these problems, but it is politically incorrect to say it. The problem is Islam, and the solution is to get rid of it. This required telling the truth about this faith and criticizing it in the same way that Christianity and all other faiths have been criticized.

 However, while it is okay for Moslims  to criticize every other faith on earth ,but  criticizing Islam AND MOHAMMAD’S ACT  is big no no.  Ride on the same bus WITH fellow citizen who happens to be female is taboo.,

 And don’t shake hand or have eye contact. Any contact with women can arouse the filthy  Moslim men sexually, which would not only cause him to sin and he can rape , but also would dishonor her male relatives.

The Quran (4:34) says men are in charge of women. The same verse says “good women are the obedient, guarding in secret that which Allah hath guarded.”

The secret is their awra. Since in Islam the woman’s whole body is considered to be sexual, they must cover every part of their body and avoid contact with stranger men. Verse 24:31 says believing women must lower their gaze, be modest and they should draw their veils over their bosoms and not display their beauty to strangers.

In the west, one can shake hand with a woman, dance with her and even kiss her on the cheek, and none of that is considered to be sexual.

A (good) Moslem has to be a Terrorist!


A Moderate Moslem is one who has not decided it was their time to JIHAD for the sake of ALLAH just yet..that is all a Moderate Moslem is..WAKE UP AMERICA Jihad is OBLIGATORY of ALL MOSLEMS! Az-Zuhri said, “Jihad is required from every person, whether he actually joins the fighting or remains behind.

If we define good Christians, and good Jews as those who follow the teachings of the Gospel and the Bible respectively, then good Moslems are those who follow the teachings of the Quran. Now if the teachings of the Quran call for violence against non-Moslems, then “good” Moslems have no choice but to become terrorists. The following are only few of the Quranic verses that call for violence against non-Moslems. Let’s look at some of these verses: Al Baqara :2(244), Al-Nisa’4(76,77,84,89), Al-Anfal 8(12,39), Al-Tawba 9:(5,14,29), 9(88,112,123), 47(4). All call to fight non-Moslems until all religion is that of Allah, or fight in Allah’s cause (Jihad), or to kill them wherever you find them until they pay Gezya submissively, which is a specially designed humiliating tax used only against non-Moslems. These verses are also augmented by many similar instructions in the Hadiths like: In Bukhari V4B53N386: “We are ordered to fight you until you submit to Islam or pay Gezya with submission”, or in Muslim, C9B1N31: “I have been commanded to fight people until they say no God but Allah, and Mohammad his only messenger”. The 1982 Mecca Islamic summit Conference confirmed the above when they declared that Jihad is a duty of every Moslem where ever they are.
Most Moslem apologists do not quote the above verses, but rather use few verses that were “inspired” much earlier like Al-Baqara (2:256), Al-Kahf (18:29) and Al-Kafirun (109:6), which call for tolerance of other religions. The fact remains though, that these verses were “inspired” much earlier when the Moslems were weak and they were abrogated by the above verses that call for violence, as many Islamic prominent scholars can confirm, like Al- Suyuti and Al-Qurtubi. This should explain the declarations of many of al-Qaeda leaders like Abu Misab al-Zarqawi in Iraq who confirmed that “we are only obeying the Quranic verses that demand the practice of violence against non-Moslems”, and that verses for violence have abrogated all verses that call for tolerance. This attitude explains all those unprovoked attacks against non-Moslems all over the world or even against Moslems that oppose violence. It should further explain the burning of churches in many countries in the world. Most non speaking Arabic Moslems are not told the truth about violence; actually they are deceived in many instances when it comes to translation of the Quran, especially when the Quran contradicts simple science, history and general logic. One example is when you look up in Al-Azhar (the highest Moslem authority on earth) website the Quranic Arabic verse 23:14, then look at the English translation right under it, to find out that the “many creators” stated in the original Arabic verse is translated to the “one unique creator”, as it would be very embarrassing to tell the truth!
Does this mean that all Moslems are terrorists? Of course not as most of them abhor and condemn publicly all perpetrated violence against non-Moslems, but with their entire adherence to the daily prayers notwithstanding, they are not considered good Moslems, because they are not practicing all the obvious instructions of the Quran. Strangely they do not support the removal of these verses that call for violence, because they would not dare to venture into changing the “words of God”. What could be done?
All Moslems that oppose violence even if it was emphasized repeatedly in the Quran have the immediate and urgent duty to demand from all Islamic authorities, especially from all future international Islamic conferences to espouse firmly a resolution that abrogate in effect all Quranic verses that call for violence and consider them as needed contingencies of the past and no longer valid for the present. It takes a lot of courage to do that since the Islamic authority have the means to discredit , fight and even demand death for anyone that call for such a change.

%d bloggers like this: