How to debate with Muslim or Moslim?

Once you know something about Islam and try to talk to others, you may find yourself in a debate. Here are some of the “standards”.

Everyone from Muslims to atheists uses this. The implication is that Arabic is a unique language that can’t be translated and therefore, how could you know what you are talking about? First, the Koran claims to be a universal message for all humanity for all times. If the message is universal, then it must be able to be understood by all. If the message cannot be understood by everybody, then by definition it is not universal. So, which is it?

Another thing to consider is that over half of the Koran is about kafirs and politics. Do you really think that a political message about a kafir cannot be understood by the kafir? If so, what is that message that cannot be understood?

It must be made clear which Arabic is being spoken about. The Arabic of the Koran is classical Arabic which is about as similar to modern Arabic as the English of Chaucer and Beowulf is similar to modern English. Said in another way, not even a modern Arab can read classical Arabic. It is estimated that fewer than a thousand scholars who read classical Arabic can compose a paragraph on a random topic.

And what about the nearly billion Muslims who don’t even understand modern Arabic? If it is necessary to understand classical Arabic to understand what the Koran is about, then how can those billion non-Arabic-speaking Muslims understand the Koran? And if they cannot understand the Koran how can they be Muslims?

Ask the person who presents the argument if they have any opinions about the doctrine of Christianity. Then ask them if they read Hebrew, Aramaic or Biblical Greek? If they do not read those languages how can they form an opinion about something they have to read in translation? Of course they can read it and form an opinion, the same way we can read and understand the Koran.

A secondary question is why would anyone want to believe that the Koran couldn’t be understood? What is the purpose of believing that out of all the books in the world, why would there be one that cannot be translated?

The Koran is only 18% of the total doctrine. Would the questioner believe that the other 82% of the doctrine not be understood as well?

This response usually comes after some grim facts are given about Islam. This is probably the most common response from non-Christians. The best response is to ask if they have a reason that they don’t want to talk about Islam, since they want to change the subject. The average person knows next to nothing about Islam and sometimes this gambit is merely a way to steer the conversation into a familiar ground.

They are just trying to prove that Islam is not any worse than Christianity. At this point, welcome the chance to compare the two. Choose the ground of comparison. The best place to start is the founders. Compare Mohammed to Christ. The other good comparison is in ethics. Compare Islam’s dualistic ethics to unitary Golden Rule ethics.

Another version of this is that the person will compare some failed Christian to a “good” Muslim they know at work. It is fairly useless to do personal comparisons. How do you choose which Muslim out of 1.5 billion Muslims and which Christian do you choose out of a couple billion Christians?

A variation on the “Well, the Christians did …” is “What about the Crusades”? This is the time to say you welcome a comparison of the Crusades to jihad. Start with the question of why the Crusades were needed. Islamic jihad caused the invasion of the Middle East. The Crusades were a response to a cry for help by the tortured and oppressed Christians in their native land. Did the Christians do some very wrong things? Yes, but notice that the Crusades have been over nearly a thousand years. Jihad is active today. And while we are at it, why do academic libraries have many books on the Crusades, which lasted only 200 years, and so few on jihad, which has lasted 1400 years? The West has analyzed the Crusades forever and has never analyzed jihad.

Why is the Muslim your friend knows the only Muslim out of 1.5 billion that makes him the expert on Islam? Remember, the average Muslim knows very little about the doctrine of Islam. Why? Because, historically the imams have acted as the high priests of Islam and they have never made the doctrine simple to understand. That is one way they keep their prestige and power.

But once you know something about the doctrine, you can say that you know also know a Muslim, and his name is Mohammed, and what you say comes from the Sunna. In short, your Muslim, Mohammed, can beat your friend’s Muslim on any issue of doctrine. If the Muslim your friend knows says something about Islam that agrees with Mohammed, then it is right. If what he says contradicts Mohammed, then he is wrong. So this Muslim your friend knows is either wrong or redundant, but never more right than Mohammed.

Probably so. What does that prove about Islam? He may follow the Golden Rule and not Islam. That is, he may be a poor Muslim and a good person.

Now is the time to explain about the Islam of Mecca and the Islam of Medina and which one is the more powerful. It is also time to explain about dualism and how Islam always has two faces.

Stay with doctrine and history of Islam, never get personal and talk about an individual Muslim. Actually, there is one way to talk about any Muslim, show how what they do and say follows the doctrine.

Besides, you know this Muslim and his name is Mohammed. Don’t talk about “Muslims,” talk about Mohammed.

If you are quoting the Koran or the Sunna, then it is the real Islam, by definition. The Koran and the Sunna are Islam, the real Islam. All other Islam, such as is found in the media, is the false Islam. There is only one real Islam, the doctrine of Islam.

This comes after you have revealed some horrific part of the doctrine. What do Muslims call themselves? The believers. What do they believe? The Koran and the Sunna. They say that is what they believe. Really believe.

This is a restating of, “I know this Muslim and he is good man.” He may be a poor Muslim and a good man who follows the Golden Rule.

But, the statement shows that there is no understanding of the duality of Islam. The Koran has both violence and tolerance against the kafirs. Today in America the power of Islam is just getting started, so Islam is still weak. When Mohammed was weak in Mecca, he did not kill anybody. Islam is still in the first phase of jihad here.

But the Koran says that one Muslim can beat two kafirs. It also says that Islam must be the dominant political system. So when Muslims reach a third of the population (that makes it 2 to 1), they will be in the full stage of Medina and violence becomes a standard operation. But even then, we know from the Sira, that many Muslims just don’t have the stomach for the violence. The Sira shows that Muslims can support jihad many ways, besides personal violence. The “peaceful” Muslim you know is commanded to give money to Islamic charities and the charities give the money to the actual fighters.

Look at the violence in the Old Testament. It has two qualities—local and temporary. None of the violence is commanded to be global and eternal. In each case the violence is directed in a political struggle and when it was over it was over.

The violence in the Trilogy is for all Muslims, in all places and for all time. Jihad is to stop only when every kafir submits. Look at Mohammed, the perfect example. He was involved with violence until the day he died. And on his deathbed he directed eternal violence against the kafirs when he said in his last breath: “Let there be neither Christian or Jew left in Arabia.”

The Sira records that when Islam committed violence, it attracted new followers. As Osama bin Laden says: “People like a winning horse.” After 9/11 in the US, new followers joined Islam. Communism was a political system that preached, promised and delivered violence and it attracted many people. Many people love violence. Have you never paid any attention to Hollywood? Violence is piled upon violence and people line up to see it.

Islam is growing rapidly. but most of the growth can be attributed to high birth rates, not conversion. Islam’s growth in kafir countries is due to immigration, not conversion.

1. A Federal prosecutor may be in trouble because he’s a smart, successful kafir.

2. Jihad against the Christians at the highest level!  A Common Word is supreme jihad by Islamic scholars and the Muslim Brotherhood, championed by the usual dhimmi suspects at Yale, Harvard and Princeton Divinity Schools. Here’s the brilliant rebuttal by knowledgeable kafirs to this taqiyya-fest titled, “Truth About A Common Word.”

3. The Muslim Brotherhood supreme guide in Egypt on Bin Laden the jihad fighter, Sharia law and various other hot Islamic political topics. From

The differences in the different kinds of Islam are due to religion, not politics. Take the Sunni/Shia split, the largest division in Islam. Both Sunnis and Shias completely agree on how to treat kafirs and jihad. All Muslim subscribe to one of five schools of the Sharia and the Sharia’s position regarding kafirs and jihad is the nearly the same for all the schools.

The only big difference is whether to use violent jihad or peaceful jihad against the kafirs.

If you quote a hadith to a Muslim and they don’t like it, they will say, “Well, some of those hadiths are not acceptable (or true or some other disclaimer).” And that is true. Actually, when a Muslim says that, they are practicing taqiyya, sacred deception and duality. If it is a hadith, then a Muslim cannot be denied the right to follow it. It is Sunna.

The hadiths from Bukhari and Muslim are the creme de la creme of hadiths. When Bukhari made his collection, he threw out 99% of those he found. Those 99% are the unsure ones, the other 1% which are used here are authoritative.

The core of the myth is told in the Koran about how Adam built the Kabah at Mecca. It was the first house of worship. Then Abraham brought Ishmael to Mecca, prepared to perform the sacrifice demanded by God. Ishmael was left in Mecca with his mother, Hagar.

We have a very detailed report of Mecca at the time of Mohammed right down to the names of individuals, their children and wives. Arabs were very keen on family relationships. A person’s very name gave you his father’s or son’s name and a chain of relationships. One of the things that infuriated the Meccans about Mohammed was that he said their ancestors were in Hell since they were not Muslims.

Not a single person in Mohammed’s Mecca is named Abraham, Ishmael, or Hagar. Not one. Why? They had no knowledge about any relationship between the Arabs and Abraham. They knew of the Jews and Abraham, but they made no claim of kinship with their names. After Mohammed, these names became common amongst Muslims.

This has another large implication. Islam claims that Muslims, Christians and Jews are members of the Abrahamic faith. Not so. There is no such thing. It was an unsubstantiated claim by Mohammed.

If you spend any time talking about Islam you will hear: “What about the greatness of the Islamic Golden Age? Why, the West got all of its real learning from the Muslims. They preserved the Greek philosophers, invented algebra, chemistry, the algorithm and laid the basis of our learning.” Or: “The high point of human civilization occurred in Baghdad and Moorish Spain. It was all peace and harmony with Christians, Jews and Muslims living in multi-cultural compatibility.”

“When Europe was mired in the Dark Ages, Islam was a shining light on the hill. “

Hmmm. Let’s go over the data. Notice that the best of Islam is compared with the worst of the West. First, there never was a “Dark Age”. This prejudicial naming came from the time of the Renaissance when they looked back at the dogmatic approach to knowledge in medieval times and wanted to separate themselves from it. It is just like new rich wanting to shed their poor ancestry.

Let’s examine the Middle Ages for a moment and see how they came about. The collapse of Greek and Roman civilization came about from internal problems of too much wealth for too long. The ravages of the bubonic plague wiped out an estimated 30 to 60 percent of the European population, making it vulnerable to invasion. The annihilation of the centers of learning came from the jihad of Islam. So even if you want to use the term Dark Ages, at least recognize the influence of jihad.

And let’s look at how “un-dark” the “Dark Ages” were. Everyone agrees that the Renaissance was one of humanity’s great moments. But how did all of that greatness spring from the “Dark Ages”? You don’t get a champion racehorse from a plug mare. The Middle Ages were a time when the European man was created. The collapse of Roman central government allowed a new culture to emerge that was a fusion of Roman, Greek, Celtic and Germanic culture. Part of this culture was mechanical genius.

Europe was creating a new mind, the mind that would change the world by producing practical machines such as water mills and a thousand small improvements in daily life. The cathedrals were a stunning tribute to humanity and works of great beauty.Â
Without the Middle Ages there could not have been a Europe or a Renaissance.

Now look at the Golden Age of Islam in Baghdad. Where did it come from? Not from Islam. The Koran was the first book written in Arabia. Architecture in Arabia consisted of mud huts. Mohammed’s house was made from mud bricks; a man could touch the ceiling and a curtain served as a door. Arabic culture was barely iron age with its only art being poetry.

So where did the learning come from? Islam crushed the Christian, Zoroastrian, Buddhist and Hindu cultures and brought them all together in one culture. The scholars of these cultures were brought together and created an intellectual surge called the Islamic Golden Age. It was kafirs who created this so-called Golden Age while Islam took the credit. As an example, we call our numbers Arabic numerals. But the Arabs got them from the Hindus and took credit. We should call our numbers Hindu numerals.

It was Christian dhimmis who translated all of the Greek and Roman literature for their masters. Later, when this material was translated back into Greek and Latin, the Muslims got the credit for the work. In short, Islam got its knowledge just like it got its wealth— from theft and violence.

Islam cannot sustain any intellectual effort. Their own scholars cannot do the work due to the limitations of the dogma of Islamic thought.

And what were the Muslims able to do with this knowledge? Not much. What did they do with glass? Make pretty windows for the mosque. Europeans took glass and made microscopes and telescopes as well as stained glass. What did the Muslims do with mathematics? Not much. They combined the mathematics of the Greeks and Hindus and created algebra. And what did they do with algebra? Nothing. When it came back to Europe, the Europeans created calculus and physics.

A list of the great Arabic scholars reveals that many on the list were Christians with Arabic names. And the best of the Muslim scholars turned out not to be very Muslim and their works were later demolished by Muslims who were true to the real knowledge of Islam, the Koran.

Now let’s look at the great Moorish Spain. It was supposed to be a great center of multiculturalism. Of course, there was that day in Cordoba when the Muslims killed 8,000 Jews, but ignore that. What did Islam do as soon as it came to Spain? Shipped a thousand blondes off to be slaves in North Africa. But ignore that. Then there was the day when, after a battle against the Christian knights, they beheaded all the corpses and all the prisoners to build a hill of skulls. A Muslim then mounted the hill of skulls and issued the call to prayer. But ignore that.

How can any culture that makes slaves and dhimmis of all kafirs be called great? Simple. It served the needs of the groups that pushed the idea. It was Voltaire and Jewish scholars who created the idea of the Golden Age in Moorish Spain. Why? As an intellectual counterweight to the hated Catholic church. That propaganda attack survives today. It is the intellectuals who hate Christianity today, who push the same ideas.

If Islamic learning was so great, then where are the great Muslim scholars of today? No Islamic nation has ever had a Nobel prize in science. Not one. There have been eight Muslims who shared Nobel prizes in science, but it occurred in working in kafir nations and with kafir partners.

Bill Warner

Signup for our weekly newletter.

copyright 2008, CBSX, Inc. dba

Use this as you will, just do not edit and give us credit.



Some interesting facts about SHAH RUKH KHAN (SRK)

Subject: all Indians should boycott his films and throw him out if India

Some interesting facts about SHAH RUKH KHAN (SRK)

The computers recovered from the Bin Laden house by the US military have linked him connected him with Pakistani underworld don Ibrahim Dawood (India’s most wanted terrorist). He is on the Pakistani secret service ISI payroll and works from direct orders from Pakistani military hierarchy.

SRK has always been great admirer of late Osama Bin Laden. SRK was deeply saddened at the death of Osama Bin Laden. Deep down, he is very anti-American and anti-Indian. He had described Osama’s death by America as a “heinous act”!

SRK indoctrination took place through the fanatic Islamic preacher Dr. Zakir Naik (who has been banned from entering U.K. or the U.S.A for glorifying terrorism). SRK follows his ideology with great zeal and devotion. He openly practices Al Taqiyya (an Islamic doctrine of deception allows all the Muslims to blatantly lie and cheat non-Muslims in furtherance of Islam).

Before the Mumbai attack, SRK knew the top Mumbai terror suspect David Headley (born Daood Sayed Gilani and changed his name to David Headley; is a Chicago-based Pakistani American), who conspired with Lashkar-e-Taiba and, Pakistani secret service ISI officers to launch the 2008 Mumbai attacks and other terrorist activity. He changed his South-Asian name to an English name to hide his Pakistani-Muslim identity to make travel to India easier). After the Mumbai terrorist attack, when 200 people innocent Indians were butchered, by an attack lead by Pakistani Islamic terrorists in 2008, SRK has never openly condemned the Pakistani terrorists. He has never condemned other Islamic terrorists who murdered 3000 on 9/11 in New York, 200 in Madrid, 200 in Bali, Indonesia; and 350 in Beslan in Russia. Instead he has used ambiguous language such as “terrorists have no religion” when asked any direct question on the Mumbai bombings.

SRK works with Bollywood Producer Karim Morani whose name recently surfaced in the charge sheet filed by CBI in Indian 2G Telephone spectrum scam and was subsequently arrested by the Police. Morani also has stakes in Shah Rukh Khan’s IPL cricket team Kolkota Knight Riders. Morani is the key figure in running Ibrahim Dawood’s illegal betting syndicate in cricket. His paymaster, Ibrahim Dawood is itching to launch his illegal betting scam in the IPL. SRK is a die hard Islamist. In Feb, 2010 (post Mumbai attacks), SRK demonstrated his loyalty to his Pakistani pay masters when he openly supported inclusion of Pakistani cricketers in IPL. He backed out only when his house was attacked and he was asked to leave for Pakistan.

People in India are in a state of shock after the Times of India reported that new ISI chief Lt. Gen. Zahir-ul-Islam has direct links with SRK. A Pakistani defense analyst Ikram Sehgal told PTI that Zahir-ul-Islam’s father who was a brigadier in the Pakistan Army and Shah Nawaz Khan. SRK has a direct relationship with ISI chief through his late mother Lateef Fatima who was the adopted daughter of Shah Nawaz Khan. Post Bin Laden, the CIA are closing in on SRK, hence he has bought a 20 million pound apartment in Central London in the Park Lane area, thanks to funding from Ibrahim Dawood. He is desperately trying to claim asylum in the UK. He knows that it is only a matter of time before the CIA will get him.

Post 9/11, SKS’s recent work is all anti American as seen by the film “My Name is Khan”, where he portrays all American as being intolerant to muslims. Post Mumbai Pakistani Terrorist attack, to taunt the Hindu’s, he has made the film “RA One” with reference to Raavan – the demon king who opposed Lord Rama in the Hindu’s sacred Ramayaan.

Unlike spineless Indian Government, American government is determined to crush terrorism in this country with an iron hand. They are aware that their responsibility is to protect American citizens from terrorists. CIA know about SRK’s terrorist links and he always gets stopped when he tries to enter the USA. But the spineless Indian Government always intervenes and bails him out! The Law Enforcement agencies in the USA are naturally worried about the safety and security of their citizens. SRK may be a big name in India but he is always thoroughly (and rightly) searched and detained for several hours by the Department of Homeland Security because their computer creates alerts for top terrorists. Hence, in the latest bid to avoid the Department of Homeland Security checks, last week he tried to enter the USA on board private jet owned by the Ambani’s but he was still caught and detained for hours!

All Indian Americans believe that SRK should be kept well away from US soil. The Government of India should follow their example and throw this traitor out for good. Send him to Pakistan.

My blood is boiling

my blood is boiling as i m hearing the blast case in delhi…
 i think our government is blind as well as deaf…. they are just securing terrorists like afjal guru and amir ajmal kasab, while on the other hand they r fail to secure our protection,,,

 i think only the policy of “an eye for an eye” can protect us,,,
just kill the terrorists without any pity….
 just f**k them othewise they’ll F**k us,,,,,
the nerves of our government is full with dirty water instead of blood, so we have to do the job……
 aaj phir lalkara gaya hai apne watan ko,
 apne hindustan, apne gulshan ,apne chaman ko,
 ab dikha do yaaron, garmi unhe apne lahu ki,
 aur badh chalo aaj dushmano k daman ko…..

Photograph of Ajmal Kasab, one of the ten terr...

Image via Wikipedia

હિન્દી ફિલ્મોમાં મુસ્લિમવાદ

હિન્દી ફિલ્મોમાં મુસ્લિમવાદ. From by. Kalpesh Soni.

Posted on August 1, 2011
“અમે તો હિન્દુ-મુસલમાન એવો કોઈ ભેદભાવ રાખતા નથી. હુસેનચાચા શાકભાજીની લારી લઈને રોજ અમારા હિન્દુ વિસ્તારમાં આવે છે અને અમે તો એમને બે રુપિયા વધારે આપીને રાજી થઈએ છીએ.” “ઐયુબ-રીક્ષાવાળો અમારા બાળકોને ફુલની જેમ સાચવીને સ્કૂલે લઈ જાય છે અને લાવે છે” – સંકુચિત દૃષ્ટિવાળા ઘણા હિન્દુઓ આવું બોલે છે. વ્યાપક દૃષ્ટિએ જોતાં દરેક હિન્દુએ મુસલમાનને ત્રણ પ્રશ્નો પૂછવા જોઈએ:
1. શું એ ગાય અને વાછરડાને કાપીને ખાવાનું બંધ કરશે?
2. શું એ હિન્દુ છોકરીઓને ફસાવવાનું બંધ કરશે?
3. ‘ઈશ્વરના અનેક સ્વરૂપમાં માનતો હોવાથી હિન્દુ કાફર છે અને કાફરને મારી નાંખવાથી ખુદા રાજી . . થાય છે’ – આ વાત ખોટી છે એવું એ કહેશે?
. . ત્રણેયના જવાબો ‘ના’માં આવશે. હવે હિન્દુઓ વિચારે, કે એણે મુસલમાન સાથે કેટલો સંબંધ રાખવો!

‘થ્રી ઈડિયટ્સ’ – હિન્દુત્વની નજરે

‘થ્રી ઈડિયટ્સ’ ફિલ્મમાંનો એક ઈડિયટ એવા ફરહાનના મુસ્લિમ કુટુમ્બમાં પિતા-પુત્ર વચ્ચે શિક્ષણના પાયાના ખ્યાલો અંગેના જે મતભેદો બતાવ્યા છે એ હકીકતમાં ઉચ્ચ શિક્ષણ લઈ રહેલા હિન્દુ પરિવારોની સમસ્યા છે. ઑટો ગેરેજ, મકાનનું રંગરોગાન, ગાદલા-રજાઈ બનાવવા, ઈંડા-મરઘી ઉછેરવા જેવા નિમ્ન કક્ષાના ધંધામાં જોડાયેલા અને ભારતમાં બ્રિટિશ એજ્યુકેશન સીસ્ટમ લાગુ હોવાથી એને શંકાની નજરે જોતા તેમજ એ શિક્ષણ લેવાથી પ્રયત્નપૂર્વક દૂર રહેતા મુસલમાન સમાજના 2 ટકા મુસલમાનો પણ શિક્ષિત નથી તેથી તેઓના પરિવારોમાં આવા સભ્ય તેમજ શિક્ષિત સમાજને લગતા પ્રશ્નો ઉદ્ભવે એ શક્ય જ નથી. આમ છતાં આ ફિલ્મમાં આમીરખાન મુસ્લિમ પરિવારને એક આધુનિક પરિવાર તરીકે ઉપસાવે છે. જ્યારે રાજુના હિન્દુ પરિવારની ખુબ ભદ્દી મજાક ઉડાવી છે. હિન્દુ સ્ત્રી વેલણથી પતિની છાતીમાં ખંજવાળે છે એથી વેલણ સાથે ચોંટેલા છાતીના વાળના ગુચ્છા રોટલીમાં આવે છે – એવું બતાવ્યું છે. શું આપણી મા-બહેનો આવી રીતે રોટલી વણે છે? એ જ રીતે પરીક્ષા નજીક આવે છે ત્યારે હિન્દુઓ કેવી અંધશ્રદ્ધામાં રાચે છે, એવું અનેક દૃશ્યો આપીને બતાવ્યું છે. એની સરખામણીમાં અભણ મુસ્લિમસમાજમાં વહેમો, અંધશ્રદ્ધા તેમજ કુરિવાજોની ભરમાર છે, છતાં એનો ઉલ્લેખમાત્ર નથી.

રાજુને આ ફિલ્મમાં પોતાની ગ્રહોના નંગની વીંટીઓને, પથારીવશ દર્દીએ વાપરવાના યુરિનટબમાં નાંખી દેતો બતાવ્યો છે. કોઈ મુસલમાન, એણે પહેરેલા તાવીજ-માદળીયા કે કાળા-લાલ દોરા-ધાગાને સંડાસના કમોડમાં નાંખી દે – શું એવું દૃશ્ય ફિલ્માવવાનું આમીરખાન પસંદ કરશે ? ગુજરાતનો નાગરસમાજ સભ્યતાની દૃષ્ટિએ અતિ ઉચ્ચ તેમજ સાહિત્ય અને ગીત-સંગીત વગેરે કળાના ક્ષેત્રમાં ખુબ આગળ વધેલો છે. એને આ ફિલ્મમાં કેવો બતાવ્યો છે? નાગર પરિવારનો દીકરો – રણછોડદાસ શામળદાસ ચાંચડ ભણવામાં નબળો છે અને ઘરનો નોકર છોકરો હોંશિયાર છે. આથી ‘રેંચો’ નામધારી એ છોકરાએ મહેનત કરવાની અને જે ઉચ્ચ ડીગ્રી મળે એ નાગર દીકરાને આપી દેવાની! ખ્યાલ આવે છે ને, આમીરની માનસિકતાનો! અને હા, હિન્દુ છોકરીને લગ્નમંડપમાંથી જ ઉપાડવાની અને એ રીતે સેંકડો હિન્દુ પરિવારોને એક સાથે બદનામ તેમજ દુ:ખી કરવાની પરંપરા શાહરુખખાને ‘દિલવાલે’થી શરુ કરી છે એ પરંપરાને આ ફિલ્મમાં આમીરે આગળ વધારી છે. છેલ્લે આમીર પોતાને ‘વેંગડૂ’ બતાવે છે – આ ‘વેંગડૂ’ એટલે શું? શું એ હિન્દુ છે? કે પછી એ ખ્રિસ્તી છે? ‘એ જીનિયસ વૈજ્ઞાનિક પોતાના સમાજનો છે’ એવો યશ કોઈ હિન્દુ લઈ ના શકે એવું આમીરે બરાબર ગોઠવ્યું છે.

હિન્દી ફિલ્મજગતમાં મુસ્લિમવાદ

પશ્ચિમબંગાળની જાજરમાન હિન્દુ અભિનેત્રી શર્મિલા ટાગોર અને મંસૂર અલિખાન પટૌડીનું ફરજંદ એવા સૈફ અલી ખાને પંજાબી હિન્દુ યુવતી અમૃતાસિંઘને પોતાના બાળકોની માતા બનાવીને છોડી દીધી અને શાહીદકપૂર તેમજ કરીના કપૂર – એ હિન્દુ કપલને તોડીને સૈફે કરીનાને પોતાની કરી લીધી. આમ કરતી વખતે એણે અમૃતાસિંઘના અરમાનોની સાથે-સાથે પોતાની માતાની લાગણીઓનો પણ વિચાર ના કર્યો. હિન્દુ માતા શર્મીલા, સૈફ અમૃતાને છોડે એની બિલકુલ વિરુદ્ધ હતી. છેવટે શાહીદ હાથ ઘસતો રહી ગયો. એ નબળો પ્રેમી સાબિત થયો. આની સામે સલમાનને જુઓ. એને ઓલરેડી છોડી ચુકેલી ઐશ્વર્યાને વિવેક ઓબેરોયે હુંફ આપી તો સલમાને વિવેકની કારકીર્દિ ખલાસ કરી નાંખી. ભગવાન પ્રત્યે ઉત્કટ પ્રેમ ઉભો થતા સમય લાગે એ સમજી શકાય પરંતુ પોતાની ગર્લફ્રેંડને પ્રેમ કરતા હોય તો એને સાચવવાની તાકાત તો હિન્દુ છોકરાઓએ બતાવવી જોઈએ ને ! એમાં શાહીદગીરી ના ચાલે ! આમીરે પણ પોતાની પહેલી પત્નીને છોડીને હિન્દુ યુવતી કાજલ સાથે બીજી વાર લગ્ન કર્યા. રણબીરકપૂર સાથે ગાઢ પ્રણયમાં મસ્ત એવી દિપીકા પાદૂકોણ તેમજ એને પસંદ કરતી અનિલકપૂરની દીકરી સોનમ, રણબીર સાથેના સંબંધો બગાડીને બન્ને આમીરના ભત્રીજા ઈમરાનખાન સાથે જોડાઈ ગઈ. આ રીતે ભારતના હિન્દી ફિલ્મના મુસ્લિમ હીરો ભારત સહિત દુનિયાના તમામ દેશોને એવો સંદેશ આપવા માંગે છે, કે દુનિયાભરની છોકરીઓ માત્ર મુસલમાન છોકરાઓને ભોગવવા માટે જ છે. તેઓ દૃઢપણે માને છે, કે ધર્માંતરણ દ્વારા મુસ્લિમોની સંખ્યા વધારવા માટે, જેમ ખેતરની જમીનમાં હળ ઘુસાડીને અનાજ પેદા કરાય છે તેમ ગેરમુસ્લિમ સ્ત્રીઓ સાથે શરીરસંબંધ કરીને મુસ્લિમ ઓલાદો પેદા કરવાની છે. વાનરવેડા કરતા સલમાને થોડા સમય પહેલા એક નિવેદન કર્યું હતું, કે ‘પોતે એવો આખલો છે કે જેનાથી ભારતની ગાય જેવી છોકરીઓએ પોતાની જાતને સંભાળવાની છે.’

હિમેશ રેશમીયાએ પોતાની ફિલ્મના દરેક ગીતમાં ‘યા અલ્લા’, ‘માશાલ્લા’, ‘શુભાનલ્લા’ વગેરે શબ્દો મુકવાનો તેમજ ગીત ગાતી વખતે હીરો-હીરોઈન પાસે વારંવાર ‘આદાબ’ની મુદ્રા કરાવવાનો નનૈયો ભણી દીધો તો સલમાને હીમેશને ક્યાં ગાયબ કરી દીધો એ કોઈ જાણતું નથી. એની સામે પાગલના રોલમાં સલમાનની, પાગલખાનામાં ફિલ્માવેલી એક આખી ફિલ્મમાં એક પાગલ ‘ઓમ શાંતિ: શાંતિ: શાંતિ’ એવો વેદના મહામંત્રનો જાપ કરતો હોય છે. એ પાગલને ધમકાવીને પાગલખાનાનો સિક્યુરીટી ગાર્ડ એ મંત્ર વિશે અતિ અભદ્ર કોમેંટ કરે છે એ ચાલે પરંતુ પોતાની ફિલ્મમાં પાકીસ્તાન વિરુદ્ધ બોલતા તેમજ ભારતની ગદ્દારી કરતા મુસલમાનોની બેઈજ્જતી બતાવતા પંજાબી જાટ હિન્દુ યુવાનો – સન્ની તેમજ બોબી દેઓલ પ્રત્યે વેરભાવના રાખી એમને એકલા પાડી દેવામાં આવે છે. તેઓની સાથે-સાથે અજય દેવગનની પણ સ્થિતિ એવી થઈ કે, પોતાની હોમ પ્રોડક્શનની ફિલ્મોનું નિર્માણ કરે તો જ તે કામ કરી શકે. મિસવર્લ્ડ ઐશ્વર્યાને મહિનાઓથી રોજ અડધી રાતે તેના ઘરે જઈને હેરાન કરી રહેલા સલમાન વિરુદ્ધ, અંડરવર્લ્ડથી ડરીને કોઈ પોલીસ ફરિયાદ કરી શકતું ન હતું – એ વાત સૌ જાણે છે. એ જ રીતે પરવાના વિનાની રાયફલ રાખવા બાબત સંજયદત્તની તપાસમાં જે ફોનકૉલ્સ ખુલ્યા એમાં બહાર આવ્યું, કે સંજયે હીરો ગોવિંદાનો કાંટો કાઢી નાંખવાની વાત ભાઈલોગને કરી હતી.

હમણાં અચાનક પાંચ મિનિટ માટે મારી નજર સામે ‘ફના’ ફિલ્મના દૃશ્યો આવ્યા ને હું ચમકી ગયો. મને થયું, કે ફિલ્મમાં આવું બતાવ્યું હોય તો ગુજરાતના માત્ર સરદાર પટેલ ગ્રુપે એકલાએ જ શા માટે એનો વિરોધ કર્યો? આ ફિલ્મ બનાવવા બદલ સમગ્ર ભારતમાંથી વિરોધ પ્રગટ થવો જોઈએ અને આમીરને દેશદ્રોહીનો મેડલ આપીને પેલા વિકૃત વાસનાવાળા ચિતારા હુસેનની જેમ આ દેશમાંથી હાંકી કાઢવો જોઈએ. ભારતીય નાગરિક તરીકે સૈન્યમાં દાખલ થઈને આમીર ભારતના હવાઈદળના જવાનોને મારી નાંખે છે અને પોતે પાકીસ્તાનને વફાદાર છે એવું ફિલ્મમાં બતાવે છે. ભલે એ ફિલ્મ હોય પરંતુ ભારતના એક નંબરના દુશ્મન દેશ એવા પાકીસ્તાનના વફાદાર તરીકે ભારતીય સેના તેમજ સૈનિકો સાથે ગદ્દારી કરવાની માનસિકતા ધરાવતી ફિલ્મ તૈયાર કરનાર માટે કહેવું શું?

યાદ કરો અમિતાભ બચ્ચનને! પોતાના દીકરા અભિષેકના લગ્ન મુંબઈમાં જ કર્યા છતાં ફિલ્મક્ષેત્રના એક પણ મુસલમાનને આમંત્રણ આપ્યું નહિ, ખાનબ્રધર્સને પણ નહિ. છતાં અત્યંત પ્રભાવી રીતે તેઓ ફિલ્મઉદ્યોગમાં ટકી રહ્યા છે. ટી-સીરિઝવાળા ગુલશનકુમારે જબરદસ્ત ક્રાંતિ કરી હતી. એણે પોતાનો નફો ખુબ ઘટાડી નાંખીને લાખોની સંખ્યામાં અઢળક ભજનોની કેસેટ્સ તેમજ સીડીનું નિર્માણ તેમજ વેચાણ કર્યું. પોતે તો કરોડો કમાયો પરંતુ એની સાથે-સાથે હિન્દુ ધર્મની એવી હવા ફેલાવી દીધી કે ચારે બાજુથી ગુલશનકુમારની વાહ-વાહ થવા લાગી. આથી કહેવાતા ઈસ્લામના ઠેકેદારો એવા અંડરવર્લ્ડના ભાઈલોગે ગુલશન પાસેથી એટલી મોટી રકમની ખંડણી માંગી કે કોઈ પણ ઉદ્યોગપતિ એ ખંડણી ચુકવવા તૈયાર ના થાય. અને હત્યારાઓએ ગુલશનને મુંબઈમાં ધોળે દિવસે રસ્તા પર દોડાવી-દોડાવીને માર્યો. રસ્તા પરથી એ મકાનોની ગલીમાં ઘુસ્યો ત્યાં પણ કોઈએ એને રક્ષણ ના આપ્યું. છેવટે કોઈ ખ્રિસ્તી બાઈના મકાનના, બાજુમાં બહારના ભાગે આવેલા જાજરુમાં જઈને એ ભરાયો. ત્યાં એ બાઈએ ટપોરીઓને ઈશારાથી ગુલશનના છુપાવાની જાણ કરી દીધી. શૂટરોએ શરીરમાં ગોળીઓ ધરબી દઈને ગુલશનને પતાવી દીધો. કોઈ પત્રકાર ગુલશનના મૃત્યુની વિગતો લેવા ગયો તો એ બાઈ ખડખડાટ હસતા-હસતા એની સાથે વાત કરતી હતી, કે છેલ્લી ઘડીએ મોતથી ગુલશન કેવો ડરી રહ્યો હતો? એ બાઈનું હસવાનું રોકાતું ન હતું.

ઘણીવાર મને પ્રશ્ન થતો કે બ્રાહ્મણોની ચોટલી, પૂજારીનું ધોતીયુ વગેરે હિન્દુ ધર્મના ચિહ્નો હાસ્યાસ્પદ શા માટે થયા? પછી ખબર પડી કે એ તો હિન્દી ફિલ્મની સમાજ પર થયેલી અસર છે. એની સામે ફિલ્મ જગતમાં ટાલીયાઓ ઘણા હોવાથી તેઓએ નક્કી કર્યું, કે ટાલીયાઓની મશ્કરી ન થાય અને ટાલ સ્ટેટસનું ચિહ્ન ગણાય એ માટે ફિલ્મમાં સારો રોલ કરનારને માથે ટાલ દેખાડવી. અને તેઓ એ બાબતમાં સફળ થઈ ગયા. વળી તમને એક પણ ફિલ્મમાં મુલ્લા-મૌલવી કે ફકીરની બેઈજ્જતી થતી જોવા નહિ મળે. ‘મુન્નાભાઈ’માં જ્યોતિષી બટુકમહારાજની કેવી ખરાબ હાલત કરવામાં આવી છે, યાદ છે ને! કોઈ પણ વિલન કે હીરો લગ્નમંડપમાં ગોરમહારાજનું કેવું અપમાન કરે છે? નિકાહ પઢાવતા કાઝીને તમે એવી હાલતમાં જોયો છે કોઈ દિ? જુની ઘણી હિન્દી ફિલ્મોમાં મંદિરના ભગવાનની સામે હીરોને ઉદ્ધત ભાષામાં ડાયલોગ મારતો બતાવ્યો છે. પૂછો, એ ફિલ્મના નિર્દેશકોને, કે મસ્જીદમાં જઈને ખુદાને પડકારવાની ગુસ્તાખી કરતા હીરોને દર્શાવતું દૃશ્ય તેઓ પોતાની ફિલ્મમાં ફિલ્માવવાનું પસંદ કરે છે?

એક ફિલ્મના નિર્માણમાં કરોડો-અબજો રુપિયા ખર્ચાતા હોવાથી અને અંડરવર્લ્ડના મુસ્લિમ ગુનેગારો એમાં રોકાણ કરતા હોવાથી સ્વાભાવિક રીતે જ તેઓ એવી ફિલ્મ બનાવડાવે કે એમાં હિન્દુઓની મશ્કરી થાય અને મુસ્લિમો સારા દેખાય. ઉપરાંત ફિલ્મો મુંબઈમાં બનતી હોવાથી અને મુંબઈમાં માફીયારાજ હોવાથી કોઈ નિર્માતા પોતાના જોખમે ફિલ્મ બનાવે તો પણ ભાઈલોગને તેઓની શરતે(મફતના ભાવે) ફિલ્મની પ્રિંટ્સ આપી જ દેવી પડે. આ રીતે મુંબઈના ફિલ્મક્ષેત્રના ઉદ્યોગપતિઓ આ પ્રકારની વિવિધ મુશ્કેલીઓ સામનો કરી રહ્યા છે. ફિલ્મઉદ્યોગને અંડરવર્લ્ડની તમામ બદીઓથી મુક્ત કરાવીને સ્વચ્છ ફિલ્મોનું નિર્માણ કરી શકાય એ માટે એ ક્ષેત્રના શ્રેષ્ઠીઓને ગુજરાતમાં યોગ્ય વાતાવરણ જણાય છે. એ માટે જરુરી સગવડો ગુજરાતમાં ઉપલબ્ધ થઈ શકશે એવું તેઓને સ્પષ્ટ લાગે છે.



I don’t know how many of my articles Readers  have read.  If you read enough you’d know that the reason I think Islam must go is because it is a doctrine that does not allow peaceful coexistence.

Let us say there is a religion with the following teachings. Do Moslim  think they  can have any peaceful co-existence with the followers of that religion?

We will cast terror into the hearts of Muslims. Therefore strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them. 8:12
Let not the non-Muslims take for friends or helpers the Muslims. 3:28,
Rouse the non-Muslims to the fight against Muslims. 8:65,
Then fight and slay the Muslims wherever ye find them, 9:5,
Fight the Muslims, and God will punish them by your hands, cover them with shame. 9:14 ,
O ye the non-Muslims take not for protectors your fathers and your brothers if they love Islam.9:23,
O ye the non-Muslims! Truly the Muslims are unclean. 9:28,
O ye non-Muslims! fight the Muslims who gird you about, and let them find firmness in you. 9:123,
Therefore, when ye meet the Muslims, smite at their necks; At length. 47:4,

I hope you agree that such religion has no right to exist, that its followers must be re-educated or if they persist they should be separated from the rest of mankind to maintain peace.

This is the 21st century and these educated Muslims believe the Earth is flat because the Quran says so and the Quran cannot be wrong.

Can you have peaceful co-existence with the Malsians whose sacred book mirrors the Quran and incites hatred against the Muslims?  You did not answer this question? Would you say that Malsi religion is a peaceful religion?  

No! Violence is NOT“shared characteristic” of humankind. People become violent when exposed to violent teachings. Yes, violence does also have psychological components, such as greed, envy, anger, etc. all byproducts of low self-esteem. However, crowds have a psychology of their own and they can become violent through external influences.  We do not expect to see violent behavior among a crowd coming out of a church, a synagogue, a Hindu or a Buddhist temple, or a Zoroastrian or a Baha’i gathering. But if I see a crowd coming out of a mosque towards me, I will run as fast as I can. 

Non violent people can become violent when they believe in violent teachings. If religion had no effect in how we humans behave, then what is the point of having religion at all?

The very purpose of religion is to influence people and make them do things their way.  If their way is peaceful, the believers are likely to behave peacefully and if it is violent, the believers will act violently.

Let us hear now what proof you can present to make us believe that Muhammad was a genuine, .

Related articles

Muslim Appeaser Politicians Turning India into an Islamic State

Muslim appeaser politicians turning India into an Islamic State.


Muslim appeaser politicians turning India into an Islamic State, Part 2

By FFI Contributing Editor Dr Radhasyam Brahmachari

Muslim appeasement by the UPA government:

In the previous article, it has been mentioned how the present United Progressive Alliance (UPA) coalition government in Delhi, under the leadership of Indian National Congress (INC) party is appeasing the Muslims of India with unfair, undemocratic, non-secular and even illegal privileges and concessions to Muslims and thus turning India into a de facto Islamic State. In fact, Muslims in India, despite being the minority, enjoy elevated status and much more privileges, generally offered by a typical Islamic government in a so called Islamic state.

The reader may gauge the extent of Muslim appeasement by the UPA government from the statement of its PM Manmohan Singh. He has said that the Muslims are the first to claim the produce of India. What is the basis of such a stupid comment? Does the Muslim contribute maximum share of India’s GDP? How aggressively the Congress is wooing the Muslim community nationally is evident from the a recent comment by another leader Digvijay Singh, who, while referring to the killing of Osama bin Laden, reverentially said “Osamaji” and bemoaned why the terrorist leader was not given a proper burial.

To please the Muslims further, the said UPA government has drafted a bill called “Prevention of Communal and Targeted Violence (Access to Justice and Reparation) Bill, 2011” and is intending to place the same in the Parliament in the coming Monsoon Session. If the bill gets approval of the Parliament and becomes a law, the Muslims will be supreme lords of the country while majority Hindus will be dragged into slaves of the Muslims.

It is needless to say that the UPA government is going to do this with an eye on vote-bank politics. It has been mentioned in the previous article that the Muslims cast their votes, not according to his/her personal choice but, according to the dictates of their religious and community leaders. Therefore, all Muslim votes go for a single party. When the quantum of Muslim votes becomes significant, or a deciding factor for winning or losing election, political parties start wooing Muslims for their votes by offering them unfair, and even illegal, concessions. The frantic competition that ensues among the political parties to win election and stay in power makes the politicians blind and take any sinister attempt, even at the cost of national interest, to win the Muslim block votes.  The reader may recall that the UPA government came to power for the second time in 2009, with the help of the Muslim votes and the present Communal Violence Bill is reward for their support.

The drafting of the Communal Violence Bill:

The draft of the so called Prevention of Communal and Targeted Violence (Access to Justice and Repatriation) Bill, 2011, has been prepared by the National Advisory Council (NAC), headed by Sonia Gandhi, the president of INC. It has been agreed by the NAC at its meeting on July 14th, 2010, the NAC Working Group on the Communal Violence Bill, has set up an Advisory Group and a Drafting Committee to develop a draft bill on communal and sectarian violence. The  draft a bill should aim to provide effective prevention and control of communal and sectarian violence, and justice and comprehensive reparations to survivors and victims of communal and sectarian violence. This would be ensured on the basis of certain essential elements accepted by people’s groups, civil society groups and the NAC, including the key principle of accountability of public officials. While framing the draft, the relevant provisions, including rules, for relief, compensation, rehabilitation, resettlement, restitution, and reparations, keeping in mind the rights of internally displaced persons.

The following are the members of the Advisory Group Members Communal & Sectarian Violence Bill, 2010 Advisory
 (1) Abusaleh Shariff, (2) Asgar Ali Engineer, (3) Gagan Sethi, (4) H.S Phoolka, (5) John Dayal, (6) Justice Hosbet Suresh, (7) Kamal Faruqui, (8) Manzoor Alam, (9) Maulana Niaz Farooqui, (10) Ram Puniyani, (11) Rooprekha Verma, (12) Samar Singh, (13) Saumya Uma, (14) Shabnam Hashmi, (15) Sister Mary Scaria, (16) Sukhdeo Thorat, (17) Syed Shahabuddin, (18) Uma Chakravarty, (19) Upendra Baxi, (20) Aruna Roy, NAC Working Group Member, (21) Professor Jadhav, NAC Working Group Member and (22) Anu Aga, NAC Working Group Member
 The Joint Conveners of the Advisory Group are (1) Farah Naqvi, Convener, NAC Working Group and (2) Harsh Mander, Member, NAC Working Group

The members of the Drafting Committee are (1) Gopal Subramanium, (2) Maja Daruwala, (3) Najmi Waziri, (4) P.I. Jose, (5) Prasad Sirivella, (6) Teesta Setalvad, (7) Usha Ramanathan (upto 20 Feb 2011) and (8) Vrinda Grover (upto 20 Feb 2011).

The conveners of Drafting Committee are (1) Farah Naqvi, Convener, NAC Working Group and (2) Harsh Mander, Member, NAC Working Group

The key Guiding Principles laid down before the drafting committee are
(1) Broaden title and applicability of the law to include ‘communal & sectarian violence’,
(2) Shift from empowering the State, to seeking action & accountability of State/public officials,
(3) Basic framework of law must not rest on declaration of “disturbed areas”,
(4) Need for an independent National Authority to ensure effective compliance with the law, without disturbing the federal structure,
(5) Ensure accountability & criminal liability of public officials for acts of omission & commission, for preventing or controlling communal & sectarian violence, or extending timely and adequate rescue, relief and rehabilitation,
(6) Incorporate the doctrines of Command & Superior responsibility,
(7) Definition of communal & sectarian violence to cover both isolated incidents as well as mass crimes, against people based on religious, caste, linguistic, regional and other identities,
(8) Need to specifically define and include new crimes/offences including sexual assault, enforced disappearances, torture, long-lasting social & economic boycott, and genocide, among others,
 (9) Need to remove prior sanction requirement for Hate Speech (Sec. 153A & 153B – IPC),
(10) Statutory obligation on government to lay down national standards for the entire spectrum of provisions for victims – including rescue, relief, compensation, rehabilitation, resettlement, restitution, reparation and recognizing the rights of internally displaced persons,
(11) Implementation according to the norms in point 10 to be a statutory obligation under this law,
(12) Compensation amounts to be specified in terms of national norms under the law, and revised every 3 yrs and
 (13) Need for amendments in CrPC and Indian Evidence Act to meet extraordinary circumstance of communal & sectarian violence to protect victims’ rights. In addition to that,
(14) specific provisions for victim-witness rights to be made under this law

The list of people as given above for guiding, monitoring and preparing the draft of the Communal Violence Bill 2011, one finds that all of them are loyal to the Nehru-Gandhi family. Many of them operate several NGOs and it is well known that an NGO is very efficient instrument to siphon public money. In addition to that, these committees were formed without any approval of the Parliament. So, while commenting on the formation of the committee, Sam Rajappa, in his article  Communal Violence Bill  says, “The very fact that Parliament was bypassed and the undemocratic National Advisory Council, acting as a supra Parliament, was entrusted the task of drafting the most sensitive legislation, makes the UPA government a suspect. Harsh Mander and Farah Naqvi, conveners of the advisory group to prepare the draft Bill, are known for bashing Narendra Modi, Chief Minister of Gujarat, and do not enjoy the confidence of the public” (The Statesman, June 4, 2011)..

“The NAC is a conglomeration of NGO members handpicked by Sonia Gandhi for their faith in the Nehru-Gandhi dynasty. Most of these NGOs are foreign-funded and they act according to the wishes of donors.  It is indirect interference in the affairs of the nation by foreign countries. The NAC chairperson has become a supra Prime Minister and an instrument for maladministration”, Rajappa adds.

Salient points of the draft:

The most crucial part of the draft for the Communal Violence Bill 2011 is the definition of the term ‘group’. The basis of such groupings may be religion, mother tongue, ethnicity and caste, e.g. schedule castes and schedule tribes. The next important step is to decide whether a group consists of the people of minority or the majority community. In India as a whole, Hindus are a majority and Muslims and Christian are a minority, on the basis of religion. Based on this criterion, the draft proceeds to designate any group consisting of Hindus as a group of majority, while a group consisting of Muslims and Christians as a group of minority community. But such identification is utterly faulty.
 There are so many states, e.g. Jammu and Kashmir, Punjab, Mizoram, Manipur, Meghalaya and Nagaland, and in the Andaman and Nicobar islands, where Hindus are minorities. So, in those states Hindus are deserved to be considered a religious minority. The most astonishing as well as ridiculous part of the draft Bill is that, communal troubles are created only by members of the majority community or the Hindus. From this basic presumption it comes out that for any incident of communal violence, only Hindus will be held responsible and punished. So, for any incident of communal violence between Hindus and Muslims in Jammu and Kashmir, where Muslims constitute more than 80% of the population, they will be considered a minority group and only Hindus will be held responsible and punished. Or in other words, if the Muslims in Jammu and Kashmir persecute the Hindus and massacre them en masse, even then the Hindus will be considered offenders and punished, while Muslims will not be held responsible.

Similar is the case for the states Mizoram, Manipur, Meghalaya and Nagaland, where Christians are majority and the Hindus are minorities. In the above mentioned states the Christian missionaries are carrying on ceasasionist movements. They have formed militant terrorist gangs and oppressing the Hindus. If the draft becomes a law, only the Hindus would be held guilty of such a violence and let the perpetrators go scot free, as they have labeled as a minority group. So, the draft Bill proceeds on the presumption that communal violence is created only by the majority community (Hindus) and never by members of the minority communities.

But history tells us that, so far violence between the Hindus and the Muslims is concerned, in almost all the cases, the Muslims are the initiators of the violence. The Mopla Riot in Malabar, Kerala, is one of the most famous incident of Hindu Muslim violence, was initiated by the Muslims (called Moplahs) on August 20, 1921. Instead of calling it a Hindu-Muslim riot, it would be proper to designate it as Hindu pogrom by the Moplahs. Another famous incident of communal violence is the “Great Calcutta Killings” that took place in August, 1946. It is also called the “Direct Action Day” by the historians. August 16 was Friday and that too in the month of Ramadan according to the Arabic calendar. It was therefore the holy day of the holiest month for the Muslims. On that holy day, lakhs of Muslims gathered under the Ochterlony Monument (now Shahid Minar) to offer midday holy Jumma prayer. After finishing the prayer, Muslims started to attack Hindus, killing Hindus, looting Hindu shops, setting Hindu shops and Hindu houses on fire. The killing of Hindus went on for several days.

Vultures feed on corpses of Hindu victims in Calcutta, August, 1946

Many hold this misconception that the 2002 Gujarat violence was initiated by the Hindus. But in reality, the violence was initiated by the Muslims by setting the coach S-6 of the Sabarmati Express on fire on February 27 at Godhra and burning 59 Hindu devotees, including women and children, alive. This barbaric incident initiated the communal violence in Gujarat that claimed over 1,200 lives. So, many called this Gujarat Violence as post Godhra Violence.

The coach S-6 of Sabarmati Express burning at Godhra

So, it can be shown that in every incident of Hindu-Muslim violence, Muslims are responsible. It is due to the fact that the Islamic holy book Koran spews hatred against the non-Muslims, including the Hindus and the Islamic doctrine of jihad inspire the Muslims to kill them, set their houses on fire, loot their wealth and riches, rape their women, occupy their tilling land, convert them by force and so on and so forth. But the holy books of the Hindus do not teach such hatred and oppress the non-Hindus. So, the presumption of the Communal Violence Bill 2011 that majority Hindus should be held responsible and punished for any incident Hindu-Muslim communal violence is patently discriminatory, undemocratic and non-secular. Such a view is totally opposed to the secular principle laid down in the Constitution of India that holds ‘an offence is an offence and the offender should be punished, irrespective of to what group he belongs’.
The other devastating provision:
The other devastating provision of the draft is that, if an individual of the minority community brings an allegation of propagation of hate against an individual belonging to the majority, police will have the right to arrest him without any investigation and put him behind the bar. The victim would not even have the right to know from whom the complaint has come. During trial, the complainant would not have any responsibility to establish his allegation, and it would be the sole responsibility of the victim to prove his innocence.

It is needless to say that this provision, if it becomes a law, would equip the UPA government to victimize any of its political rivals, and send him to prison. Suppose a fictitious man brings an allegation of propagating hate speech against Narendra Modi, the chief minister of Gujarat, the police will have the right to arrest him immediately and put him in prison. He will be released if and only if he succeeds to prove himself innocent.  So, Arindam Chaudhuri, an author, has said that the bill is to kill secularism in India (The Pioneer, June 4, 2011). He has also said, “The NAC-drafted Communal Violence Bill is a recipe for unmitigated disaster. In the guise of promoting communal harmony it promotes rank communalism. In the guise of protecting minorities, it attacks Hindu rights. This Bill will strike at the very foundation of liberty and legitimise criminal misdeeds of Muslims. It must not become law.”


From the discussion presented above, it appears that the draft of the Communal Violence Bill 2011 has been framed with a strong motive of Hindu bashing. The contents of the draft grossly violate the sacrosanct principle of secularism, democracy and equality enshrined in the Constitution of India and if it becomes a law, it would be a disaster for the Hindus. Though it is doubtful whether such a draconian bill could survive even a preliminary scrutiny of the Supreme Court of India, the Hindus should raise their voice across the country so that the bill gets defeated in the Parliament. If this bill is passed by the Parliament and becomes a law, it will undoubtedly push India a step towards Islamization.

Jihad in India

Jihad has come to India.  The Obama administration and the State Department will tell you that it is nothing more than isolated acts by individuals. 
The government in New Delhi will say you are stirring up anti-Muslim sentiment.  The mainstream media will ask how you can say that when we are hearing nothing about it from them. 
But it is real, and it is happening now.  I have seen it first-hand.  The Obama administration’s studied denial will find us caught as flat-footed in India as we were in Lebanon, Egypt, Libya, and elsewhere. 
The difference is that India is an economic and military giant, with nuclear weapons, and could be a cornerstone of any effective fight against radical Islam.
For several years, I have been talking about the progressive radicalization of Bangladesh
Although it is the only country that ranks among the ten most populous and the ten most densely populated, as well as being the second largest Muslim-majority nation, events there do not capture people’s imagination. 
Now Hasina wants Bangladesh as Islamic state.  This is why we liberated with our soldgers blood so we can have enemy as our neighbour.
When you talk about India in the same context, however, people take notice.  The thought of an Islamist dominated India scares the heck out of them and should. 
 While our own strategic thinkers concentrate on internecine struggles in the Middle East, their obliviousness to the significance of an Islamist India has enabled our enemies to further their agenda.
I have spent several years along India’s 2545 mile-long frontier with Bangladesh, and have seen the impact Bangladesh’s radicalization has had on its giant neighbor to the west.  Amitabh Tripathi, who has been fighting against what he calls his country’s “soft policies,” noted that Bangladesh’s Muslims “are not radicalized but their institutions are.”  That radicalization and a level of corruption on both sides of the border that makes my fellow Chicagoans look like amateurs has already produced demographic change in many strategic areas of India. 
 It also has given Muslim activists carte blanche throughout the entire country.  The process is deliberate, has been going on for decades, and should send us a screaming warning signal, not only because of what it bodes for India, but also because of what sort of future the Obama administration’s soft policies and tolerance for an open border to our south mean for the United States.
Each year in districts like Uttar Dinajpur and North and South 24 Parganas directly across from the Islamic state, my colleagues and I find that more and more villages which once had mixed Hindu-Muslim populations are now all Muslim or Muslim-dominated. 
Gone are the roadside temples characteristic of places where Hindus practice their faith openly; gone are the sights of Hindu women dressed in their colorful saris and other vestments. 
 They have been replaced by mosques and burqas. Last year, Tripathi and I met with Bimal Praminik, Director of the Kolkata-based Centre for Research in Indo-Bangladesh Relations and arguably the foremost authority on these population changes. 
 He is convinced that this population shift is a deliberate and an integral element the jihad that threatens all of us:  “Bangladeshi infiltration with Pakistani ideas… trying to ‘Pakistanize’ the entire region,” he said adding that that the dominant culture for South Asian Muslims has become more “Arabic,” than South Asian.
In 1947 when the British left, they partitioned the Indian subcontinent into Hindu and Muslim states.  West Bengal went to Hindu India, and East Bengal (now Bangladesh) became part of Pakistan. 
While Hindu and Muslim majorities respectively, remain, exhaustive studies by Pramanik and others hold out little hope that things will continue that way. 
During the second half of the 20th century, the Muslim proportion of West Bengal’s population rose by 25 percent and its Hindu population declined by nine, a process that has continued into the 21st
At the same time, Bangladesh’s Hindu population dropped from almost a third to nine percent.  The process has not been pretty and has involved murder, gang rape, abduction of women and children, forced conversion to Islam, and legalized thievery of ancestral Hindu lands under Bangladesh’s anti-Hindu Vested Property Act. 
And now it is happening in India.
Between 1981 and 1991, Muslim population growth in West Bengal actually exceeded its growth in Bangladesh.  The South Asia Research Society concluded that Hindus have been fleeing Islamist persecution in East Bengal since the partition; but that since Bangladesh’s emergence as an independent nation in 1971, “there has been large scale voluntary infiltration of Bangladeshi Muslims…to West Bengal and other parts of India” as well. 
The actual Muslim population growth exceeded Indian government projections that were based on demographic factors (fertility and mortality), internal migration, and the influx of Hindu refugees; thus, there had to be another element driving the change. 
Pramanik identifies it as “illegal immigration from across the border.”  Islamist plans have been so detailed and longstanding that since 1951 the Muslim growth rate exceeded that of Hindus in each individual district of West Bengal.
Statistics might be the “smoking gun,” but jihad’s impact is far more powerful in the testimony of individual non-Muslim residents who are its victims.  One elderly woman in the Howrah district told us how Muslims are taking over her property piece by piece. 
She even showed us a wall with a star and crescent on it that local Muslims built to identify it as dar al Islam.  In another village, residents showed us the remains of a Hindu temple that Muslims recently destroyed after urinating on its holy objects. 
 Most poignant was the testimony of a crestfallen mother whose 22-year-old daughter was abducted weeks ago by local Muslims. 
Abduction of Hindu women and girls in the name of Islam has been common in Bangladesh for years and is a key element in jihad: eliminating females of childbearing years from the gene pool and forcing them to “produce” Muslim offspring instead.  It is now happening in India, according to victimized parents who told me about it in India’s North and Northeast.
Residents of Deganga, only 40 kilometers from the West Bengal capital of Kolkata, lived through an anti-Hindu pogrom last September.  The pogrom started — as these things are wont to do these days — with a fabricated land dispute in which Muslims claimed a wooded area off the region’s main road that Hindus own and on which sits a Hindu shrine that is considered very sacred. 
As the 2010 Islamic observance of Iftar came to an end, a large group of Muslims attempted to seize the land until local Hindus stopped them.  It was then that they started attacking Hindu households and shops indiscriminately, forcing many to flee the area with little more than the clothes on their backs.
I returned to Deganga last month to find that while many homes and shops have been rebuilt, a sense of security by Hindus in their ancestral land has not.  Most of the residents spoke about leaving the area; others talked about being fearful of attack, their children unable to attend school, and Hindu women being harassed whenever they go to the market or other places in the area. 
 Many of them showed us charred pieces of their former residences; in other cases we were able to see signs of it bleeding through a new coat of paint.  Hindu women and girls showed us where they hid during the attack to avoid being raped or abducted and made concubines; a fate that likely has befallen the missing 22-year old daughter of the mother above.
In every single one of these cases, local authorities have refused to take action.  In fact, during the Deganga pogrom, they arrested the community’s wealthiest Hindu on the false charge of firing on the jihadis.
In the past, this official inaction has been purchased; but it is also a product of the alliance between Islamists and Communists in India.  That alliance was announced publicly at a meeting in the south Indian state of Kerala; and it has been policy for West Bengal’s three-decade old communist government. 
 Wherever we spoke with these villagers, Muslim neighbors would gather menacingly in an attempt to intimidate our informants.  In some cases, they attacked after we left — again with no action by the authorities.
In Meerut northeast of New Delhi and far from Deganga, the population of this once Hindu-dominated town is now split down the middle between Hindus and Muslims; and the Hindus are living in fear. 
Just five days ago before my arrival, a Hindu was burned to death and shortly before that a community leader was targeted and killed.  These actions are becoming more common in this substantial-sized town with no police re-action; and according to residents and activists, it is only a matter of time before things explode.
Our State Department will tell you that there is no jihad in India.  They will hew the official line that the liberal Awami League government in Bangladesh has put an end to anti-Hindu actions there. 
A similarly weak government in New Delhi will parrot the same platitudes.   Yet, their false palliatives bring no comfort to the scores of victims who have told us their stories; or the many others now unable to do so.
They cannot explain away major terrorist attacks in India’s largest cities like Mumbai, Pune, in New Delhi, and elsewhere.  They cannot explain how insurgents can regularly kidnap minor officials and receive their ransom (usually release of prisoners, cash, and government forbearance from counter terrorist action) every time they do.
  If the Obama administration and its left-wing counterparts in India do not replace their studied ignorance with effective action, we will be as “surprised” over what becomes of India as we were with Iran, Egypt, and a host of other nations.
Imagine what an Islamist India would mean for us.
%d bloggers like this: