Thoughts of Rabindranath Tagore on Hindu-Muslim Relations

Christianity and Islam determined to destroy all other Religions: There are two religions in earth, which have distinct enmity against all other religions. These two are Christianity and Islam. They are not just satisfied with observing their own religions, but are determined to destroy all other religions. That’s why the only way to make peace with them is to embrace their religions.” (Original works of Rabindranath Vol. 24 pages 375, Vishwa Bharti; 1982)

Muslims can not confine their `Patriotism to any one country’ : a very important factor which is making it almost impossible for Hindu-Muslim unity to become an accomplished fact is that the Muslims can not confine their patriotism to any one country. I had frankly asked (the Muslims) whether in the event of any Mohammedan power invading India, they (Muslims) would stand side by side with their Hindu neighbours to defend their common land. I was not satisfied with the reply I got from them… Even such a man as Mr. Mohammad Ali (one of the famous Ali brothers, the leaders of the Khilafat Movement-the compiler) has declared that under no circumstances is it permissible for any Mohammedan, whatever be his country, to stand against any Mohammedan.” (Interview of Rabindranath in `Times of India’, 18-4-1924 in the column, `Through Indian Eyes on the Post Khilafat Hindu Muslim Riots)

Hindus and Muslims can make a fake friendship: Whenever a Muslim called upon the Muslim society, he never faced any resistance- he called in the name of one God `Allah-ho-Akbar’. On the other hand, when we (Hindus) call will call, `come on, Hindus’, who will respond? We, the Hindus, are divided in numerous small communities, many barriers-provincialism – who will respond overcoming all these obstacles?

“We suffered from many dangers, but we could never be united. When Mohammed Ghouri brought the first blow from outside, the Hindus could not be united, even in the those days of imminent danger. When the Muslims started to demolish the temples one after another, and to break the idols of Gods and Goddesses, the Hindus fought and died in small units, but they could not be united. It has been provided that we were killed in different ages due to our discord.

“Weakness harbours sin. So, if the Muslims beat us and we, the Hindus, tolerate this without resistance-then, we will know that it is made possible only by our weakness. For the sake of ourselves and our neighbour Muslims also, we have to discard our weakness. We can appeal to our neighbour Muslims, `Please don’t be cruel to us. No religion can be based on genocide’ – but this kind of appeal is nothing, but the weeping of the weak person. When the low pressure is created in the air, storm comes spontaneously; nobody can stop it for sake for religion. Similarly, if weakness is cherished and be allowed to exist, torture comes automatically – nobody can stop it. Possibly, the Hindus and the Muslims can make a fake friendship to each other for a while, but that cannot last forever. As long as you don’t purify the soil, which grows only thorny shrubs you cannot expect any fruit. ” (The above is the part of the article “Swamy Shraddhananda’, written by Rabindranath in Magh, 1333 Bangabda; compiled in the book ‘Kalantar’)

Own religion true-others are false: “When two-three different religions claim that only their own religions are true and all other religions are false, their religions are only ways to Heaven, conflicts can not be avoided. Thus, fundamentalism tries to abolish all other religions. This is called Bolshevism in religion. Only the path shown by the Hinduism can relieve the world form this meanness.” (The above is the part of the article `Aatmaparichapa’ in his book `Parichaya’)

Make your children strong: The terrible situation of the country makes my mind restless and I cannot keep silent. Meaningless ritual keep the Hindus divided in hundred sects. Sop we are suffering from series of defeats. We are tired and worn-out by the fortunes by the internal external enemies. The Muslims are united in religion and rituals. The Bengali Muslims the South Indian Muslims and even the Muslims outside India-all are united. They always stand untied in face of danger. The broken and divided Hindus will not be able to combat them. Days are coming when the Hindus will be again humiliated by the Muslims.

“You are a mother of children, one day you will die, passing the future of Hindus society on the weak shoulders of your children, but think about their future.” (From the letter to Hemantabala Sarkar, written on 16the October, 1933, quoted in Bengali weekly `Swastika’, 21-6-1999)

ઇસ્લામમાં Aurat યોનિ થાય છે. અથવા pussy

I

In Pakistan, india and Bangldesh
Aurat means Vagina or Pussy.
SOME TIMES ; By. Santosh Bhatt

Islam નો મહિલાઓ જાતીય માણસોhu તરીકે જોવામાં આવે છે. તેમના શરીરના દરેક ભાગમાં શૃંગારિક માનવામાં આવે છે. તેના પ્રત્યેક ચોરસ ઇંચ, જાતીય છે. તેના સમગ્ર શરીર ખાનગી ભાગો હોવાનું માનવામાં આવે છે કારણ કે તે, હેડ માંથી ટો કવર જ જોઈએ.
પાકિસ્તાન, સ્ત્રીઓ awra કહેવામાં આવે છે. Awra અથવા aurat આવરી લેવામાં આવે છે કે શરીરના ભાગ છે. જો Awra ખુલ્લુ પાડવું ઇસ્લામમાં ગેરકાનૂની છે અને પાપ તરીકે ગણવામાં આવે છે. વ્યુત્પત્તિશાસ્ત્રની રીતે, શબ્દ Awra “defectiveness”, “અપૂર્ણતા”, “ડાઘ” અથવા “નબળાઇ” થાય છે જે રુટ ‘awr પરથી આવ્યો છે – જો કે સૌથી સામાન્ય ઇંગલિશ અનુવાદ “નગ્નતા” છે.

ઇરાન ઇસ્લામિક શાસન સ્ત્રીઓ zaifeh કહે છે. તે માટે સ્ત્રીની છે “નબળા.” ગુપ્ત માં ખામી છે મુહમ્મદ સ્ત્રીઓ અનુસાર ત્યારથી આ પણ માનસિક નબળાઇ સૂચિત. ઇસ્લામમાં સ્ત્રી પરિસ્થિતિ ઉપર આ રકમનું. તમે આ કરતાં વધુ સ્પષ્ટ હોઈ શકે નહિં.
સ્ત્રીઓ નબળા, ખામીયુક્ત અને ખાનગી ભાગ છે, તેઓ પુરુષો સાથે હોઇ શકે છે કે જે કોઈપણ સંપર્ક તરીકે જોવામાં આવે છે કે સમાજમાં જાતીય અને ગેરકાનૂની ગણવામાં આવે છે.

મુસ્લિમ દેશોમાં મહિલાઓ અલગ છે. ખૂબ જ બાળપણ છોકરાઓ અને છોકરીઓ સિવાય રાખવામાં આવે છે. તેઓ એકબીજા સાથે રમવા નથી, એકબીજા સાથે શાળાએ નથી.
એક મુસ્લિમ મહિલા સમગ્ર શરીર ખાનગી ભાગ છે. તમે તેની સાથે હાથ મિલાવવા હોય તો તેથી તે તેના ડાળી કે શાખાઓ વચ્ચેનો ખૂણો સ્પર્શ તરીકે જ છે. તે તેના વાળ દર્શાવે છે, તો તે તેના pubic વાળ જાહેર થયેલ છે. તેના બધું જાતીય અને ખાનગી ભાગ છે.

ઇસ્લામ સ્ત્રીઓ તેમના પુરૂષ સંબંધીઓ ના namoos (ناموس) છે. Namoos આશરે સન્માન, પરંતુ તેને એક લૈંગિક સૂચિતાર્થ સાથે ભાષાંતર કરી શકો છો. Prying આંખો માંથી તેમના માદા કિન રક્ષણ પર મુસ્લિમ ટકી આ namoos.

એક મહિલા તેની સુંદરતા અથવા અજાણી વ્યક્તિ માણસ માટે મંત્રણા દર્શાવે છે, તો બધા તેના પુરુષ સંબંધીઓ ના namoos ઘાયલ થયેલ છે. ઇજાગ્રસ્ત namoos રિડીમ કરવા માટે આ એકમાત્ર રસ્તો લોહી સાથે ડાઘ ધોવા માટે છે.

પિતૃપ્રધાન સમાજ સ્વ અવમૂલ્યન અર્થમાં સાથે પુરૂષો પેદા કરે છે. તેથી, જ્યારે મુસ્લિમ માણસ “સન્માન,” તેમણે કાબૂમાં રાખવું હેઠળ તેમના આશ્રિતો સ્ત્રી રાખી શકો છો કેવી રીતે લગભગ સંપૂર્ણપણે આધાર રાખે છે.

તેમણે અનુભવતું છે કે કરવું નિષ્ફળ કરીશું. કુલ દરેકને તેમને વિશે વાત અને તેની પીઠ પાછળ તેમને હસવું આવશે કે જાણે છે.

કુલ કરવામાં આવ્યું છે જે મહિલા હત્યા “defiled.” ઇસ્લામિક સોસાયટી, જેમ કે એક માણસ પર નીચે જોવા નથી, પરંતુ તેમણે ghairat (ગૌરવ, સન્માન, અર્થમાં) હોવા તરીકે lionized છે તેના દ્વારા namoos પુનઃસ્થાપિત કરી શકો છો.

પ્રશ્ન આ ગાંડપણ અટકાવવા માટે કેવી રીતે છે. હવે અમે આ સમસ્યા રુટ કારણ ખબર કે જવાબ સ્પષ્ટ છે. આ સમસ્યા ઇસ્લામિક misogyny છે.

અમે ગુપ્ત માં ખામી નબળી અને આવરાયેલ છે કે ખામીયુક્ત વસ્તુ તેની સ્ત્રીઓ વર્તે છે કે સમાજ પાસેથી વધુ અપેક્ષા રાખી શકો નહીં. સ્ત્રીઓ dehumanized છે અને sexualized સન્માન હત્યાનો પરિણામ છે. જ્યાં

ઇસ્લામમાં, એક છોકરી માટે પરિપક્વતા વર્ષની 9 વર્ષ છે અને એક બોય માટે 15 વર્ષ છે. આ એક 9 વર્ષના છોકરી અને 15 વર્ષના છોકરો પરિપક્વતા સમાન સ્તર ધરાવે છે માનવામાં આવે છે કે થાય છે.

હવે, જો છોકરી છ વર્ષ અગાઉ બોય કરતાં પરિપક્વતા પહોંચે, પછી શા માટે સ્ત્રીઓ ચાર્જ હતી ભગવાન સ્થળ પુરુષો? માતાનો ભગવાન જજમેન્ટ સાથે કંઇક ખોટું હતું?

સન્માન હત્યાનો ઇસ્લામિક દેશોમાં અસર માત્ર સમસ્યા નથી. સરમુખત્યારશાહી, હિંસા, આતંકવાદ, ગરીબી, માનવ અધિકારના દુરુપયોગની, અને મુસ્લિમ દેશોમાં સ્થાનિક છે કે અન્ય સમસ્યાઓ એક યજમાન બધા ઇસ્લામ ઉપદેશો કારણે થાય છે.

મુસ્લિમો ઓનર પોતાના પુત્રીઓ અથવા હત્યાનો ભયાનક કૃત્ય છે જે બહેનો ઓફ કિલીંગ નથી, અમુક એક તમારા પોતાના પરિવારના સભ્યો કિલીંગ માં ઓનર છે તે મને સમજાવો કૃપા કરીને?
કુરાન likens કુલ વિલ્સ તરીકે એક માણસ દ્વારા ઉપયોગમાં લેવા માટે એક ક્ષેત્ર (ખેડ) માટે એક મહિલા,: “તમારા સ્ત્રીઓ યે ચાલશે જેથી તમારા ખેડ પર જાઓ તમારા માટે ખેડ (કેળવવા માટે છે)” (2:223) .

કુરાન પણ એક મહિલા જુબાની કે એક માણસ વર્થ અડધા છે કે જાહેર: “તમારા પોતાના માણસો, બે સાક્ષીઓ મેળવો અને યે પસંદ જેમ કે પછી બે માણસો એક માણસ અને બે મહિલાઓ,, માટે ત્યાં ન હોય તો તેમને એક errs જો સાક્ષીઓ, અન્ય તેના “(2:282) યાદ કરી શકીએ.

તે પુરુષો ચાર પત્નીઓ સુધી લગ્ન કરવા માટે પરવાનગી આપે છે, અને એ પણ ગુલામ કન્યાઓ સાથે સંભોગ છે: યે યે અનાથ સાથે justly વ્યવહાર સમક્ષ રજુ કરવાનો પ્રયત્ન રહેશે ડર છે કે “જો, તમારી પસંદગી, બે અથવા ત્રણ અથવા ચાર મહિલા સાથે લગ્ન, પરંતુ જો યે યે (તેમને સાથે) justly વ્યવહાર માટે સમર્થ નથી રહેશે કે ભય, તો પછી માત્ર એક, અથવા (એક કેપ્ટિવ) તમારા જમણા હાથ ધરાવે છે, કે જે અન્યાય “(4:3) કરવાથી તમે રોકવા માટે વધુ યોગ્ય રહેશે.

જો તે પુત્ર માતાનો વારસો પુત્રી કે બે વખત માપ પ્રયત્ન કરીશું કે જે નિયમો: “અલ્લાહ (આમ) તમે તમારા બાળકો (વારસા) ગણાવે દિશામાન: પુરુષ માટે, બે સ્ત્રીઓ કે બરાબર એક ભાગ” (4:11) .

બધા વરવા છે, મુસલમાનોનો મુખ્ય ધર્મગ્રંથ તેમના અવગણના કરનારું પત્નીઓ હરાવ્યું પતિના કહે છે: “તેઓ (સ્ત્રીઓ આધાર માટે) તેમની મિલકત ખર્ચ કારણ કે અલ્લાહ એક્સેલ તેમને એક અન્ય સામગ્રી, અને આ બધુ મેળવી આપ્યું છે કારણ કે પુરૂષો, સ્ત્રીઓ ચાર્જ છે. તેથી સારા સ્ત્રીઓ અલ્લાહ સાવચેતીભર્યું આપ્યું છે કે જે ગુપ્ત માં રક્ષણ માટે, આજ્ઞાકારી હોય છે. યે બળવો ડર જેમને તે માટે, તેમને સમજાવવું અને અલગ પથારી તેમને દેશનિકાલ કરવું, અને શાપ તેમને “(4:34).

તે ઇસ્લામિક છૂટાછેડા કાર્યવાહી (65:4) “હજુ સુધી માસિક ધર્મમાં ન હોય તેવા લોકો માટે લાગુ પડશે કે” નક્કી, પૂર્વ તરુણ કન્યાઓ માટે લગ્ન માટે પરવાનગી આપે છે.

મુસ્લિમ શિક્ષણ અથવા સિદ્ધિઓ પર ગર્વ ન લો અને વિજ્ઞાન શ્રેષ્ઠતા હાંસલ કરવાની પરંતુ તેમના ગૌરવ બદલે બે કાન વચ્ચે તેમના પોતાના માદા સભ્યો બે પગ વચ્ચે છે .. વલણવાળું ..
ત્યાં આ બધા સમસ્યાઓ માટે એક સ્પષ્ટ ઉકેલ છે, પરંતુ તે કહે રાજકીય ખોટો છે. આ સમસ્યા Islam નો છે, અને ઉકેલ તે છુટકારો મેળવવા માટે છે. આ વિશ્વાસ વિશે સત્ય કહેવાની અને ખ્રિસ્તી અને અન્ય તમામ ધર્મો ટીકા કરવામાં આવી છે કે આ જ રીતે ટીકા જરૂરી છે.

જોકે, Moslims પૃથ્વી પર દરેક અન્ય વિશ્વાસ ટીકા, પરંતુ ઇસ્લામ અને મોહમ્મદ કાર્ય ટીકા કોઈ કોઈ મોટી છે તે માટે યોગ્ય છે. સ્ત્રી હોઈ બને જે સાથી નાગરિક સાથે જ બસ પર જુલમ નિષિદ્ધ છે.,

અને હાથ મિલાવવા અથવા આંખ સંપર્ક નથી. સ્ત્રીઓ સાથે કોઇ સંપર્ક જે માત્ર તેમને પાપ અને તેણે બળાત્કાર કરી શકે છે કારણ નહીં હોય, પણ તેના પુરુષ સંબંધીઓ ભંગ કરશે, લૈંગિક આ મેલું Moslim પુરૂષો પેદા કરી શકે છે.
કુરાન (4:34) પુરુષો સ્ત્રીઓ ચાર્જ છે કહે છે. આ જ શ્લોક “સારો સ્ત્રીઓ અલ્લાહ સાવચેતીભર્યું આપ્યું છે કે જે ગુપ્ત માં રક્ષણ માટે, આજ્ઞાકારી હોય છે.” કહે છે

આ ગુપ્ત તેમના awra છે. ઇસ્લામમાં મહિલા આખા શરીરને જાતીય ગણવામાં આવે છે, કારણ કે તેઓ તેમના શરીરના દરેક ભાગ આવરે છે અને અજાણી વ્યક્તિ પુરુષો સાથે સંપર્ક ટાળવા જ જોઈએ. શ્લોક 24:31 સ્ત્રીઓ માને છે, તેમના ત્રાટકશક્તિ ઓછી સામાન્ય હોઈ શકે છે અને તેઓ તેમના bosoms પર તેમના veils ડ્રો અને અજાણ્યાની માટે તેમની સુંદરતા દર્શાવવા જોઈએ નહિં જ જોઈએ છે.
પશ્ચિમમાં, એક મહિલા તેની સાથે ડાન્સ પણ ગાલ પર તેના ચુંબન અને લૈંગિક ગણવામાં આવે છે કે જે કંઈ સાથે હાથ મિલાવવા કરી શકો છો.
ઇસ્લામમાં Aurat યોનિ થાય છે.

Owaisi – the blue eyed monster of India

This article is produced here from a Blogger friend Agniveer as written.

Owaisi – the blue eyed monster of India
Jan 08, 2013 03:44 pm | Agniveer Agni
They say that the custom of worshipping Satan is as old as worship of God. Most religious scriptures state that the clout of Evil is never to be underestimated. In fact most mythologies or prophecies from all religions have the same pattern – There was (will be) a powerful Evil. Call it Satan, Rakshas, Antichrist, Goliath or Dajjal. He was (will be) very powerful and made (make) lives of people hell. Yet he would have a great fan following and no one would dare stand in front of him. Everyone would try to appease him so as to not face his wrath. Fear is the Key! This would continue for decades and centuries. Finally, the superhero – an avatar, or Holy Spirit, or Prophet, or Imam or a divinely inspired soul comes that destroys the Evil. Ironically, the entry of the superhero is always too late to be of any help for those innumerable ones who already got trampled by the Evil in the previous decades or centuries.

Same seems to be the case with India. We seem to be perennially waiting for the superhero for ages who would get us out of the shameless mess that surrounds us and destroys the contemporary Evil. I have heard that more than 100 generations of my forefathers were trampled in this wait and no superhero ever came. Meanwhile the Evil kept changing faces, kept spreading all around like stench coming from garbage pile in Dharavi and infecting all. It would keep creating new demons by turning each infected one into a new demon. And then it becomes difficult to pinpoint who the real Evil is.

And since no superhero is expected to come in near future, the politicians among us appease the Evil, the diplomats put a diplomatic silence on their lips and the rest of us turn a blind eye. What more can you expect from a society that could not even help a dying rape victim on road for an hour and now is shouting protest slogans to hide the hollowness eating us! Yes I am referring to the gang-rape case of Delhi that exposed everyone – the society, the police, the politicians, the media, the celebrities, the intellectuals, the aam-aadmi – and brought us face to face with our naked shamelessness.

But that is not the focus of this article. The focus is an equally shameless act by a criminal MLA conducted in open that was meekly accepted by the spineless intelligentsia of the nation as a natural reaction to so-called Hindu fundamentalism! I am referring to the one hour speech by a small-time Hyderabad MLA with criminal background who made the most insulting remarks on nation, its majority and its police ever by any politicians. On top of that, while his thousands of supporters waved the green flags, he openly challenged the establishment to dare to take action against him.

I recall that a progeny of a “royal” family of ruling party who is considered a black sheep for 2 generations, allegedly made a vague but seemingly violent statement without naming any person or community. He was promptly arrested and put in prison. He had then said that: “If a hand rises against Hindus, he will cut that hand.”

I was impressed by the sensitivity and alertness of my nation’s establishment and media, that took no chances in punishing him and sending a message that even vague indirect references to violence of any sort are not permitted in this secular sensitive nation.

And here is Akbaruddin Owaisi – the erstwhile alliance partner of the ruling party – who openly called police and security forces eunuch. And aggressively threatens, “If these eunuch be removed for 15 minutes, 25 crore Muslims would wipe off 100 crore Hindus.” He did not stop at that. He abused Hindu Gods and Goddesses and abused India. And then gave his blanket assurance to all his hooligans to protect them when they take law in their hands. The uneducated MLA who does not know difference between cow and antelope (Neel gai), appealed to all Muslims to kill cows defying law because that is sacred to Hindus.

And after that rousing speech in front of a crowd of thousands of fanatics, he went out to London in a royal fashion. Until a local citizen dared to file a case against him, the government, the police, the politicians, the media – no one found a reason to take this insult of nation and its majority by a sitting MLA as an issue of treason or inciting communal harmony. A few tweets did express some meek dissatisfaction and a few channels did cover the report as a regular duty. Almost all blamed “Hindu fundamentalists” for this!

I wonder why no one thought of blaming “Islamic fundamentalism” for Varun Gandhi’s speech in same league?

And when he returned back to India after his royal visit, he refused to surrender despite non-bailable charges. And no one could dare to force him into arrest. He growled, “I need 4 days to think over the arrest issue.” And the establishment said, “Your wish is our command!”

The only reason I can attribute to this all-permeating impotency is that perhaps Akbaruddin Owaisi is the new face of the demon. The new blue-eyed monster of this nation. In fact by displaying this shameless cowardice, the government, the media and everyone else are proving his claims to be true – “That all of them are Naamard (impotent) and even a crore impotent can do nothing worthwhile”

He said openly, “He would ensure that world fears him.” So the politicians appease and the diplomats remain tight-lipped. Who dare face the wrath of the Evil! When Evil came in form of the murderous Akbar 500 years ago, we worshipped him. How can we make an exception for the new-age Akbar! After all who knows to what extent the terror-links of a person, who dares abuse India in front of Indians, go to. Who knows what the sources of his lavish lifestyle are! Who knows why he was shot by a rival gang of Mohammad Pehalwan! Why take risk. Let us instead blame the fictitious “Hindu fundamentalists” who are neither in any Most Wanted List of any country, nor have any organized group like Al Qaeda or Lashkar-e-Taiyeba and hence pose zero risk. After all, the statements of a few aged sentimental “so-called Hindutva” leaders, who can offer nothing more than empty rhetorics to which no one listens, can be stretched out of context and linked with a random spurt of riots that happened more than 10 years ago in Gujarat to blame everything on the non-existent “Hindu fundamentalist”!

This habit of the spineless diplomats (media, politicians, intellectuals) is most stunning to me. To link everything to Hindu fundamentalism. I just don’t understand if they don’t feel any embarrassment making such lame arguments. The point is simple – if some so-called Hindu fundamentalist terrorises or kills or loots or incites people for violence, by all means, please arrest him. It was exactly on this logic that Varun Gandhi was arrested, Sadhvi Pragya was arrested. I do not know how solid the evidence were. But no media house or secular party tried to defend them citing their alleged deeds to be a reaction to “Islamic fundamentalism”.

But in case a Modi wins peaceful elections in Gujarat, blame it on “Hindu fundamentalism”. If Hindu passengers are burnt in a train, blame it on their “Hindu fundamentalism”. If Owaisi abuses Hindus and Hindustan, blame it on “Hindu fundamentalism”! I can explain this by nothing except what Owaisi said in his inflammatory speech: “Fear is the key”!

The Delhi rape incident made me ashamed to core for being an Indian. And this silent surrender to open terrorism and insult of country by a government representative takes my shame to an all new level. It brings even more shock when I heard that a rising leader of an emerging political party that made fight against corruption its main plank, telephoned a TV Channel to persuade it against showing a program against this speech of Owaisi. No leader of any secular party came forward to condemn it without linking to so-called Hindu fundamentalism. No one took to streets to demand arrest of this elected terrorist. No one threatened the withdraw support from government for shielding a hate-monger despite non-bailable arrest warrant. No one dared to say that death threat to majority of the country and insult of motherland are at least as serious issues as that of financial corruption. No spiritual guru questioned this abuse of Hindu Gods and Goddesses as well as Hindustan by a government representative.

And the greatest victims of misdeeds of these evils who sometimes come as Zakir Naik, sometimes as Osama and sometimes as Akbaruddin Owaisi are the common Muslims. By pretending to represent all Muslims, they bring bad name to all of them. Such speeches bring every Muslim under scanner. Radical Islam has tortured Muslims more than anyone else. And somehow the evil of radical Islam refuses to die. Rarely is any powerful voice heard and highlighted from Muslim community that condemns this terrorism. If a voice gets strong, it is silenced by the same cartel of terrorists. Many in the clergy give silent support to these terror-mongers. Thus a Zakir or an Owaisi are able to brainwash the upcoming youth among Muslims. They are told that all their sufferings are due to injustice meted out by Hindus. They are taught that Hindus killed them, looted them, discriminated against them, raped them and that is why Muslims are the least progressive society.

Very smartly, they would refuse to also highlight that 10000 times more Muslims are killed in Muslim nations or by Muslims than that ever in any unfortunate Hindu-Muslim riot. There are no Hindus in Pakistan, Iran, Iraq, Egypt, Algeria, Sudan, Somalia to dominate Muslims. But still mosques are bombed, innocents are killed, rape incidents are highest. The culprits are so-called Muslims themselves. Actually the very same gang of radical Muslims.

They would not tell these gullible youths that Arabs don’t even consider Muslims of sub-continent as better than slaves and discrimination is official. For them Muslim is only one who is an Arab. And hence sects like Sufis, Shias and Ahmadiyas are worse than Kafirs for them. And outside this Arab, Muslims of all sects (including Shias, Ahmadiyas and Sufis) are safest and most respectfully treated in India compared to any other Muslim nation of the world. In Pakistan, all who apply for passport have to declare that they hate Ahmadiya muslims.

Hindus in general are a peaceful tolerant community and this blend with Hindus has given a unique progressive outlook to Indian Islam. Whatever problems exist in Muslim society today are due to radicalization and hatred being imported by dogmatic and selfish leaders from Wahabi mindset of Arab that did not even spare the grave of Prophet from destruction.

They would also refuse to highlight that there was never a Hindu President in Pakistan or Bangladesh. But India proudly had Abdul Kalam as its President. In fact they would refuse to even refer to Muslim heroes like Abdul Kalam, Abdul Hamid, Ashfaqullah Khan because they represented anti-thesis of radical Islam.

They would also not explain why, if Hindus discriminate against Muslims, then why Bollywood had a slew of Muslim superstars since inception of talkies – Dilip Kumar, Shahrukh Khan, Amir Khan, Saif Ali Khan, Salman Khan, Mohd Rafi, Naushad, Rehman etc etc.

They do not explain to them that in reality Muslims are NOT a minority in India. With more than 17% of population (an underestimation), they are actually at par with any majority group and hence cannot blame their plight on Hindus or Christians.

They would not explain that the cause of miseries of Muslims in India are these backward-looking radical Muslims and Mullahs who refuse modern education, instil threat of fatwas, discourage birth-control, issue fatwas insulting Muslim women and restricting their freedom and education, discourage free mixing with Hindus and imbibing the historical culture of the nation.

They just serve their selfish political and dogmatic agenda by poisoning minds of young Muslims and keeping un-poisoned minds under fear of threat. And hence the politics of vote-bank emerges. The reach of the Evil is now far and wide. He has both carrot and stick.

Muslims suffer, Hindus suffer, Hindustan suffers. The aam-aadmi turns a blind eye like in case of Damini dying on street. After all we excel only in writing obituaries, not success stories.

The media finds ways for protecting its commercial and professional interests. The politicians manage a balancing act between carrot of vote-bank and stick of fear. Sentimental orators and writers serving cause of ‘Hindutva’ would write reactionary rhetorics targeting entire communities that no one reads or takes seriously, except the media that would use it as a point to blame “Hindu fundamentalism” again! And some fools would see this writeup of Agniveer and start abusing religions.

One group would consider this writeup as justification for abusing Islam. Others would see it as conspiracy to demean Islam. Both will fight and the Evil will eventually win! The likes of Owaisi would get even more votes. We would nurture yet another monster. And continue our wait for the superhero who never ever came and would never ever come.

No one would step ahead to be the superhero himself. No one would think logically and honestly that hatred has to be destroyed from within and outside to be a superhero. No one would admit their own responsibilities in making things better. In having the grand-heartedness to love all humans as their own family members regardless of religion and birth. In having the courage to stand up against Evil attempting to abuse my mother. In having the vision to work for solutions that bring results and work at roots rather than show frustration which only make things worse.

Sounds depressing! Huh!

Come on friends, if this depression is not to turn true, lets get a bit more sensible. A bit more tolerant of each other and a bit more intolerant of the nonsense around. A bit more brave to fight the haters of motherland and a bit more proactive to cut the poison tree from root. A bit more visionary of the glorious future where all of us live in harmony as one family and a bit more realistic about the solutions we implement to achieve that vision. A bit more forgiving of the defects of others and much more critical of our own deeds.

The way we all united to demand death sentence for the rapists irrespective of whether they were Muhammad Afroz or Pawan Gupta, we must also unite to demand resignation of hate-mongers like Akbaruddin Owaisi. We must unite to have his party derecognized and he be sent to jail for treason and death threats to majority.

Enough of fear and apathy. Enough of seeing such incidents in saffron or green color. Let us realize that such monsters are the cause of whatever ignominy Muslims face and whatever terror attacks rest of the world faces. Let us realize that hate-mongers belong to no religion. And hence we must refuse to link such deeds of hate-mongers with any other event or person. We must also refuse to turn a blind eye to such misdirected chutzpah. Because these hate-driven designs give birth to graver crimes that shock the nation and its conscience. Lets thus destroy the root.

We don’t know how much of what Agniveer says will make sense to aam-aadmi (ordinary citizen) and make him rise to perform his special duties. Given the current spate of affairs, we seriously expect nothing from an impulsive, short-sighted, volatile society that we are becoming. But nonetheless, Agniveer stays unflinching in its path to salvation which passes through service of motherland, commitment to truth and tolerance, and constant visionary responsible result-oriented actions towards destruction of evil and nurture of virtuous.

We promise that till our last breath we shall work towards destroying the very roots of hatred that breed monsters like Zakir and Owaisi. We shall constantly strive to work towards a world where all live like one single family irrespective of region, religion, caste etc. In fact the only religion we believe in is religion of universal humanism.

How much we achieve and how quickly we achieve would depend on many things including how many of you commit to become Agniveer yourself. But nonetheless the mission shall continue till we live. And when we cease to live among you all tomorrow, we hope these words of Agniveer would still live and continue to ignite new Agniveers.

Journey is long, the night is dark.

But I can light a lamp, and I can walk.

Islamic Jihad returns to India

Islamic Jihad returns to India
2012, Sept. 8th.
Source: Hindu voice.

In my last editorial I mentioned, ‘what about Indian Muslims who, at the drop of a hat, come on the streets shouting ‘Islam is in danger’?’.

The editorial also mentioned how genuinely enlightened Muslims from Arab countries such as Bahrain, Iran, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Turkey and United Arab Emirates are travelling to Prasanthi Nilayam in Puttaparthi, Andhra Pradesh, India to sing and worship in an Ashram and to share in the peace, tolerance and happiness in the Samadhi [Ed. “higher consciousness] of Satya Sai Baba [Ed. An Indian guru, spiritual figure, mystic, philanthropist and educator], none of which is available in Islam.

To prove me right, Muslims in Mumbai came on the street (in Azad Maidan) on 11th August 2012 by way of a ‘peaceful rally’ in support of Muslims being allegedly attacked in our own Assam and also in another country, Myanmar.

As provocative speeches were in progress, a section of the crowd became “incited” and rioted.
Rioting Muslims molested lady police staff, snatched away weapons from policemen, burnt many vehicles, attacked and injured 45 policemen and set on fire a police van and a few OB vans.

Many cameras of Press persons were snatched and smashed. Many reporters were thrashed. The mob unsuccessfully tried to throw a senior reporter of a daily into a burning vehicle. Many shops in the sub-way were set on fire.

Even female office workers were not spared molestation.

The rioting mob did not spare even the ‘Amar Jawan’ Stambh [Ed. Memorial to Indian Soldiers fallen in battle] in front of the main office of Mumbai Municipal Corporation. It is a memorial for those who sacrificed their life in the freedom battles. Rioting Muslims completely demolished the memorial.

Can you imagine a ‘peaceful’ rioter vandalising the memorial for our Jawans? [Ed. Lit. “young men”, here referring to (young) soldiers.]

Even if there is an iota of nationalism in him he could not have touched it. Far from revering the memorial for our Jawans, these Muslim rioters had the gall to destroy it.

If they are not Jihadis, what are they?

It is reported that Muslims from Kurla (a suburb of Mumbai) boarded trains for CST armed with lathis, iron rods, swords and petrol. They alighted at CST, a distance of about 18 Kms, and indulged in these heinous acts of violence. Inspite of prior information, the police did not stop them on the way.

Were the police prevented from doing so, by the Congress govt.?

If Hindus or any Hindu organisation had created such a riot (which is unimaginable), the Congress Govt. would have riddled their bodies with bullets.

Leaders of all ‘secular’ parties would have pounced on the organisation demanding its ban.

The Govt. would have shown it as a proof of ‘Saffron Terror’.

Will they term the 11 August riots in Mumbai by Muslims as ‘Green Terror’?

They wouldn’t, because it is against their secular Dharma. And Vote bank dirty Politics.

The Mumbai riots by Muslims was the outcome of the over-appeasement of minorities and also the Congress policy of ‘Muslims should not be hurt’.

The Raza Academy which called for this ‘peaceful’ protest did not utter a single word when nearly four hundred thousand Hindus were driven out of Kashmir by Jihadis.

The persecution of Hindus in Pakistan and Bangladesh does not register with them. Sunni Muslims wantonly killing Shia Muslims in Pakistan and Iraq does not bother them.

They close their eyes when the Taliban behead innocent Muslims in Afghanistan.

Now their hearts bleed for Myanmar Muslims who have been refused asylum even by Bangladesh, a Muslim country.

In the month of August 2012, we saw two agitations – one being held by Baba Ramdev in Delhi, against corruption and black money and the present one under discussion being held by Raza Academy.

In the former, we could see patriotic fervour. Their protest was only against the misrule of the UPA Govt.

Every one was carrying a national flag. The protesters were peaceful and orderly. No public property was damaged.

In the latter, we could see only anti-patriotism. No one carried the national flag. On the contrary, photographs show that there was at least one Pakistani flag.

This demonstration took place in the month of Ramzan, when Muslims were supposed to observe restraint.

But while Ministers and Political Leaders were enjoying “Iftar” parties [Ed. Daily sunset parties at which Muslims celebrate being able to eat again], Muslims assembled at Azad Maidan for a ‘peaceful’ demonstration, started a riot profaning the “sanctity” of the month.

What has happened in Assam is a fight for the survival of the indiginous Hindus.

Muslims in Assam and Bangladeshi infiltrators have joined hands to eliminate local Bodos, who are Hindus.

It is idiocy to describe it as an “ethnic clash” or a “clash between nationalists and anti-nationalists”.

It is Islamic jihad.

Muslims – whether from India, Pakistan or Bangladesh – consider themselves as one Community. Islam does not recognise national boundaries.

It does not believe in nationalism.

Islam wants to establish its rule over the entire world.

Muslims are acting according to this Islamic dictum.

What has happened in Assam was waiting to happen. In fact, this may be repeated in many parts of India as illegal Bangladeshi Muslims have settled all over India, with the help of local Muslim organisations. Otherwise, how do one explain the fact that many families of Rohingya Muslims from Myanmar have reached Delhi, Hyderabad, etc.?

Are they not infiltrators? Illegal Alien?

Who is giving them asylum?

And how are they being sustained?

Compare this with how the Govt. treats Hindus from Pakistan who refuse to go back in fear of their lives.

Looking at what has happened in Assam and the support given by Muslims in Mumbai, Pune, Bangalore, Lucknow, Ranchi, Bareilly, Sirohi, etc. one can certainly be sure that Jihad has arrived in India.

This has been seen in various parts of the world at various times in history.

This is primarily the consequence of a mixture of Islamic theology and its history.
Unless we have genuine and uncompromising political and military will (which the UPA Govt. does not), this Jihad is likely to be replicated in other parts of India too in the near future.

Posted by FFI Editor

How to debate with Muslim or Moslim?

DEBATING ABOUT ISLAM – PART 1
Once you know something about Islam and try to talk to others, you may find yourself in a debate. Here are some of the “standards”.

CAN YOU READ ARABIC?Â
Everyone from Muslims to atheists uses this. The implication is that Arabic is a unique language that can’t be translated and therefore, how could you know what you are talking about? First, the Koran claims to be a universal message for all humanity for all times. If the message is universal, then it must be able to be understood by all. If the message cannot be understood by everybody, then by definition it is not universal. So, which is it?

Another thing to consider is that over half of the Koran is about kafirs and politics. Do you really think that a political message about a kafir cannot be understood by the kafir? If so, what is that message that cannot be understood?

It must be made clear which Arabic is being spoken about. The Arabic of the Koran is classical Arabic which is about as similar to modern Arabic as the English of Chaucer and Beowulf is similar to modern English. Said in another way, not even a modern Arab can read classical Arabic. It is estimated that fewer than a thousand scholars who read classical Arabic can compose a paragraph on a random topic.

And what about the nearly billion Muslims who don’t even understand modern Arabic? If it is necessary to understand classical Arabic to understand what the Koran is about, then how can those billion non-Arabic-speaking Muslims understand the Koran? And if they cannot understand the Koran how can they be Muslims?

Ask the person who presents the argument if they have any opinions about the doctrine of Christianity. Then ask them if they read Hebrew, Aramaic or Biblical Greek? If they do not read those languages how can they form an opinion about something they have to read in translation? Of course they can read it and form an opinion, the same way we can read and understand the Koran.

A secondary question is why would anyone want to believe that the Koran couldn’t be understood? What is the purpose of believing that out of all the books in the world, why would there be one that cannot be translated?

The Koran is only 18% of the total doctrine. Would the questioner believe that the other 82% of the doctrine not be understood as well?

WELL, THE CHRISTIANS DID…Â
This response usually comes after some grim facts are given about Islam. This is probably the most common response from non-Christians. The best response is to ask if they have a reason that they don’t want to talk about Islam, since they want to change the subject. The average person knows next to nothing about Islam and sometimes this gambit is merely a way to steer the conversation into a familiar ground.

They are just trying to prove that Islam is not any worse than Christianity. At this point, welcome the chance to compare the two. Choose the ground of comparison. The best place to start is the founders. Compare Mohammed to Christ. The other good comparison is in ethics. Compare Islam’s dualistic ethics to unitary Golden Rule ethics.

Another version of this is that the person will compare some failed Christian to a “good” Muslim they know at work. It is fairly useless to do personal comparisons. How do you choose which Muslim out of 1.5 billion Muslims and which Christian do you choose out of a couple billion Christians?

A variation on the “Well, the Christians did …” is “What about the Crusades”? This is the time to say you welcome a comparison of the Crusades to jihad. Start with the question of why the Crusades were needed. Islamic jihad caused the invasion of the Middle East. The Crusades were a response to a cry for help by the tortured and oppressed Christians in their native land. Did the Christians do some very wrong things? Yes, but notice that the Crusades have been over nearly a thousand years. Jihad is active today. And while we are at it, why do academic libraries have many books on the Crusades, which lasted only 200 years, and so few on jihad, which has lasted 1400 years? The West has analyzed the Crusades forever and has never analyzed jihad.

I KNOW THIS MUSLIM AND HE SAYS…
Why is the Muslim your friend knows the only Muslim out of 1.5 billion that makes him the expert on Islam? Remember, the average Muslim knows very little about the doctrine of Islam. Why? Because, historically the imams have acted as the high priests of Islam and they have never made the doctrine simple to understand. That is one way they keep their prestige and power.

But once you know something about the doctrine, you can say that you know also know a Muslim, and his name is Mohammed, and what you say comes from the Sunna. In short, your Muslim, Mohammed, can beat your friend’s Muslim on any issue of doctrine. If the Muslim your friend knows says something about Islam that agrees with Mohammed, then it is right. If what he says contradicts Mohammed, then he is wrong. So this Muslim your friend knows is either wrong or redundant, but never more right than Mohammed.

I KNOW THIS MUSLIM AND HE IS A NICE MAN
Probably so. What does that prove about Islam? He may follow the Golden Rule and not Islam. That is, he may be a poor Muslim and a good person.

Now is the time to explain about the Islam of Mecca and the Islam of Medina and which one is the more powerful. It is also time to explain about dualism and how Islam always has two faces.

Stay with doctrine and history of Islam, never get personal and talk about an individual Muslim. Actually, there is one way to talk about any Muslim, show how what they do and say follows the doctrine.

Besides, you know this Muslim and his name is Mohammed. Don’t talk about “Muslims,” talk about Mohammed.

THAT IS NOT THE REAL ISLAM
If you are quoting the Koran or the Sunna, then it is the real Islam, by definition. The Koran and the Sunna are Islam, the real Islam. All other Islam, such as is found in the media, is the false Islam. There is only one real Islam, the doctrine of Islam.

THEY DON’T REALLY BELIEVE THAT.Â
This comes after you have revealed some horrific part of the doctrine. What do Muslims call themselves? The believers. What do they believe? The Koran and the Sunna. They say that is what they believe. Really believe.

I KNOW THIS MUSLIM AND HE IS NOT VIOLENT
This is a restating of, “I know this Muslim and he is good man.” He may be a poor Muslim and a good man who follows the Golden Rule.

But, the statement shows that there is no understanding of the duality of Islam. The Koran has both violence and tolerance against the kafirs. Today in America the power of Islam is just getting started, so Islam is still weak. When Mohammed was weak in Mecca, he did not kill anybody. Islam is still in the first phase of jihad here.

But the Koran says that one Muslim can beat two kafirs. It also says that Islam must be the dominant political system. So when Muslims reach a third of the population (that makes it 2 to 1), they will be in the full stage of Medina and violence becomes a standard operation. But even then, we know from the Sira, that many Muslims just don’t have the stomach for the violence. The Sira shows that Muslims can support jihad many ways, besides personal violence. The “peaceful” Muslim you know is commanded to give money to Islamic charities and the charities give the money to the actual fighters.

WHAT ABOUT THE VIOLENCE IN THE OLD TESTAMENT?
Look at the violence in the Old Testament. It has two qualities—local and temporary. None of the violence is commanded to be global and eternal. In each case the violence is directed in a political struggle and when it was over it was over.

The violence in the Trilogy is for all Muslims, in all places and for all time. Jihad is to stop only when every kafir submits. Look at Mohammed, the perfect example. He was involved with violence until the day he died. And on his deathbed he directed eternal violence against the kafirs when he said in his last breath: “Let there be neither Christian or Jew left in Arabia.”

IF ISLAM IS SO VIOLENT, HOW CAN IT BE SO SUCCESSFUL?
The Sira records that when Islam committed violence, it attracted new followers. As Osama bin Laden says: “People like a winning horse.” After 9/11 in the US, new followers joined Islam. Communism was a political system that preached, promised and delivered violence and it attracted many people. Many people love violence. Have you never paid any attention to Hollywood? Violence is piled upon violence and people line up to see it.

Islam is growing rapidly. but most of the growth can be attributed to high birth rates, not conversion. Islam’s growth in kafir countries is due to immigration, not conversion.

DEBATING ABOUT ISLAM – PART – 2
1. A Federal prosecutor may be in trouble because he’s a smart, successful kafir.

2. Jihad against the Christians at the highest level!  A Common Word is supreme jihad by Islamic scholars and the Muslim Brotherhood, championed by the usual dhimmi suspects at Yale, Harvard and Princeton Divinity Schools. Here’s the brilliant rebuttal by knowledgeable kafirs to this taqiyya-fest titled, “Truth About A Common Word.”

3. The Muslim Brotherhood supreme guide in Egypt on Bin Laden the jihad fighter, Sharia law and various other hot Islamic political topics. From Memri.org.

THERE ARE DIFFERENT KINDS OF ISLAMÂ
The differences in the different kinds of Islam are due to religion, not politics. Take the Sunni/Shia split, the largest division in Islam. Both Sunnis and Shias completely agree on how to treat kafirs and jihad. All Muslim subscribe to one of five schools of the Sharia and the Sharia’s position regarding kafirs and jihad is the nearly the same for all the schools.

The only big difference is whether to use violent jihad or peaceful jihad against the kafirs.

HADITH—SOME OF THOSE AREN’T REAL
If you quote a hadith to a Muslim and they don’t like it, they will say, “Well, some of those hadiths are not acceptable (or true or some other disclaimer).” And that is true. Actually, when a Muslim says that, they are practicing taqiyya, sacred deception and duality. If it is a hadith, then a Muslim cannot be denied the right to follow it. It is Sunna.

The hadiths from Bukhari and Muslim are the creme de la creme of hadiths. When Bukhari made his collection, he threw out 99% of those he found. Those 99% are the unsure ones, the other 1% which are used here are authoritative.

THE MYTH OF THE ARABS, ABRAHAM AND ISHMAEL
The core of the myth is told in the Koran about how Adam built the Kabah at Mecca. It was the first house of worship. Then Abraham brought Ishmael to Mecca, prepared to perform the sacrifice demanded by God. Ishmael was left in Mecca with his mother, Hagar.

We have a very detailed report of Mecca at the time of Mohammed right down to the names of individuals, their children and wives. Arabs were very keen on family relationships. A person’s very name gave you his father’s or son’s name and a chain of relationships. One of the things that infuriated the Meccans about Mohammed was that he said their ancestors were in Hell since they were not Muslims.

Not a single person in Mohammed’s Mecca is named Abraham, Ishmael, or Hagar. Not one. Why? They had no knowledge about any relationship between the Arabs and Abraham. They knew of the Jews and Abraham, but they made no claim of kinship with their names. After Mohammed, these names became common amongst Muslims.

This has another large implication. Islam claims that Muslims, Christians and Jews are members of the Abrahamic faith. Not so. There is no such thing. It was an unsubstantiated claim by Mohammed.

THE ISLAMIC GOLDEN AGE
If you spend any time talking about Islam you will hear: “What about the greatness of the Islamic Golden Age? Why, the West got all of its real learning from the Muslims. They preserved the Greek philosophers, invented algebra, chemistry, the algorithm and laid the basis of our learning.” Or: “The high point of human civilization occurred in Baghdad and Moorish Spain. It was all peace and harmony with Christians, Jews and Muslims living in multi-cultural compatibility.”

“When Europe was mired in the Dark Ages, Islam was a shining light on the hill. “

Hmmm. Let’s go over the data. Notice that the best of Islam is compared with the worst of the West. First, there never was a “Dark Age”. This prejudicial naming came from the time of the Renaissance when they looked back at the dogmatic approach to knowledge in medieval times and wanted to separate themselves from it. It is just like new rich wanting to shed their poor ancestry.

Let’s examine the Middle Ages for a moment and see how they came about. The collapse of Greek and Roman civilization came about from internal problems of too much wealth for too long. The ravages of the bubonic plague wiped out an estimated 30 to 60 percent of the European population, making it vulnerable to invasion. The annihilation of the centers of learning came from the jihad of Islam. So even if you want to use the term Dark Ages, at least recognize the influence of jihad.

And let’s look at how “un-dark” the “Dark Ages” were. Everyone agrees that the Renaissance was one of humanity’s great moments. But how did all of that greatness spring from the “Dark Ages”? You don’t get a champion racehorse from a plug mare. The Middle Ages were a time when the European man was created. The collapse of Roman central government allowed a new culture to emerge that was a fusion of Roman, Greek, Celtic and Germanic culture. Part of this culture was mechanical genius.

Europe was creating a new mind, the mind that would change the world by producing practical machines such as water mills and a thousand small improvements in daily life. The cathedrals were a stunning tribute to humanity and works of great beauty.Â
Without the Middle Ages there could not have been a Europe or a Renaissance.

Now look at the Golden Age of Islam in Baghdad. Where did it come from? Not from Islam. The Koran was the first book written in Arabia. Architecture in Arabia consisted of mud huts. Mohammed’s house was made from mud bricks; a man could touch the ceiling and a curtain served as a door. Arabic culture was barely iron age with its only art being poetry.

So where did the learning come from? Islam crushed the Christian, Zoroastrian, Buddhist and Hindu cultures and brought them all together in one culture. The scholars of these cultures were brought together and created an intellectual surge called the Islamic Golden Age. It was kafirs who created this so-called Golden Age while Islam took the credit. As an example, we call our numbers Arabic numerals. But the Arabs got them from the Hindus and took credit. We should call our numbers Hindu numerals.

It was Christian dhimmis who translated all of the Greek and Roman literature for their masters. Later, when this material was translated back into Greek and Latin, the Muslims got the credit for the work. In short, Islam got its knowledge just like it got its wealth— from theft and violence.

Islam cannot sustain any intellectual effort. Their own scholars cannot do the work due to the limitations of the dogma of Islamic thought.

And what were the Muslims able to do with this knowledge? Not much. What did they do with glass? Make pretty windows for the mosque. Europeans took glass and made microscopes and telescopes as well as stained glass. What did the Muslims do with mathematics? Not much. They combined the mathematics of the Greeks and Hindus and created algebra. And what did they do with algebra? Nothing. When it came back to Europe, the Europeans created calculus and physics.

A list of the great Arabic scholars reveals that many on the list were Christians with Arabic names. And the best of the Muslim scholars turned out not to be very Muslim and their works were later demolished by Muslims who were true to the real knowledge of Islam, the Koran.

Now let’s look at the great Moorish Spain. It was supposed to be a great center of multiculturalism. Of course, there was that day in Cordoba when the Muslims killed 8,000 Jews, but ignore that. What did Islam do as soon as it came to Spain? Shipped a thousand blondes off to be slaves in North Africa. But ignore that. Then there was the day when, after a battle against the Christian knights, they beheaded all the corpses and all the prisoners to build a hill of skulls. A Muslim then mounted the hill of skulls and issued the call to prayer. But ignore that.

How can any culture that makes slaves and dhimmis of all kafirs be called great? Simple. It served the needs of the groups that pushed the idea. It was Voltaire and Jewish scholars who created the idea of the Golden Age in Moorish Spain. Why? As an intellectual counterweight to the hated Catholic church. That propaganda attack survives today. It is the intellectuals who hate Christianity today, who push the same ideas.

If Islamic learning was so great, then where are the great Muslim scholars of today? No Islamic nation has ever had a Nobel prize in science. Not one. There have been eight Muslims who shared Nobel prizes in science, but it occurred in working in kafir nations and with kafir partners.

Bill Warner

Signup for our weekly newletter.

copyright 2008, CBSX, Inc. dba politicalislam.com

Use this as you will, just do not edit and give us credit.

Permalink:Â http://www.politicalislam.com/blog/debating-about-islam-part-2/

http://www.taslimanasrin.com

http://www.taslimanasrin.com

http://www.taslimanasrin.com/fool the poor.htm

TIMES NEWS NETWORK

AUGUST 27, 2002

TASLIMA NASRIN

I heard in the morning that my book, Utal Haowa (Wild Wind), has been banned inBangladesh.

The reason that was put forward by the government was that my book had destroyed the socio-political amity of the country.And that there were anti-Islamic statements in my book. The first part of my autobiography, Amar Meyebela, was also banned inBangladesh. Both these books chronicle my life. I have just one thing to say in this regard. You have no freedom of expression inBangladesh.

I have penned my views on politics, society and religion and they need not necessarily match the views of the government. If there is democracy in a country, a citizen will have the freedom to talk his mind out.

WhatBangladeshoffers in the name of democracy is farce. It is no democracy at all. Elected politicians act like dictators. But this is nothing new forBangladesh. Ever since 1971 whenBangladeshbecame independent, this has been continuing there. Various political parties use religion as a pawn to garner votes. Religion is the best tool with which you can fool the unlettered, the poor.

The government has taken away from me my right to citizenship. No government allows me to go toBangladesh. Whichever party has come to power has tried to throttle my voice. They are trying to show that they are doing all this to protect their religion. I understand, this will help them win votes.

But this is only going to push the country back by a thousand years. The possibility ofBangladeshever becoming a secular state is being destroyed by such acts.

Can you call a country a democracy where freedom of speech is not encouraged? Is it possible to dream of a healthy society in such a country? Never. No wonder political terror is pushing the country to the brink of devastation.

Murders are rampant, women are being raped, they are committing suicide. Ever since religion was made the guiding force of nation-building, torture on humanity has been on the rise. Fundamentalism destroys the amity between people. If this is not criticised, we will not have right-thinking people around. Without this, religious sentiments will keep a nation years behind in everything.

Idiotic Hindu Historians..What a tragedy

SOME TIMES BY ; SANTOSH BHATT

A country that forgets it’s history is destined to repeat the same mistakes of history. Sadly Indian history is being rewritten by the same hindus whose ancestors were raped and looted by the same scum bag moslems and these scum bags are being written in glorifying terms by the idiotic hindu historians.What a tragedy the country has to go through.

 No tragedy is worse than forgetting history and we have not even known the true history of our country.We are being ruled by scum bags and we are slogging it for scum bags and we are writing the Hindus are as a rule spineless. cowardly and miserly people. They have no self respect.

They have no knowledge of their own scriptures. Thousands of years of foreign rule has wiped out all traces of greatness and bravery from these people.

The hindus who are there now have no connection to the hindus of the yore. these are all inferiority quality humanbeings who happen to be in india. The secularism nonsense has emasculated the hindus.

Do I see a hope? Yes provided the idotic hindus read the scriptures of other religions and compare it to their own, to even comprehend what treasure has been left behind.

Read Qrand, bible and Holy Shreemad Bhagavad Geeta and decide,  you would want to follow which book. olden era or scum bag rule. Frustrating to say the least.

I did my schooling in India and I don’t remember any history book highlighting the atrocities of the mughals. Infact, the mughal period is shown as a golden period of art and civilization in India.

Thanks to the internet and the ability of researchers to bring out the facts and reach out to everyone, this knowledge is no longer something that the leftist /Marxists like Romila Thapar can prevent from spreading.

Muslims steadfast deny such atrocities even take place and they never take active measures to oppose these goings on.

Muslims are guilty of nothing when it comes to dealing with non-Muslims under Islam.

Indians and everybody else is going to need to grow a spine and understand that there can be no peace between Muslims who want to bring darkness and ignorance to the world and non-Muslims who are fighting to survive.

India’s first education minister @ the federal level was a Muslim who had Arabic heritage.

India’s first prime minister was brought up on British education and was conditioned to regard Indic history as inferior to the Mughals.

Aligarh Muslim University was very worried that any truth about Muslim invasion and rule would cause a massive anti-muslim backlash.

Leftists always hated religion but they had no balls to pick on Islam. So they picked on Hinduism as they were sure that in the aftermath of Gandhi’s assassination, Hindus would be easy pickings.

These leftists were given prominent roles in Jawaharlal Nehru University (which produces anti-Indians by dozens) and National council for educational research and training (NCERT) which writes text books.

Net Net……Hindus will never come to know about these atrocities and Muslims will always be told that Islamic rule was the most benign on Hindus.

Nadir Shah of Iran invaded India in 1738–39. After committing great massacre and devastation, he captured a large number of slaves and drove them away along with a huge plunder. Ahmad Shah Abdali from Afghanistan invaded India thrice in the mid-eighteenth century. In his victory in the Third Battle of Panipat (1761), some 22,000 women and children of the slain Maratha soldiers were driven away as slaves.

 As already cited, the last independent Muslim ruler, Tipu Sultan, had enslaved some 7,000 people in Travancore. They were driven away and forcibly converted to Islam.

Enslavement of the infidels in India went on as long as Muslims were ruling with authority.

The consolidation of power by the British mercenaries in the nineteenth century eventually ended enslavement in India. Even during the Partition (1947), Muslims kidnapped tens of thousands of Hindu and Sikh women and married them to Muslims: a form of age-old enslavement (discussed already).

 In November 1947, as already noted, Muslim Pathan raiders carried away Hindu and Sikh girls from Kashmir and sold in the markets of Jhelum (in Pakistan).

These are accounts of enslavement by Muslim invaders and rulers mainly in Northern India. Enslavement was going on in earnest in far-off provinces across India, including Gujarat, Malwa, Jaunpur, Khandesh, Bengal, Mewad and the Deccan, which were either under the control of Delhi or were independent Muslim sultanates.

The records of enslavement in those regions were not always recorded systematically.

My blood is boiling

my blood is boiling as i m hearing the blast case in delhi…
 i think our government is blind as well as deaf…. they are just securing terrorists like afjal guru and amir ajmal kasab, while on the other hand they r fail to secure our protection,,,

 i think only the policy of “an eye for an eye” can protect us,,,
just kill the terrorists without any pity….
 just f**k them othewise they’ll F**k us,,,,,
the nerves of our government is full with dirty water instead of blood, so we have to do the job……
 aaj phir lalkara gaya hai apne watan ko,
 apne hindustan, apne gulshan ,apne chaman ko,
 ab dikha do yaaron, garmi unhe apne lahu ki,
 aur badh chalo aaj dushmano k daman ko…..

Image via Wikipedia

Related articles

• Just shoot the bloody terrorists down! (asspeaks.wordpress.com)

MALSI CULT. CAN HUMANITY CO EXIST?

SOME TIMES BY ; SAM HINDU

I don’t know how many of my articles Readers  have read.  If you read enough you’d know that the reason I think Islam must go is because it is a doctrine that does not allow peaceful coexistence.

Let us say there is a religion with the following teachings. Do Moslim  think they  can have any peaceful co-existence with the followers of that religion?

We will cast terror into the hearts of Muslims. Therefore strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them. 8:12
Let not the non-Muslims take for friends or helpers the Muslims. 3:28,
Rouse the non-Muslims to the fight against Muslims. 8:65,
Then fight and slay the Muslims wherever ye find them, 9:5,
Fight the Muslims, and God will punish them by your hands, cover them with shame. 9:14 ,
O ye the non-Muslims take not for protectors your fathers and your brothers if they love Islam.9:23,
O ye the non-Muslims! Truly the Muslims are unclean. 9:28,
O ye non-Muslims! fight the Muslims who gird you about, and let them find firmness in you. 9:123,
Therefore, when ye meet the Muslims, smite at their necks; At length. 47:4,

I hope you agree that such religion has no right to exist, that its followers must be re-educated or if they persist they should be separated from the rest of mankind to maintain peace.

This is the 21st century and these educated Muslims believe the Earth is flat because the Quran says so and the Quran cannot be wrong.

Can you have peaceful co-existence with the Malsians whose sacred book mirrors the Quran and incites hatred against the Muslims?  You did not answer this question? Would you say that Malsi religion is a peaceful religion?  

No! Violence is NOT“shared characteristic” of humankind. People become violent when exposed to violent teachings. Yes, violence does also have psychological components, such as greed, envy, anger, etc. all byproducts of low self-esteem. However, crowds have a psychology of their own and they can become violent through external influences.  We do not expect to see violent behavior among a crowd coming out of a church, a synagogue, a Hindu or a Buddhist temple, or a Zoroastrian or a Baha’i gathering. But if I see a crowd coming out of a mosque towards me, I will run as fast as I can. 

Non violent people can become violent when they believe in violent teachings. If religion had no effect in how we humans behave, then what is the point of having religion at all?

The very purpose of religion is to influence people and make them do things their way.  If their way is peaceful, the believers are likely to behave peacefully and if it is violent, the believers will act violently.

Let us hear now what proof you can present to make us believe that Muhammad was a genuine, .

Related articles

• Autobiography Of Ali Sina. Why I Left Islam.. (samhindu.wordpress.com)
• “Muslims are the vilest of animals…” (samhindu.wordpress.com)
• Why Attack Only Islam? By ; Ali Sina (samhindu.wordpress.com)
• I am a Non-Arab Muslim Scum. (samhindu.wordpress.com)
• Islam Can Not Fool The Public Anymore. (samhindu.wordpress.com)

Related articles

• Islam Can Not Fool The Public Anymore. (samhindu.wordpress.com)
• “Muslims are the vilest of animals…” (samhindu.wordpress.com)
• Autobiography Of Ali Sina. Why I Left Islam.. (samhindu.wordpress.com)
• Why Attack Only Islam? By ; Ali Sina (samhindu.wordpress.com)
• Ali Sina speaks. (samhindu.wordpress.com)
• The Quran Says that People of Other Religions are to be Violently Punished in This World (paulmarcelrene.wordpress.com)
• The Truth About Islam (choiceindying.com)

Muslim Appeaser Politicians Turning India into an Islamic State

6/20/2011

Muslim appeaser politicians turning India into an Islamic State, Part 2

By FFI Contributing Editor Dr Radhasyam Brahmachari

Muslim appeasement by the UPA government:

In the previous article, it has been mentioned how the present United Progressive Alliance (UPA) coalition government in Delhi, under the leadership of Indian National Congress (INC) party is appeasing the Muslims of India with unfair, undemocratic, non-secular and even illegal privileges and concessions to Muslims and thus turning India into a de facto Islamic State. In fact, Muslims in India, despite being the minority, enjoy elevated status and much more privileges, generally offered by a typical Islamic government in a so called Islamic state.

The reader may gauge the extent of Muslim appeasement by the UPA government from the statement of its PM Manmohan Singh. He has said that the Muslims are the first to claim the produce of India. What is the basis of such a stupid comment? Does the Muslim contribute maximum share of India’s GDP? How aggressively the Congress is wooing the Muslim community nationally is evident from the a recent comment by another leader Digvijay Singh, who, while referring to the killing of Osama bin Laden, reverentially said “Osamaji” and bemoaned why the terrorist leader was not given a proper burial.

To please the Muslims further, the said UPA government has drafted a bill called “Prevention of Communal and Targeted Violence (Access to Justice and Reparation) Bill, 2011” and is intending to place the same in the Parliament in the coming Monsoon Session. If the bill gets approval of the Parliament and becomes a law, the Muslims will be supreme lords of the country while majority Hindus will be dragged into slaves of the Muslims.

It is needless to say that the UPA government is going to do this with an eye on vote-bank politics. It has been mentioned in the previous article that the Muslims cast their votes, not according to his/her personal choice but, according to the dictates of their religious and community leaders. Therefore, all Muslim votes go for a single party. When the quantum of Muslim votes becomes significant, or a deciding factor for winning or losing election, political parties start wooing Muslims for their votes by offering them unfair, and even illegal, concessions. The frantic competition that ensues among the political parties to win election and stay in power makes the politicians blind and take any sinister attempt, even at the cost of national interest, to win the Muslim block votes.  The reader may recall that the UPA government came to power for the second time in 2009, with the help of the Muslim votes and the present Communal Violence Bill is reward for their support.

The drafting of the Communal Violence Bill:

The draft of the so called Prevention of Communal and Targeted Violence (Access to Justice and Repatriation) Bill, 2011, has been prepared by the National Advisory Council (NAC), headed by Sonia Gandhi, the president of INC. It has been agreed by the NAC at its meeting on July 14th, 2010, the NAC Working Group on the Communal Violence Bill, has set up an Advisory Group and a Drafting Committee to develop a draft bill on communal and sectarian violence. The  draft a bill should aim to provide effective prevention and control of communal and sectarian violence, and justice and comprehensive reparations to survivors and victims of communal and sectarian violence. This would be ensured on the basis of certain essential elements accepted by people’s groups, civil society groups and the NAC, including the key principle of accountability of public officials. While framing the draft, the relevant provisions, including rules, for relief, compensation, rehabilitation, resettlement, restitution, and reparations, keeping in mind the rights of internally displaced persons.

The following are the members of the Advisory Group Members Communal & Sectarian Violence Bill, 2010 Advisory
Group
 (1) Abusaleh Shariff, (2) Asgar Ali Engineer, (3) Gagan Sethi, (4) H.S Phoolka, (5) John Dayal, (6) Justice Hosbet Suresh, (7) Kamal Faruqui, (8) Manzoor Alam, (9) Maulana Niaz Farooqui, (10) Ram Puniyani, (11) Rooprekha Verma, (12) Samar Singh, (13) Saumya Uma, (14) Shabnam Hashmi, (15) Sister Mary Scaria, (16) Sukhdeo Thorat, (17) Syed Shahabuddin, (18) Uma Chakravarty, (19) Upendra Baxi, (20) Aruna Roy, NAC Working Group Member, (21) Professor Jadhav, NAC Working Group Member and (22) Anu Aga, NAC Working Group Member
 The Joint Conveners of the Advisory Group are (1) Farah Naqvi, Convener, NAC Working Group and (2) Harsh Mander, Member, NAC Working Group

The members of the Drafting Committee are (1) Gopal Subramanium, (2) Maja Daruwala, (3) Najmi Waziri, (4) P.I. Jose, (5) Prasad Sirivella, (6) Teesta Setalvad, (7) Usha Ramanathan (upto 20 Feb 2011) and (8) Vrinda Grover (upto 20 Feb 2011).

The conveners of Drafting Committee are (1) Farah Naqvi, Convener, NAC Working Group and (2) Harsh Mander, Member, NAC Working Group

The key Guiding Principles laid down before the drafting committee are
(1) Broaden title and applicability of the law to include ‘communal & sectarian violence’,
(2) Shift from empowering the State, to seeking action & accountability of State/public officials,
(3) Basic framework of law must not rest on declaration of “disturbed areas”,
(4) Need for an independent National Authority to ensure effective compliance with the law, without disturbing the federal structure,
(5) Ensure accountability & criminal liability of public officials for acts of omission & commission, for preventing or controlling communal & sectarian violence, or extending timely and adequate rescue, relief and rehabilitation,
(6) Incorporate the doctrines of Command & Superior responsibility,
(7) Definition of communal & sectarian violence to cover both isolated incidents as well as mass crimes, against people based on religious, caste, linguistic, regional and other identities,
(8) Need to specifically define and include new crimes/offences including sexual assault, enforced disappearances, torture, long-lasting social & economic boycott, and genocide, among others,
 (9) Need to remove prior sanction requirement for Hate Speech (Sec. 153A & 153B – IPC),
(10) Statutory obligation on government to lay down national standards for the entire spectrum of provisions for victims – including rescue, relief, compensation, rehabilitation, resettlement, restitution, reparation and recognizing the rights of internally displaced persons,
(11) Implementation according to the norms in point 10 to be a statutory obligation under this law,
(12) Compensation amounts to be specified in terms of national norms under the law, and revised every 3 yrs and
 (13) Need for amendments in CrPC and Indian Evidence Act to meet extraordinary circumstance of communal & sectarian violence to protect victims’ rights. In addition to that,
(14) specific provisions for victim-witness rights to be made under this law

The list of people as given above for guiding, monitoring and preparing the draft of the Communal Violence Bill 2011, one finds that all of them are loyal to the Nehru-Gandhi family. Many of them operate several NGOs and it is well known that an NGO is very efficient instrument to siphon public money. In addition to that, these committees were formed without any approval of the Parliament. So, while commenting on the formation of the committee, Sam Rajappa, in his article  Communal Violence Bill  says, “The very fact that Parliament was bypassed and the undemocratic National Advisory Council, acting as a supra Parliament, was entrusted the task of drafting the most sensitive legislation, makes the UPA government a suspect. Harsh Mander and Farah Naqvi, conveners of the advisory group to prepare the draft Bill, are known for bashing Narendra Modi, Chief Minister of Gujarat, and do not enjoy the confidence of the public” (The Statesman, June 4, 2011)..

“The NAC is a conglomeration of NGO members handpicked by Sonia Gandhi for their faith in the Nehru-Gandhi dynasty. Most of these NGOs are foreign-funded and they act according to the wishes of donors.  It is indirect interference in the affairs of the nation by foreign countries. The NAC chairperson has become a supra Prime Minister and an instrument for maladministration”, Rajappa adds.

Salient points of the draft:

The most crucial part of the draft for the Communal Violence Bill 2011 is the definition of the term ‘group’. The basis of such groupings may be religion, mother tongue, ethnicity and caste, e.g. schedule castes and schedule tribes. The next important step is to decide whether a group consists of the people of minority or the majority community. In India as a whole, Hindus are a majority and Muslims and Christian are a minority, on the basis of religion. Based on this criterion, the draft proceeds to designate any group consisting of Hindus as a group of majority, while a group consisting of Muslims and Christians as a group of minority community. But such identification is utterly faulty.
 There are so many states, e.g. Jammu and Kashmir, Punjab, Mizoram, Manipur, Meghalaya and Nagaland, and in the Andaman and Nicobar islands, where Hindus are minorities. So, in those states Hindus are deserved to be considered a religious minority. The most astonishing as well as ridiculous part of the draft Bill is that, communal troubles are created only by members of the majority community or the Hindus. From this basic presumption it comes out that for any incident of communal violence, only Hindus will be held responsible and punished. So, for any incident of communal violence between Hindus and Muslims in Jammu and Kashmir, where Muslims constitute more than 80% of the population, they will be considered a minority group and only Hindus will be held responsible and punished. Or in other words, if the Muslims in Jammu and Kashmir persecute the Hindus and massacre them en masse, even then the Hindus will be considered offenders and punished, while Muslims will not be held responsible.

Similar is the case for the states Mizoram, Manipur, Meghalaya and Nagaland, where Christians are majority and the Hindus are minorities. In the above mentioned states the Christian missionaries are carrying on ceasasionist movements. They have formed militant terrorist gangs and oppressing the Hindus. If the draft becomes a law, only the Hindus would be held guilty of such a violence and let the perpetrators go scot free, as they have labeled as a minority group. So, the draft Bill proceeds on the presumption that communal violence is created only by the majority community (Hindus) and never by members of the minority communities.

But history tells us that, so far violence between the Hindus and the Muslims is concerned, in almost all the cases, the Muslims are the initiators of the violence. The Mopla Riot in Malabar, Kerala, is one of the most famous incident of Hindu Muslim violence, was initiated by the Muslims (called Moplahs) on August 20, 1921. Instead of calling it a Hindu-Muslim riot, it would be proper to designate it as Hindu pogrom by the Moplahs. Another famous incident of communal violence is the “Great Calcutta Killings” that took place in August, 1946. It is also called the “Direct Action Day” by the historians. August 16 was Friday and that too in the month of Ramadan according to the Arabic calendar. It was therefore the holy day of the holiest month for the Muslims. On that holy day, lakhs of Muslims gathered under the Ochterlony Monument (now Shahid Minar) to offer midday holy Jumma prayer. After finishing the prayer, Muslims started to attack Hindus, killing Hindus, looting Hindu shops, setting Hindu shops and Hindu houses on fire. The killing of Hindus went on for several days.

Vultures feed on corpses of Hindu victims in Calcutta, August, 1946

Many hold this misconception that the 2002 Gujarat violence was initiated by the Hindus. But in reality, the violence was initiated by the Muslims by setting the coach S-6 of the Sabarmati Express on fire on February 27 at Godhra and burning 59 Hindu devotees, including women and children, alive. This barbaric incident initiated the communal violence in Gujarat that claimed over 1,200 lives. So, many called this Gujarat Violence as post Godhra Violence.

The coach S-6 of Sabarmati Express burning at Godhra

So, it can be shown that in every incident of Hindu-Muslim violence, Muslims are responsible. It is due to the fact that the Islamic holy book Koran spews hatred against the non-Muslims, including the Hindus and the Islamic doctrine of jihad inspire the Muslims to kill them, set their houses on fire, loot their wealth and riches, rape their women, occupy their tilling land, convert them by force and so on and so forth. But the holy books of the Hindus do not teach such hatred and oppress the non-Hindus. So, the presumption of the Communal Violence Bill 2011 that majority Hindus should be held responsible and punished for any incident Hindu-Muslim communal violence is patently discriminatory, undemocratic and non-secular. Such a view is totally opposed to the secular principle laid down in the Constitution of India that holds ‘an offence is an offence and the offender should be punished, irrespective of to what group he belongs’.
The other devastating provision:
The other devastating provision of the draft is that, if an individual of the minority community brings an allegation of propagation of hate against an individual belonging to the majority, police will have the right to arrest him without any investigation and put him behind the bar. The victim would not even have the right to know from whom the complaint has come. During trial, the complainant would not have any responsibility to establish his allegation, and it would be the sole responsibility of the victim to prove his innocence.

It is needless to say that this provision, if it becomes a law, would equip the UPA government to victimize any of its political rivals, and send him to prison. Suppose a fictitious man brings an allegation of propagating hate speech against Narendra Modi, the chief minister of Gujarat, the police will have the right to arrest him immediately and put him in prison. He will be released if and only if he succeeds to prove himself innocent.  So, Arindam Chaudhuri, an author, has said that the bill is to kill secularism in India (The Pioneer, June 4, 2011). He has also said, “The NAC-drafted Communal Violence Bill is a recipe for unmitigated disaster. In the guise of promoting communal harmony it promotes rank communalism. In the guise of protecting minorities, it attacks Hindu rights. This Bill will strike at the very foundation of liberty and legitimise criminal misdeeds of Muslims. It must not become law.”

Conclusion:

From the discussion presented above, it appears that the draft of the Communal Violence Bill 2011 has been framed with a strong motive of Hindu bashing. The contents of the draft grossly violate the sacrosanct principle of secularism, democracy and equality enshrined in the Constitution of India and if it becomes a law, it would be a disaster for the Hindus. Though it is doubtful whether such a draconian bill could survive even a preliminary scrutiny of the Supreme Court of India, the Hindus should raise their voice across the country so that the bill gets defeated in the Parliament. If this bill is passed by the Parliament and becomes a law, it will undoubtedly push India a step towards Islamization.

Related articles

• Bill to treat Hindus in India as Jews In Nazi Germany – All Under Sonia Gandhi Leadership (hidf1.wordpress.com)
• “Draft Bill on communal violence more draconian than TADA” (hindu.com)
• Why is there violence between Hindus and Muslims (wiki.answers.com)

The Fallen One…. A Poem By Krishna.

The Fallen One

5/20/2011

By Krishna
***** *****
There lived a lecherous man
way back in Arabia.
 Learnt tricks from a older woman,
Tricked the whole world later.
 He was Mad Mad mohammad(chorus 3 times)
*****
Went to a cave for masturbation,
Ended up having hallucination.
Because he had a horny cock,
felt he was the chosen peacock.
 He was Mad Mad mohammad(chorus 3 times).
*****
He set out to ravage the land of arabia
with his sword and  penis.
Sword killed thousands.
Penis ravaged hundreds,oh what a dreadful sight.
Set a gold standard for his followers to follow.
 He was Mad Mad mohammad(chorus 3 times)
*****
Wow he was a beloved prophet.
He loved children so much.
He made love to them.
 with permission from allah,
 to push in his bullah,
kids cried out in pain,
while he Looked on with religious disdain.
 He was Mad Mad Mohammad(chorus 3 times)
*****
He told the pagans and the Jews and the Christians
fall in line or else……
gave a choice.
sword or penis.
He was the kindest of the prophets.
 He was Mad Mad Mohammad(chorus 3 times)
***
He offered the sword to the husbands
penis to the widows…
alas time took its toll,
never could make it full,
 tried with a horsey,
attained ecstasy,
cried “i am in heaven”,
stupid followers shouted  ’encore’.
 He was Mad Mad Mohammad(chorus 3 times)
***
People tried to bump him off,
with knife,with poison.
Cat of nine lives,lived on.
Because he was evil.
Because he was poison.
World will remember him,
POISON OF  HUMANITY.
 He was Mad Mad Mohammad(chorus 3 times)

……

Bullah means large penis in urdu(type of a slang).Also for ur information(this is out of context) there is a language called brahui spoken in pakistan which has dravidan roots.This world has so much surprises,it is amazing.

Hindu are eliminated Pakistan.

Guys,

Interesting, This is the article from Pakistani newspaper. Read it carefully… Now we have only 40 temples across the Pakistan. The media in our country still talks about the 2002 Gujarat Riots. SHAME……
The forgotten prayers of a people

DAWN.COM
January 5, 2011 (4 weeks ago)
Related News

Al-Qaeda under most pressure since 2001: Obama Beautiful from this Angle Three US drone strikes kill 13 in North Waziristan

A Hindu woman arranges earthern lamps near to Hindu Goddesses to celebrate ‘Diwali’ the festival of lights, at her home in Lahore, Pakistan on Saturday, Oct. 17, 2009. Hindus living in Pakistan are celebrating Diwali where people decorate their homes with light. – AP Photo

KARACHI: The legend is almost as old as the Indus River, Lord Shiva and his consort Sati, daughter of King Dakhsha, were vexed by Sati’s father for not inviting them for a ceremony. Sati went to the ceremony uninvited and in return was ignored. She was hurt by the behavior that she sacrificed herself in the fires and was burnt alive. Upon hearing the fate of his love, Lord Shiva went mad and began chaos on earth.
In order to help Lord Shiva deal with his grief, Lord Vishnu cut Sati’s body in 12 pieces and scattered them across the earth where her head fell upon Hingol. Wherever the pieces of Sati’s body fell became Shakti Peethas, holy places of cosmic power, for all gods and worshippers.
Hingol is not a legend – as a matter of fact – today it is known as Hingol National Park and lies almost 170 km outside of Karachi in Balochistan. Sati’s head fell by Hinglaj Matajee Temple located inside a natural cave of a hill which is a holy pilgrimage site for the 2.5 million Hindus in Pakistan, although many feel the numbers have doubled in the last decade, and more than 90 per cent of them live in the Sindh province.
Hindus are the third religious group, after Muslim and Christians, and Hinduism is considered the indigenous religion of the sub-continent by local and international historians, which is not far from the truth.
There are over 40 Hindu temples across Pakistan, and in Sindh alone there are almost 30 temples in Karachi and interior Sindh.
Many Hindu families are indigenous to the land and some claim to have been for centuries. Over the centuries, empire after empire, some families facing persecution converted to Islam but others have remained Hindus.
“The Hindu community is not protected here,” said Dr. Raj Motwani, a general physician who sits as the Vice President for Shree Ratneshwar Mahadev Welfare Shewa Mandly, a committee for the Hindu community in Karachi. “I remember that Lee Market, Bolton Market, Nagam Colony, and Food Street belonged to Hindu families that lived there for decades before Pakistan’s existence.”
“We never left this land – people migrated here,” he said. “We are still here – fighting for what we deserve as humans.”
During the 1947 partition, almost 15 million Hindus, Sikhs, and Muslims left Pakistan for India and vice versa but some families stayed behind because they considered the land in Pakistan their home. More than half a million people died during the migration.
“Everyone knows the truth, but we cannot speak it out loud,” he said. “The minute that we speak up – we are automatically accused of being part of an enemy intelligence agency and we can get questioned without any legal support.”
Most Hindus families come from lower class backgrounds and those that live in rural areas like interior Sindh are forced into bonded labour by influential landlords. In the past few years, kidnappings have increased among the Hindus, for ransom and women, who are kidnapped and then convert to Islam, have been reported but with no real legal repercussions from the local government.
“The Hindu community is not protected here,” repeated Dr. Motwani. “The converting is explainable; once a girl is kidnapped the men have their way with her and she knows that she won’t be accepted back into her community so she converts and becomes a servant- girl for the men or the family that kidnapped her – tragic but the culture in interior Sindh is traditional, especially when it comes to women.”
The constitution clearly states that religious minorities have many rights and freedom however in the political system Hindus, Christians and Sikhs are still treated as second-class citizens.
After General Pervez Musharraf took power, he wanted to remove the separate electorate system put in place by the former dictator General Ziaul-Haq.
The separate electorate system limited non-Muslims to only vote for candidates from their own religion – the government had a reserved number of seats for minorities in the provincial and national assemblies.
General Musharraf and many others felt that it limited Muslim candidates from reaching out to minority groups to solve the major problem in their communities. He was thwarted in his efforts and many minorities felt that the removal of the policy would not have made a difference in their communities.
“I have friends of all faiths in Pakistan – friendships made up of decades,” mentioned Dr. Motwani. “But that is not the problem – the system is the problem; a small example, the Hindu Gymkhana has finally been given back to us after so many years spent in court yet the management is Muslim and we still do not have a safe place to congregate and celebrate our holidays. Who do I go to for help? a MPA or an MNA – not possible.”
Since the recent attack on the Shah Ghazi Shrine, the security at mandirs across Karachi has tightened but it has not stopped Hindu worshippers from making their offerings to their gods and goddesses who wait patiently for their prayers of better days ahead.

Why is Dubai sinking into the sea? Could it be payback from a GOD !

Why is Dubai sinking into the sea? Could it be payback from a higher authority?
The islands, off the coast of Dubai, were intended to be developed with tailor-made hotel complexes and luxury villas, and sold to millionaires. But the World, the ambitiously-constructed archipelago of islands shaped like the countries of the globe, is sinking back into the sea.

UK TELEGRAPH –(H/T Rod) -Â “The islands are gradually falling back into the sea,” Richard Wilmot-Smith QC, for Penguin Marine, said. The evidence showed “erosion and deterioration of The World islands”, he added.

With all but one of the islands still uninhabited – Greenland – and that one a showpiece owned by the ruler of Dubai, most of the development plans have been brought to a crashing halt by the financial crisis.

Nakheel, the developer, was part of Dubai World, the state-owned conglomerate that had to be bailed out of debts put at around $25 billion at the end of 2009. The Dubai World Tribunal was set up to hear cases arising out of the restructuring and separation of the companies involved.

The low-lying islands represent a vague shape out to sea when viewed from Dubai’s beaches, but are visible by satellite or from the top of the city’s Burg Khalifa, the world’s tallest building, which opened to the public last year.

According to the company, 70 per cent of the World’s 300 islands have been sold. Nakheel is also behind Dubai’s famous Palm-shaped offshore developments. Villas in the only one near completion, Palm Jumeirah, were given to or bought by footballers including David Beckham and Michael Owen.

Many investors who did buy the islands proved unwilling or unable to finance further work when Dubai’s property prices halved in the space of a year.

Penguin claim that work on the islands has “effectively stopped”. Mr Wilmot-Smith described the project as “dead”. Graham Lovett, for Nakheel, said the project was not dead but admitted it was “in a coma”.

“This is a ten-year project which has slowed down,” he said. “This is a project which will be completed.” He said Penguin would make money eventually. “That’s the price Penguin makes to stay in the game,” he said. “They have the potential to earn millions.”
Perhaps God is punishing the Dubai Muslim ‘royalty’ for using slaves, Muslim and otherwise, to build these monuments to decadence and opulent self-indulgence?

Dubai miracle based on slave labor

HILLBUZZ – The fact that Muslims have always held and abused slaves, now and throughout history is undisputed. Everything that’s been built in Dubai in its massive construction boom was created on the backs of slaves…men mostly, but including female sex workers as well, who were duped into coming to Dubai from India, Indonesia, Pakistan, and Asian countries with promises of jobs and large financial incentives to leave their homes and lives behind and work in the Dubai construction industry.

When these people arrived in Dubai, their passports were taken from them, they were stuffed into metal cargo crates that sleep 20 men to a container, rationed just enough food and water to keep them alive, and then enslaved as the brute muscle behind the fanciful Muslim building projects.

Everything in Dubai was built with slaves, and everything in Dubai is now falling apart because more likely than not the slaves sabotaged these building projects as they were going up.

Wouldn’t you have done that? Just think about it.

You are forced to sleep in metal shipping crates with dozens of fellow slaves, exposed to the burning heat of
day and the freezing cold of night, never paid any wages for your work, while your Muslim masters hang onto your passport and stand guard outside the barbed wire perimeter keeping you enslaved against your will. Wouldn’t you dream of loosening bolts, mixing bad cement, and doing whatever you could every day, in small ways, to ensure the Muslim building projects collapsed under the weight of Islam’s own hubris?

Islam is not an inventor or perfecter of anything.  It is a corruptor, and a user.  Islam was designed to be a conquest engine that militaristically and savagely sweeps into a territory, exploits its people and resources, and maintains control through the rote memorization and implementation of the Koran…itself a sadistic playbook for the conquest and subjugation of others.

Muslims do not create beautiful, fanciful projects out of thin air that rise high into the sky with longterm stability…instead, they just buy architectural plans for massive, dreamlike fancies and then follow the Koran’s lead in creating the nightmarish working conditions that enslave others to build these Muslim whims.

All of this evil is catching up with Dubai…which is literally falling apart at the seams.

 

Hindu Kush means Hindu Slaughter Place.

Hindu Kush means Hindu Slaughter

Posted by: Ali Sina

All Standard reference books agree that the name ‘Hindu Kush’ of the mountain range in Eastern Afganistan means ‘Hindu Slaughter’ or ‘Hindu Killer’. History also reveals that until 1000 A.D. the area of Hindu Kush was a full part of Hindu cradle. More likely, the mountain range was deliberately named as ‘Hindu Slaughter’ by the Moslem conquerors, as a lesson to the future generations of Indians. However Indians in general, and Hindus in particular are completely oblivious to this tragic genocide. This article also looks into the reasons behind this ignorance.

21 References – (Mainly Encyclopedia Britannica & other reference books, National Geographic Magazines and standard history books).

INTRODUCTION

The Hindu Kush is a mountain system nearly 1000 miles long and 200 miles wide, running northeast to southwest, and dividing the Amu Darya River Valley and Indus River Valley. It stretches from the Pamir Plateau near Gilgit, to Iran. The Hindu Kush ranges mainly run thru Afganistan and Pakistan. It has over two dozen summits of more than 23,000 ft in height. Below the snowy peaks the mountains of Hindu Kush appear bare, stony and poor in vegetation. Historically, the passes across the Hindu Kush have been of great military significance, providing access to the northern plains of India. The Khyber Pass constitutes an important strategic gateway and offers a comparatively easy route to the plains of Punjab. Most foreign invaders, starting from Alexander the Great in 327 BC, to Timur Lane in 1398 AD, and from Mahmud of Ghazni, in 1001 AD, to Nader Shah in 1739 AD attacked Hindustan via the Khyber Pass and other passes in the Hindu Kush (1,2,3). The Greek chroniclers of Alexander the Great called Hindu Kush as Parapamisos or Paropanisos (4). The Hindu name of the Hindu Kush mountains was ‘Paariyaatra Parvat'(5).

EARLY HISTORY OF HINDU KUSH REGION (UP TO 1000 AD)

History of Hindu Kush and Punjab shows that two major kingdoms of Gandhaar & Vaahic Pradesh (Balkh of Bactria) had their borders extending far beyond the Hindu Kush. Legend has it that the kingdom of Gandhaar was established by Taksha, grandson of Bharat of Ayodhya (6). Gandhaar’s borders extended from Takshashila to Tashkent (corruption of ‘Taksha Khand’) in the present day Uzbekistan. In the later period, Mahabharat relates Gaandhaari as a princess of Gandhaar and her brother, Shakuni as a prince and later as Gandhaar’s ruler.

In the well documented history, Emperor Chandragupt Maurya took charge of Vaahic Pradesh around 325 BC and then took over Magadh. Emperor Ashok’s stone tablets with inscriptions in Greek and Aramaic are still found at Qandahar (corruption of Gandhaar?) and Laghman in eastern Afganistan(3). One such stone tablet, is shown in the PBS TV series ‘Legacy with Mark Woods’ in episode 3 titled ‘India: The Spiritual Empire’. After the fall of Mauryan empire, Gandhaar was ruled by Greeks. However some of these Greek rulers had converted to Buddhism, such as Menander, known to Indian historians as Milinda, while some other Greeks became followers of Vishnav sects (Hinduism)(7). Recent excavations in Bactria have revealed a golden hoard which has among other things a figurine of a Greek goddess with a Hindu mark on its forehead (Bindi) showing the confluence of Hindu-Greek art (8). Later Shaka and KushaaN ruled Gandhaar and Vaahic Pradesh. KushaaN emperor Kanishka’s empire stretched from Mathura to the Aral Sea (beyond the present day Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, and Krygzystan)(9).

Kanishaka was a Buddhist and under KushaaN influence Buddhism flourished in Gandhaar. Two giant sandstone Buddhas carved into the cliffs of Bamian (west of Kabul) date from the Kushan period. The larger Buddha (although defaced in later centuries by Moslem invaders) is about 175 ft tall (10,11). The Kushan empire declined by 450 AD. The Chinese traveller Hsuan-Tsang (Xuan-zang) travelled thru the region in 7 th century AD and visited many Buddhist religious centers (3) including Hadda, Ghazni, Qonduz, Bamian (3,10,11), Shotorak and Bagram. From the 5 th thru 9 th cenury AD Persian Sasanians and Hepthalites ruled Gandhaar. During their rule Gandhaar region was again influenced by Hinduism. The Hindu kings (Shahiya) were concentrated in the Kabul and Ghazni areas. The last Hindu Shahiya king of Kabul, Bhimapal was killed in 1026 AD. The heroic efforts of the Hindu Shahiya Kings to defend the northwestern gates of India against the invaders are described by even al-Biruni, the court historian of Mahmud of Ghazni (12). Some excavated sites of the period include a major Hindu Shahiya temple north of Kabul and a chapel that contains both Buddhist and Hindu images, indicating that there was a mingling of two religions (3).

Islamic invasions on Afganistan started in 642 AD, but over the next several centuries their effect was marginal and lasted only a short time after each raid. Cities surrendered only to rise in revolt and the hastily converted returned to their old religion (Hinduism or Buddhism) once the Moslem armies had passed (3).

THUS TILL THE YEAR 1000 AD AFGANISTAN WAS A FULL PART OF HINDU CRADLE.

HINDU KUSH AND THE HINDU GENOCIDE

Now Afganistan is a Moslem country. Logically, this means either one or more of the following must have happened:

a) original residents of Hindu Kush converted to Islam, or
b) they were slaughtered and the conquerors took over, or
c) they were driven out.

Encyclopedia Britannica (3) already informs us above about the resistance to conversion and frequent revolt against to the Moslem conqueror’s rule from 8 th thru 11 th Century AD. The name ‘Hindu Kush’ itself tells us about the fate of the original residents of Gandhaar and Vaahic Pradesh during the later period of Moslem conquests, because HINDU KUSH in Persian MEANS HINDU SLAUGHTER (13) (as per Koenraad Elst in his book ‘Ayodhya and After’). Let us look into what other standard references say about Hindu Kush.

Persian-English dictionary (14) indicates that the word ‘Kush’ is derived from the verb Kushtar – to slaughter or carnage. Kush is probably also related to the verb Koshtan meaning to kill. In Urdu, the word Khud-kushi means act of killing oneself (khud – self, Kushi- act of killing). Encyclopedia Americana comments on the Hindu Kush as follows: The name Hindu Kush means literally ‘Kills the Hindu’, a reminder of the days when (Hindu) SLAVES from Indian subcontinent died in harsh Afgan mountains while being transported to Moslem courts of Central Asia (15). The National Geographic Article ‘West of Khyber Pass’ informs that ‘Generations of raiders brought captive Hindus past these peaks of perpetual snow. Such bitter journeys gave the range its name Hindu Kush – “Killer of Hindus”‘(10). The World Book Encyclopedia informs that the name Kush, .. means Death ..(16). While Encyclopedia Britannica says ‘The name Hindu Kush first appears in 1333 AD in the writings of Ibn Battutah, the medieval Berber traveller, who said the name meant ‘Hindu Killer’, a meaning still given by Afgan mountain dwellers who are traditional enemies of Indian plainsmen (i.e. Hindus)(2). However, later the Encyclopedia Britannica gives a negationist twist by adding that ‘more likely the name is a corruption of Hindu-Koh meaning Hindu mountains’. This is unlikely, since the term Koh is used in its proper, uncorrupted form for the western portion of Hindu Kush, viz. Koh-i-Baba, for the region Swat Kohistan, and in the names of the three peaks of this range, viz. Koh-i-Langer, Koh-i-Bandakor, and Koh-i-Mondi. Thus to say that corruption of term Koh to Kush occurred only in case of Hindu Kush is merely an effort to fit in a deviant observation to a theory already proposed. In science, a theory is rejected if it does not agree with the observations, and not the other way around. Hence the latter negationist statement in the Encyclopedia Britannica must be rejected.

IT IS SIGNIFICANT THAT ONE OF THE FEW PLACE NAMES ON EARTH THAT REMINDS US NOT OF THE VICTORY OF THE WINNERS BUT RATHER THE SLAUGHTER OF THE LOSERS, CONCERNS A GENOCIDE OF HINDUS BY THE MOSLEMS (13).

Unlike the Jewish holocaust, the exact toll of the Hindu genocide suggested by the name Hindu Kush is not available. However the number is easily likely to be in millions. Few known historical figures can be used to justify this estimate. Encyclopedia Britannica informs that in December 1398 AD, Timur Lane ordered the execution of at least 50,000 captives before the battle for Delhi, .. and after the battle those inhabitants (of Delhi) not killed were removed (as slaves) (17), while other reference says that the number of captives butchered by Timur Lane’s army was about 100,000 (18). Later on Encyclopedia Britannica mentions that the (secular?) Mughal emperor Akbar ‘ordered the massacre of about 30,000 (captured) Rajput Hindus on February 24, 1568 AD, after the battle for Chitod’ (19). Another reference indicates that this massacre of 30,000 Hindu peasants at Chitod is recorded by Abul Fazl, Akbar’s court historian himself (20). These two ‘one day’ massacres are sufficient to provide a reference point for estimating the scale of Hindu genocide. The Afgan historian Khondamir records that during one of the many repeated invasions on the city of Herat in western Afganistan, 1,500,000 residents perished (11).

Since some of the Moslem conquerors took Indian plainsmen as slaves, a question comes : whatever happened to this slave population? The startling answer comes from New York Times (May-June 1993 issues). The Gypsies are wandering peoples in Europe. They have been persecuted in almost every country. Nazis killed 300,000 gypsies in the gas chambers. These Gypsies have been wandering around Central Asia and Europe since around the 12 th Century AD. Until now their country of origin could not be identified. Also their Language has had very little in common with the other European languages. Recent studies however show that their language is similar to Punjabi and to a lesser degree to Sanskrit. Thus the Gypsies most likely originated from the greater Punjab. The time frame of Gypsy wanderings also coincides early Islamic conquests hence most likely their ancestors were driven out of their homes in Punjab and taken as slaves over the Hindu Kush.

The theory of Gypsie origins in India was first proposed over two centuries ago. It is only recently theta linguistic and other proofs have been verified. Even the Gypsie leadership now accepts India as the country of their origin.

Thus it is evident that the mountain range was named as Hindu Kush as a reminder to the future Hindu generations of the slaughter and slavery of Hindus during the Moslem conquests.

DELIBERATE IGNORANCE ABOUT HINDU KUSH

If the name Hindu Kush relates such a horrible genocide of Hindus, why are Hindus ignorant about it? and why the Government of India does not teach them about Hindu Kush? The history and geography curriculums in Indian Schools barely even mention Hindu Kush. The horrors of the Jewish holocaust are taught not only in schools in Israel and USA, but also in Germany. Because both Germany and Israel consider the Jewish holocaust a ‘dark chapter’ in the history. The Indian Government instead of giving details of this ‘dark chapter’ in Indian history is busy in whitewash of Moslem atrocities and the Hindu holocaust. In 1982, the National Council of Educational Research and Training issued a directive for the rewriting of school texts. Among other things it stipulated that: ‘Characterization of the medieval period as a time of conflict between Hindus and Moslems is forbidden’. Thus denial of history or Negationism has become India’s official ‘educational’ policy (21).

Often the official governmental historians brush aside questions such as those that Hindu Kush raises. They argue that the British version is the product of their ‘divide and rule’ policy’ hence their version is not necessarily true. However it must be remembered that the earliest reference of the name Hindu Kush and its literal meaning ‘Hindu Killer’ comes from Ibn Battutah in 1333 AD, and at that time British were nowhere on the Indian scene. Secondly, if the name indeed was a misnomer then the Afgans should have protested against such a barbaric name and the last 660 plus years should have been adequate for a change of name to a more ‘civil’ name. There has been no effort for such a change of name by the Afgans. On the contrary, when the Islamic fundamentalist regime of the Mujahadeens came to power in 1992, tens of thousands of Hindus and Sikhs from Kabul, became refugees, and had to pay steep ransom to enter into Pakistan without a visa.

In the last 46 years the Indian Government also has not even once demanded that the Afgan Government change such an insulting and barbaric name. But in July 1993, the Government of India asked the visiting Jerusalem Symphony Orchestra to change its name because the word Jerusalem in its name is offensive to Moslem Fundamentalists.

CONCLUSION

It is evident that Hindus from ancient India’s (Hindustan’s) border states such as Gandhaar and Vaahic Pradesh were massacred or taken as slaves by the Moslem invaders who named the region as Hindu Kush (or Hindu Slaughter,or Hindu Killer) to teach a lesson to the future Hindu generations of India. Unfortunately Hindus are not aware of this tragic history. The Indian government does not want the true history of Hindu Moslem conflicts during the medieval ages to be taught in schools. This policy of negationism is the cause behind the ignorance of Hindus about the Hindu Kush and the Hindu genocide.

REFERENCES
Encyclopedia Britannica, 15 th Ed, Vol.5, p.935, 1987

Encyclopedia Britannica, 15 th Ed, Vol.14, pp.238-240, 1987

Encyclopedia Britannica, 15 th Ed, Vol.13, pp.35-36, 1987

The Invasion of India by Alexander the Great (as described by Arrian, Q.Curtius, Diodoros, Plutarch & Justin), By J.W.McCrindle, Methuen & Co., London, p.38, 1969

Six Glorious Epochs of Indian History, by Veer Savarkar, Savarkar Prakashan, Bombay, 2nd Ed, p.206, 1985

Chanakya – a TV series by Doordarshan, India

Encyclopedia Britannica, 15 th Ed, Vol.21, pp.36-41, 1987

V.Sarianidi, National Geographic Magazine, Vol.177, No.3, p.57, March 1990

Hammond Historical Atlas of the World, pp. H4 & H10, 1993

W.O.Douglas, National Geographic Magazine, vol.114, No.1, pp.13-23, July 1958

T.J.Abercrombie, National Geographic Magazine, Vol.134, No.3, pp.318-325, Sept.1968

An Advanced History of India, by R.C.Majumdar, H.C.Raychaudhuri, K.Datta, 2nd Ed., MacMillan and Co, London, pp.182-83, 1965

Ayodhya and After, By Koenraad Elst, Voice of India Publication, p.278, 1991

A Practical Dictionary of the Persian Language, by J.A.Boyle, Luzac & Co., p.129, 1949

Encyclopedia Americana, Vol.14, p.206, 1993

The World Book Encyclopedia, Vol.19, p.237, 1990

Encyclopedia Britannica, 15 th Ed, Vol.21, pp. 54-55, 1987

An Advanced History of India, by R.C.Majumdar, H.C.Raychaudhuri, K.Datta, 2nd Ed., MacMillan and Co, London, pp.336-37, 1965

Encyclopedia Britannica, 15 th Ed, Vol.21, p.65, 1987

The Cambridge History of India, Vol.IV – The Mughul Period, by W.Haig & R.Burn, S.Chand & Co., New Delhi, pp. 98-99, 1963

Negationism in India, by Koenraad Elst, Voice of India Publ, 2nd Ed, pp.57-58, 1993

People Who Left Islam

Happy Diwali to all Ex muslims who have come back to Sanatan Dharma of their fore fathers.

To all the Muslims from India, Pakistan, Bangladesh and Mid east please read following testimony of Ex Muslims who have  renounced Islam and came back to their ancestors religion Hinduism or became Atheist or Buddhist and I feel  pain of their fore fathers and family in Hands of Islam.

I invite all Muslims to join the fold of Hindu Sanatan Dharma with open hearts and hands.

By reading all the life experience and pain Ex Muslims and Muslims family and fore fathers and Mothers have suffered made me cry and i became numb as if i was there in their suffering.

People Who Left Islam

Please read all the testimony of Ex Muslims and open your eyes since they are insider telling truth.

http://wikiislam.net/wiki/People_Who_Left_Islam

Is Islam a Religion or Terrorist Cult ?

Is Islam a Religion or Terrorist Cult ? BY ; VIJAY KUMAR
A recent article published in The Tennessean mulled about the legitimacy of Islam as a religion in relation to the disputed mosque in Murfreesboro, Tennessee, but never defined either “legitimate” or “religion” so came to fatally flawed conclusions.

The word “legitimate” has several relevant meanings, one of them being “according to law.” Every fundamental of Islam stands diametrically opposed to the supreme law of the land, our Constitution:

Islam opposes separation of church and state; the First Amendment of the Constitution requires it.

Islam seeks to eradicate freedom of religion; the First Amendment defends it.

Islam suppresses freedom of speech; our First Amendment guarantees it.

Islam strips man of the right to trial by jury, due process, and freedom from self-incrimination; our nation’s forefathers bled and died to preserve these precious rights, memorialized in our Fifth, Sixth, and Seventh Amendments.

Islam commands cruel and unusual punishments; our Eighth Amendment forbids them.

Islam proclaims all men slaves to Allah and to Islamic leaders; our supreme law abolished slavery and involuntary servitude with the Fourteenth Amendment.

In short, Islam is the single most authoritarian, oppressive, and consummate enemy to our cherished God-given rights and freedoms, guaranteed by our Constitution, that this nation has ever faced.

That is not a “religion;” that is a political totalitarianism whose ultimate stated goal is to wipe actual religion from the face of the Earth, and make every knee bow to Islamic hegemony and to Islam alone. Islamic imperialism is infinitely more dangerous than Nazism and Communism combined. Nazism was defeated in less than twenty years of its creation, and Communism was in power less than 70 years, but Islamic imperialism and hegemony has been with us 1,400 years and has consumed innumerable nations, cultures, and civilizations.

Islam does not recognize Hinduism, Buddhism, Confucianism, Sikhism, or Taoism to be legitimate religions, and it considers Judaism and Christianity to be failed, imperfect, and corrupt religions—even though they all predate Islam, and themselves defined the very concept of “religion.” Such is the arrogance of Islam’s worldview of its own supremacy.

The word “religion,” according to Cicero, comes from relegare, “go through again, read again,” and “consider carefully,” and it correctly implies strongly a bond to the collected wisdom of man about his relation to a supreme being and the universe, and his responsibility to his fellow man. This tradition of religious wisdom goes back thousands of years in many civilizations worldwide.

Islam contributed no such wisdom to mankind. Its purported religious wisdom was plagiarized from the actual religions it disdains, and was arrogated to the purposes of violent conquest, slavery, looting, and totalitarian authority over others. It isn’t accidental that the very word “Islam” means “submission,” nor that its punishment for renouncing Islam is death.

The fact that the Quran itself is a political document is not open to argument: it is the political constitution of Saudi Arabia, where Islam came into being as a political and military force.

Islam’s trail of violence, terrorism, and conquest throughout its history tells any reasonable person that it has become imperative to study and evaluate Islam and Arab imperialism objectively, empirically, and critically. Such analysis is not bigotry; it is simply empirical deconstruction, using reason, observation, and the scientific method.

The people protesting the building of the mosque in Murfreesboro are protesting because they are the most informed members of the community, who have actually studied the subject and know with unshakable certainty the truth: Islam is not a religion; Islam is totalitarianism masquerading as religion.

Vijay Kumar

http://www.faithfreedom.org/articles/op-ed/is-islam-a-religion/                                        

Related Articles

• Opposing Tennessee mosque could be a crime, Justice Dept. says (seattletimes.nwsource.com)
• -Samir Khan: “I am a traitor to America because my religion requires me to be.” (answersforthefaith.com)
• Geert Wilders and the Rise of Islamic Correctness (americanthinker.com)

Freedom Bulwark is a Evil triumphs when good people do nothing.

SOME TIMES BY ; SAM HINDU

   Jihad is on the march. Their goal is to take away your freedom. If you do nothing today, your children will not have that choice tomorrow. But if we rise up now, we can get rid of Islam is two decades. Are you willing to be a crusader?

Now that the knowledge of Islam has spread, we can tear down this house of cards. We need to get rid of our pusillanimous, politically correct governments and elect men and women of substance. We need politicians who are not afraid to spe…ak the truth, who are willing swim with the people, against the political current.

But, talk is cheap. We have talked enough. It is time to put those talks into action. To do so we need to change our dhimmi governments. Make no mistake; those in the government that defend Islam passionately are not mere useful idiots, they are often paid traitors.

 We must expose them and get rid of them. We need to elect men and women that are patriotic; that will stand up to Islamic infiltration and defend our democracy, our freedom and our laws.

 Freedom Bulwark is for political action. It is for you to find like-minded people in your area; to network with others who share your concern, to start a revolution and to change your government. If we want to get rid of Islam we need to ch…ange these dhimmi clowns a.k.a. politicians.

 We need a new breed of politicians who care, who love their country and who are willing to stand up for it and defend it.

 Use FreedomBulwark to recruit people to your cause, to inspire others and to get inspired, exchange your ideas and share your plans.

 But how? How can we oppose a religion? Isn’t freedom of religion an essential part of democracy guaranteed by the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the First Amendment?

 If we regard Islam as a religion, we tie our hands and will not …be able to oppose it. But as stated above, Islam is more than a religion. It is also a social order and a political doctrine. These two dimensions of Islam are in violation of our laws and we can ban them.

No one can protest if we ban the Sharia law that prescribes stoning, beheading, wife beating and maiming. No one can object if we outlaw the verses of the Quran that call for violence against non-Muslims and incite hate. We can ban Islam by banning its violence.

Since Islam is a trinity and its religious dimension cannot be separated from its socio-political elements, banning the latter two implies banning Islam as a whole. A knife is made of a blade and a handle. If the blade is banned the handle becomes useless.

But, talk is cheap. We have talked enough. It is time to put those talks into action. To do so we need to change our dhimmi governments. Make no mistake; those in the government that defend Islam passionately are not mere useful idiots, they are often paid traitors.

 We must expose them and get rid of them. We need to elect men and women that are patriotic; that will stand up to Islamic infiltration and defend our democracy, our freedom and our laws.

  FreedomBulwar is a Evil triumphs when good people do nothing.

 And I refuse to stand still and be spectator…

Related Articles

• Islam And Democracy: Can A Country Fully Embrace Both? (huffingtonpost.com)

મોગલ શાહોએ હજારો મંદિરો તોડી પાડેલાં BY ; Kanti Bhatt

મોગલ શાહોએ હજારો મંદિરો તોડી પાડેલાં

Source: Aas pass, Kanti Bhatt  

કાશી-બનારસમાં મોગલ શાસન વખતે શહેનશાહ અકબર ઘણો તટસ્થ અને હિન્દુઓનો પ્રેમી હતો છતાં કાશીનાં મંદિરોને તૂટતાં અટકાવી શક્યો નહીં. તેના પછી ઔરંગઝેબ ગાદીએ આવ્યો. તેણે બનારસનું નામ મુહમદાબાદ રાખેલું. એ પછી ઔરંગઝેબના હુકમથી બનારસનાં સેંકડો હિન્દુ મંદિરો તોડી નખાયા અને હજી અડધાં તૂટેલાં મંદિરોની ઇમારત ઉપર તૂટેલા કાટમાળને વાપરીને ઔરંગઝેબે તેની મસ્જિદો બંધાવી હતી. દિલ્હી, આગ્રા અને પટણાનાં નામો મુસ્લિમ બનાવાયાં હતાં. ઢાકા જે બાંગ્લાદેશનું શહેર બન્યું છે ત્યાં ઘણા બંગાળી હિન્દુ રહેતા હતા. તે ઢાકાનું નામ જહાંગીરાબાદ, રામપુરનું નામ મુસ્તફાબાદ, ચિત્તગોંગનું નામ ઇસ્લામાબાદ અને વૃંદાવનનું નામ મુમીનાબાદ રખાયેલું.

૧૧૯૪ની સાલમાં કનૌજના રાજા જયચંદ્રને હરાવીને કનૌજ શહેર શહેનશાહ શાહબુદ્દીને કબજે કર્યું ત્યારે તેણે ૧૦૦૦ હિન્દુ મંદિરો તોડી પાડ્યાં હતાં. બ્રિટિશરોએ તો તેનાં ૨૦૦થી વધુ વર્ષના શાસનમાં આપણા પર ભયંકર અન્યાય કરી ક્રાંતિ કરનારાને જીવતા સળગાવી દીધેલા. જલિયાંવાલા બાગની અંગ્રેજોની ક્રૂરતા અને બીજા કેટલાય અન્યાયોને આપણે ભૂલી ગયા છીએ. આપણે અકબરની ધર્મનિરપેક્ષતાનાં સતત વખાણ કરીએ છીએ પણ તેણે કાશીમાં હિન્દુ મંદિરો તોડાવીને ત્યાં મંદિરો ચણાતા તે પ્રત્યે આંખ મિંચામણાં કરેલાં છે તે વાત અંગ્રેજ લેખક એમ. એ. શેરિંગે તેના પુસ્તક ‘ધ સેકરેડ સિટી ઓફ હિન્દુઝ’માં લખી છે.

જહાંગીરથી માંડી ઔરંગઝેબને જ્યારે પણ નાણાંની જરૂર પડે ત્યારે લગભગ સવા ત્રણ સદી પહેલાં અમદાવાદના શાંતિદાસ શેઠ પાસેથી નાણાં ઉછીના લેવાયા હતા પરંતુ શાંતિદાસ શેઠે જ્યારે ઔરંગઝેબને કહ્યું કે જે જે મંદિરોને મસ્જિદમાં ફેરવી નખાઈ છે તે હિન્દુઓ અને જૈનોને પાછી અપાય અને ત્યાં પાછાં મંદિરો ચણવા દેવાય, પણ તમામ મોગલ બાદશાહો એ બાબતમાં નુગરા હતા. શાંતિદાસની વાત માની નહોતી. દેશી ભાષામાં એ બાદશાહો ‘હરામી’ હતા. આપણા જ પૈસે રાજ્ય વિસ્તારી આપણાં મંદિરો તોડી આપણા જ પૈસાથી મસ્જિદો ચણાવી હતી.

આમ છતાં આપણે મોગલ શહેનશાહોની ક્રૂરતાને ભૂલી ગયા છીએ. મુસ્લિમોને ઇમામો રમજાન વખતે ખાસ ઉપદેશ આપી ‘માફ’ કરવાની શિખામણ આપે છે. તે ઝનૂની ઇસ્લામવાદી મુસ્લિમો માનતા નથી. આપણે તો અકબર, ઔરંગઝેબ, અહમદશાહ અને તે પહેલાં શહેનશાહ બાબરની ક્રૂરતા ભૂલી ગયા છીએ. બાબરે હિન્દુસ્તાન ઉપર ચઢી આવીને દિલ્હી, આગ્રા અને બીજાં શહેરો કબજે કર્યા એટલું જ નહીં આપણા હિન્દુસ્તાની ઈતિહાસકારોએ બાબરે અનેક મંદિરો તોડી પાડી હિન્દુઓની કતલ કરી છતાં તેમના કવિતા પ્રેમની જ પ્રશંસા કરી છે… પણ? મુસ્લિમ બંધુઓ બાબરીને ભૂલ્યા નથી!

મેવાડના રાણા સંગના નેતૃત્વ હેઠળ રજપૂતોના એક શક્તિશાળી અને વિશાળ સૈન્યને બાબરે હરાવ્યું. આ યુદ્ધને બાબરે જ ‘જિહાદ’ નામ આપ્યું તેમ ઈતિહાસકાર જયકુમાર શુક્લ કહે છે. હિન્દુ ઈતિહાસકારોએ તો બાબરે હિન્દુ રાજાને હરાવીને પછી દારૂનો ત્યાગ કર્યો તેની પ્રશંસા કરી છે. બાબરે તેના તમામ વિજય માટે અલ્લાહનો આભાર માન્યાનું સર્ટિફિકેટ લેખકો આપે છે. આ બાબરે ખાનવાના યુદ્ધ પછી તેમાં મરી ગયેલા હિન્દુઓની ખોપરીઓને જ પથ્થર બનાવીને તેનો મિનારો ચણ્યો હતો પણ ઈતિહાસકાર જયકુમાર શુક્લના કહેવા પ્રમાણે બાબરને હિન્દુસ્તાની ઈતિહાસકારોએ લેખક, કવિ અને વિવેચક કહીને બિરદાવ્યો છે. બાબરનો અર્થ ઘણા સંદર્ભગ્રંથકારો સિંહ કે વાઘ કરે છે.

બાબર, સિંહ હશે પણ તે હિન્દુ ધર્મ બાબતમાં વાઘ જેટલો ક્રૂર હતો. તમે અમૃતા પ્રીતમ નામની મશહૂર લેખિકાને જાણો છો? મોટે ભાગે તે મોટી ઉંમર સુધી ઇશ્ક કરતાં રહ્યાં છે. તેમણે મોટે ભાગે મુસ્લિમ શાયરો સાથે જ લગની લગાવી છે. બીજી કેરળની કવિયત્રી કમલાદાસે ૬૭ વર્ષની ઉંમરે હિન્દુ ધર્મ છોડીને ઇસ્લામ અંગીકાર કરેલો. તેનો પુત્ર એમ. ડી. નાલાપત મુંબઈના જુના અંગ્રેજી અખબારમાં સિનિયર પત્રકાર હતો. તેણે આ અખબારના અધિષ્ઠાતાને એક બદનક્ષીના કેસમાંથી બચાવેલા. કમલાદાસ મૂળ કેરળના હતાં. તેનાં કિશોરકાળમાં એક દારૂ પીધેલા મુસ્લિમે તેના ઉપર રેપ (બળાત્કાર) કરેલો. છતાં કોણ જાણે તેને ઇસ્લામ ઉપર પ્રેમ ઉભરાયો અને તેનો ઈન્ટરવ્યૂ લેવા પત્રકારો પડાપડી કરતા હતા.

કમલાદાસથી મુસ્લિમ બનીને સુરૈયા નામ આપનાવનાર આ સ્ત્રીએ ઇસ્લામ અંગીકાર કર્યો પણ તેની આત્મકથા મુજબ તે દારૂની લતમાં પડેલી ને દારૂ પીવાનું ચાલુ રાખેલું. કમલાદાસને ઘરે ઘણા અંગ્રેજી ભાષી સાહિત્યકારો આવતા તે તેના બેડરૂમના સાથીદાર પણ બનતા. તેમ તે પોતે જ કહે છે. તેની આત્મકથાના ૪૨મા પ્રકરણનું મથાળું ‘ધ લાસ્ટ ઓફ માય લવર્સ’ છે. તેમાં મહાન સાહિત્યકાર નિશીમ એઝેકલની દોસ્તીની-પ્રેમની વાત છે. દિલ્હીના બે પ્રતિષ્ઠિત કટાર લેખકો જેના લેખો જગતભરનાં અંગ્રેજી અખબારો છાપે છે તે ખુશવંત સિંહજી તેમ જ માનનીય કુલદીપ નાયરજી તેમ જ આપણા મહેશ ભટ્ટ અને ત્રણેય પાકિસ્તાનના સાહિત્યકારો, પત્રકારો અને અમુક રાજકારણી સાથે દોસ્તી રાખે છે.

એ બધાની લાંબી વાત જવાદો પણ બાબરી મસ્જિદ અંગે હવે પાછી નવી ગરમી શરૂ થઈ છે ત્યારે આપણે કુલદીપ નાયરે બાબરી મસ્જિદ અંગે શું કહ્યું છે તે તેના જ શબ્દોમાં જોઈએ. તે વાંચીને લાગશે કે કુલદીપ નાયર બાબરી મસ્જિદ બારામાં તેમનો તટસ્થ અભિપ્રાય લખ્યો છે પણ મુસ્લિમ મિત્રોને પ્રિય લાગે તેવો છે. વળી અયોધ્યામાં રામ મંદિરની વાત છે. તો અયોધ્યામાં કોઈ પણ વિશાળ જગ્યામાં રામ મંદિર બાંધી શકાય છે. મુંબઈના ઘરે ઘરે ગણેશચતુર્થીના ગણેશ મંદિરો બંધાય જ છે. મુસ્લિમ બંધુઓને નાહકના નારાજ ન કરવા.

‘ધ ડેઈલી સ્ટાર’ નામના અખબારમાં કુલદીપજીનો જુનો લેખ શબ્દશ:‘બાબરી મસ્જિદ પડી ત્યાર પછી હું બીજે દિવસે અટલ બિહારી વાજપેયી વડા પ્રધાન હતા ત્યારે તેમને મળ્યો. તેમણે બાબરી મસ્જિદ અંગે જે અભિપ્રાય આપ્યો તેનાથી હું દંગ થઈ ગયો. હું તો વાજપેયીજીને ભાજપના એક ઉદારમતવાદી રાજકારણી ગણતો હતો. વાજપેયીજીએ કહ્યું કે ‘મસ્જિદ તૂટી છે ત્યાં ભલે રામ મંદિર બંધાય!’ વાજપેયીના જ શબ્દોમાં ‘લેટ ધ ટેમ્પલ કમ અપ’ પરંતુ તેમની આ ટિપ્પણીને હું બહુ મહત્વ આપતો નથી, કારણ કે જસ્ટિસ મનમોહન સિંઘ લબિરહાનની સમિતિએ બાબરી મસ્જિદને પાડવાના કાવતરામાં વાજપેયીને પણ સામેલ વ્યક્તિ તરીકે વર્ણવ્યા છે.

લિબરહાન કમિશને વાજપેયી અને અડવાણી સહિત ૬૮ જણને ભારતમાં કોમ્યુનલ શાંતિને ખલેલ પહોંચાડનારા ગુનેગાર ગણ્યા છે.’ ઉપરની વાત લખીને કહેવા માંગુ છું કે કુલદીપ નાયર અને બીજા ભારતીયો મુસ્લિમો પ્રત્યે ઉદાર છે તેટલી ઉદારતા મુસ્લિમોએ બાબરી મસ્જિદના પ્રકરણે દાખવવી જોઈએ કે નહીં? સાઉદી અરેબિયાએ બિન વહાબીઓની સેંકડો મસ્જિદો પાંચ વર્ષમાં તોડી પાડી છે તેની તમને જાણ છે? હવે નવા ચુકાદાથી રૂઝાયેલા ઘા તાજા કરવાના ધંધા શરૂ થશે.

Incredible Story of Shibani Acharya

 

Incredible Story of Shibani Acharya

By: Tapan Ghosh**
Translated From Bengali into English by Dr. Radhasyam Brahmachari

The Orissa is a state on the eastern coast of India and Bolangir is the district town of the district Bolangir of the state. The affluent and educated Harishchandra Acharya is a resident of said town of Orissa. He is Brahmin by caste. Harishchandra is serving the Government of Orissa as a Revenue Officer and his wife also is a Lecturer in a local college at Bolangir. The couple has a son and a daughter and the Daughter Shibani is elder to the son. She is 19-year-old and doing B. Sc. in a local college and she is a second-year student in the college. Apart from that, she is doing a computer course B.C.A. in a local computer training centre. The son is younger to Shibani by one year and he is doing an engineering course in an engineering college in Bhubaneshwar, the capital of the state. So, it is a happy and well off family.

But trouble appeared from a quite unexpected quarters. Harishchandra had undertaken a repairing work of his house and engaged some Muslim masons for the job. It should be mentioned here that there is a dearth of masons in Orissa and the people of the state generally hire Muslim artisans from the adjacent state of West Bengal, particularly from the district of Mueshidabad, to get their job done.

In this context, it should also be mentioned that Orissa is the land of Lord Jagannath and the people of the state, though poor, are very pious and deeply devoted to Lord Jagannath. There are two states in India, namely Orissa and Assam, where the Muslims, during the Muslim rule, could not penetrate much due to patriotism and bravery of the people of these two states. So, when the other parts of India were bleeding due to Muslim onslaught, these two states could have been able defeat the Muslim invaders and protect their freedom and culture. So, conversion was also much less and, as a result, percentage of Muslim population in Orissa is much less than the other parts of today’s India.

Presently, Orissa is one of the poorest states of India and many believe that it is due to laziness and lack of initiative of the people of the state. There is a good demand of masons in the state. But the people of Orissa are reluctant to learn the trade to earn their bread. Many also believe that, it is their extraordinary religious and spiritual pursuit that has come in the way of their enthusiasm and perseverance. On the other hand, this lack of initiative and enthusiasm is the wide open gate of misfortune through which distress and misery enter the state. It is, perhaps, impossible even for Lord Jagannath to protect them from that misfortune.

The Muslim masons, Harishchandra had hired, Naimur Shaikh (35) was one of them. One fine morning, Harishchandra and his family could detect that, Shibani had eloped with Naimur. The incident took place at the end of April this year (2010 AD). Everybody was perplexed as well as distressed at this totally unexpected development. Searching immediately started but in vain. At last, Harishchandra could obtain the address of Naimur from other Muslim masons working in the locality. That too could have been possible as the population and influence of the Muslims are marginal in Bolangir. In fact, Muslims contribute only 0.5 per cent of population of the district of Bolangir.

It has been mentioned above that Shibani’s father was an officer under the Government of Orissa and had much influence over the law enforcing authority of the state. So, without much difficulty, he lodged a complaint with the local police station and received quite good response from the police. The reader should understand that, this was not the only incident in the country and hundreds of thousands of such events are taking place in India and in many cases it was found that help from the police is not enough. Hence advice from the peoples, who previously handled such cases, is also important.

In this context, I like to mention one incident, in which Baruipur police station sent a police officer and 6 constables to Pune to rescue a Bengali girl, who had been seduced and kidnapped to Pune and ultimately sold to a brothel. But the police failed to bring her back. On the contrary, the police officer was aware that our organization succeeded to rescue another girl who was similarly kidnapped from Canning and sold to a brothel in Pune, without any police help. So, Shibani’s father, apart from seeking police help, informed the Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP) and other Hindu organization. The All India Assistant Organising Secretary of VHP, Hemantabhai, was from the state Orissa. Harishchandra contacted him and briefed him about the incident and asked for his help. He promised him that his organization would do its best. He also promise that he would also accompany him to Murshidabad in search of her daughter. But they had much confusion over, how far they would be able to do, as the Suti Block in the district of Murshidabad, where Naimur Shaikh lived, is a Muslim dominated (65%) place.

However, on May 3, Harishchandra, with two police officers, one constable and two activists of VHP came to Kolkata from Bolangir. One of the police officers was very efficient and experienced. He was specially selected and deputed by the SP of Bolangir, to rescue Shibani by any means. Meanwhile, we could have been able to engage a person of Fatepur, the village where Naimur lived, to keep watch on Naimur. Luckily, we came to know that the Bharat Sevashram Sangha runs a big Ashram, including a boy’ residential boarding, in a nearby village. We started to maintain regular contact with them. They told me that, Naimur is said to have brought a new girl, who does not understand Bengali and she is not eating anything for last three days. They also informed me that, Naimur already has a wife, a mother of five kids.

On the day before the arrival of the team from Bolangir to Kolkata, I had an occasion to meet Swami Pradiptananda, the brave and spirited monk of the Bharat Sevashram Sangha (and the only shelter for the Hindus of the Muslim dominated district of Murshidabad), at the Sree Nath auditorium hall at Ballygunge and briefed him about the development. It should be mentioned that Swami Pradiptananda is in charge of the Ashram of the Bharat Sevashram Sangha at Beldanga, in the district of Murshidabad. Swamiji contacted the higher police authorities of Bahrampur, the district town of Murshidabad and briefed the incidence to them.
The team from Bolangir came to Kolkata in the next morning. We hired a car for them and they set out for Bahrampur at about 11 AM.

The team arrived Bahrampur in the afternoon and met the Additional SP, and according to his instruction went to the Suti police station at about 9 PM. To keep their operation secret, they preferred to go to Suti police Station in the darkness of night. The Officer-in-charge of the Suti police station fully cooperated with the team. We have previous experience that, in such cases a Muslim staff of the police, who are regularly paid by the miscreants, informs the culprit so that they could hide the kidnapped girl.

A team of police personnel from the Suti police station and the team from Bolangir, accompanied by Harishchandra and two members of the Vishwa Hindu Parishad, raided the house of Naimur nearly at 12 in the midnight. It was a thatched cottage. Naimur was alarmed by seeing the headlight of the police convoy and escaped. After knocking the door, Shivani came out. She was sleeping with Naimur in that room and his other wife was sleeping in the adjacent room with her five children.

Harishchandra became extremely emotional after seeing his daughter. He clasped her hands and broke into tears and said, “Please return to your home. Your mother is very sick of your absence. She is not eating anything for last a few days. She will die if you do not return with me.” The manner and tone, in which Shibani replied her father was extremely harsh and totally unexpected. Everyone was dumbfounded by her behavior. In extremely rude, rough and shrill voice, she said, “None has kidnapped me and I have come here out of my own will. I am having nice days here and I won’t return.” To the police team from Orissa, She said (in Oria), “Naimur was not ready to bring me here, I came here with the unwilling Naimur.” She also said, “I am an adult woman and hence I have the right to do what I want.”

A police officer from Orissa asked her, “Who is that man who has just fled?” Shibani boldly replied, “He is my husband.” The officer asked, “Who is that man to you.” With similar boldness, she replied, “Being a officer, you do not know what is the relation between a husband and a wife.”

The police team from Orissa were surprised and taken aback by the rude and harsh behavior of Shibani. In general, the noble and educated families in Orissa, the children never talk in this manner with their parents. Even Shibani never behaved in this manner with her father. Her attitude toward her father was unthinkable. Sri Hemantabhai, the Leader of VHP, who accompanied the team, later told me that even the main gate of the house of Harishchandra is costlier than the entire house of Naimur. And more than that, he is already a father five children. Add to that, the difference in their food habits. When I was listening to the narration from Hamantabhai, it appeared to me that those were not Shibani’s words, but someone was inside Shibani was telling those words on her behalf.

Shibani then went inside and brought all the documents to prove her age and showed those documents to the police officers. The police team from the Suti police station then told the team from Orissa that, in such a situation they have nothing to do. “We cannot take an adult woman to the police station by force”, they said. Father Harishchandra could understand that, any request and advice to his daughter would be futile. The case of Rijwanur Rahman and Prianka Todi was still haunting the West Bengal Police. So, the entire team returned bowing down their heads with shame.

The tale of Shibani Acharya has been told above. But my intention is not only to tell the story. The long story, that has been told above, is for my inability to make others understand that why Hindu girls behave so erroneously. I have encountered so many similar cases. While I am writing this article, a 16-year-old uneducated village girl is staying in the other room of my house. She fell victim of an attempt of rape and somehow she could escape and come to me. Tomorrow, she will be sent, accompanied by a few members of Hindu Samhati, to the Mandirbazar police station to lodge an FIR. Many similar cases I have heard, heard very attentively. I have heard such stories even from victim girls.

By observing such cases, I have been convinced – though many would not be ready to believe – that the Muslims have acquires some type of black magic or some other form of occult science, or sorcery to charm or hypnotize the Hindu girls. Or they take the help of some herbs to charm them for a certain period of time, a few days or a few months, and to force them to obey their whims. If not occult science and drugs, they must apply some psychological process to hypnotize them.

I am fully convinced that they apply either of the two methods mentioned, otherwise how these Hindu girls, coming from well off educated families can accept such unequal marriages with uneducated Muslim men, most of whom are daily labourers having a wife and children at home and how these Hindu girls continue to live with their poverty-stricken families. I am also convinced that the trend is being diluted by calling it a love-jihad. By studying many such cases, I have been fully convinced that, there is not a trace of love in such cases, but there are tricks, or effect of some herbal medicine, or some psychological or hypnotic process which we do not know. So we are failing to prescribe an effective antidote for that. This ignorance, inability and helplessness is tormenting day and night. I am unable to rid myself of this agony even for a moment.

I therefore request each and every reader of this write-up to give a deep thought over the matter and find out an effective means so that we may be able to stop thousands of Hindu girls from going with Muslims. In that case, we would request him to let us know the trick so that we may put that in practice in a bigger way. We shall then be able to save thousands of our Hindu sisters from disaster and we shall be able to save them from getting lost under the black burqa.

*************************

**The author Tapan Ghosh is the founder and president of the organization HINDU SAMHATI, that is striving to save the Hindus of India from the barbaric Muslim onslaught.

Islamization of America One Step At a Time.

SOME TIMES BY ; SANTOSH BHATT

These mosques are being infused with an activist strain of Islam, Wahhabism.  If you have to ask where the Saudi’s are getting their money, you are not paying attention…it’s coming from you.

 Not to mention, the current U.S. administration in its continuous war against the American people, is doing everything it can to accommodate the “Cordoba Initiative”  project at taxpayers’ expense “that is spearheading plans to build a $100 million Islamic center at Ground Zero, the site where nearly 3,000 Americans were killed by jihadists on 9/11.”  The recent CNN Poll shows 68% of American voters oppose the Ground Zero Mosque.

HE BOW OBAMA IS SUPPORTING ZAKAT ,HE IS SUPPORTING MOSQUE AND ISLAMIC CENTER NEAR GROUND ZERO  IS HE A RESIDENT OF UNITED  STATES OF AMERICA  OR A PRESIDENT OF MUSLIM WORLD ?

Those useful idiot non-Muslims who support the building of the mosque near the 9/11 site or anywhere else by invoking the ideal of religious freedom, are empowering a creed that is devoted to stamping out freedom of religion or any other form of freedom.

In this relentless campaign, the Islamists have a vast cadre of “experts,” “talking heads,” and for-purchase politicians who keep endlessly broadcasting the false mantra that Islam is a religion of peace. This latter bunch is criminally complicit in making the populace complacent and furthering the work of the Islamists.

Obama backs Mosque near ground zero , Wake Up America. BowObama Showing True Colors. (via Santosh Bhatt’s Blog)

When mosques are built, imams, mullahs or mosque elders tend to be sent to the U.S. with one clear mission:  Make Islamic religion, laws, and life supreme within the Unite States or any other host country, using any and all tactics necessary. 

 Next, from within the safety of their local mosques, they begin to use their revolting practices and wild sermonizing to force the genteel Americans to relocate to safer, less threatening neighborhoods and cities as is the case in England and other European countries.

They will elect Muslims to all positions of local influence, who will create and enforce policy according to the Sharia law.  Once they have control over a town, they will begin to establish informal Sharia, and there’s nothing the government can (or will want to) do about it.

Obama backs Mosque near ground zero , Wake Up America. BowObama Showing True Colors.

Sharia is the brutal means by which Islam controls its populations by force, intimidation, and punishments for offenses to Allah.  Already in many European countries, national governments have, out of fear, given Islamic fascists the right to establish their own shadow governments within the borders of countries like Sweden and England, where they can control their own populations without accountability.  Proposals for Sharia are being taken seriously by many western countries.

Mohammad (founder of Islam) The Pedophile] understand Mohammad and his cult and you will understand mind set.

Mohammad A. Khan   wrote    in     www.faithfreedom.org

Here are the best examples-
Although I do not believe there are any versions of Islam, but for colloquial purposes-
Osama is the face of extremist Islam
Obama is the face of moderate Islam
The intentions, however of both are the same!
…One is direct and the other is indirect!

Muhammad: A Cult Leader or Muslims are struck in a cult. (via Santosh Bhatt’s Blog)

Muslims are stuck in a cult….. Muslims are afraid to speak out against jihad terrorism because… Muslims are struck in a cult. Muslims that speak out against Islamic terrorism risk being killed by fellow Muslims because… Muslims are stuck in a cult. Muslims can never be honest with themselves and admit that they have serious problems with what Allah has done and hold much hatred in their hearts.

If you are a Muslim woman or plan to be a Muslim woman for sake of someone’s love, think twice before you jump into Hell or continue to live in Hell. (via Santosh Bhatt’s Blog) (via Santosh Bhatt’s Blog)

Question for Muslim, Can any one answer me ?

 This is HOw Muslims Think.. Wake up America.

Wake up America and just say NO to Islam..Enough is enogh.. just say no..

I recommended a Mosque be allowed to be built at ground zero, that is what the Mayor Blumberg of NY  and our Muslim Presidentwants , but I learned that before the Muzzies wanted to build a Mosque, a Greek Orthodox group wanted to build a church there and was denied permission.

We can not have a dual standard in …the US that allows one religion preference over another.

If the decision was previously made for no religious houses there, then fine leave it at that. But if the Muzzies get their Mosque, let the Greeks also get their church!

• •